Cargando…

肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-MC) is a symptom specific questionnaire designed to assess the impact of cough severity, a major symptom of postoperative patients undergoing lung resection is cough. The aim of this study is to validate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5973360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641696
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.06.04
_version_ 1783326608897081344
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-MC) is a symptom specific questionnaire designed to assess the impact of cough severity, a major symptom of postoperative patients undergoing lung resection is cough. The aim of this study is to validate the LCQ-MC in patients with lung operation. METHODS: Totally 121 patients undergone the lung operation of single medical team, from September 2015 to April 2016 in the Thoracic Surgery Department of West China hospital Sichuan University, were investigated by LCQ-MC before and after operation. We analyzed and calculated the preoperative and postoperative scores of LCQ-MC and Cronbach α. RESULTS: ① The mean LCQ-MC score in preoperative (19.57±1.73) was significant higher than postoperative (17.71±2.72) (P=0.041). ②The Cronbach α in preoperative (0.87) and postoperative (0.89) was significant higher than 0.7. ③The preoperative scores of LCQ-MC (19.31±1.84) was significantly lower in postoperative cough group than in without postoperative cough group (19.97±1.46) (P=0.038). The postoperative scores of LCQ-MC (16.67±2.91) was significantly lower in postoperative cough group than in without postoperative cough group (19.30±1.32) (P=0.001). ④There was no statistical difference (P=0.936) between postoperative LCQ-MC score (17.75±2.51) in lobectomy group and non-lobectomy group (17.79±3.04). CONCLUSION: The LCQ-MC can assess the condition of cough after thoracoscopic surgery in patients with pulmonary disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5973360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59733602018-07-06 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-MC) is a symptom specific questionnaire designed to assess the impact of cough severity, a major symptom of postoperative patients undergoing lung resection is cough. The aim of this study is to validate the LCQ-MC in patients with lung operation. METHODS: Totally 121 patients undergone the lung operation of single medical team, from September 2015 to April 2016 in the Thoracic Surgery Department of West China hospital Sichuan University, were investigated by LCQ-MC before and after operation. We analyzed and calculated the preoperative and postoperative scores of LCQ-MC and Cronbach α. RESULTS: ① The mean LCQ-MC score in preoperative (19.57±1.73) was significant higher than postoperative (17.71±2.72) (P=0.041). ②The Cronbach α in preoperative (0.87) and postoperative (0.89) was significant higher than 0.7. ③The preoperative scores of LCQ-MC (19.31±1.84) was significantly lower in postoperative cough group than in without postoperative cough group (19.97±1.46) (P=0.038). The postoperative scores of LCQ-MC (16.67±2.91) was significantly lower in postoperative cough group than in without postoperative cough group (19.30±1.32) (P=0.001). ④There was no statistical difference (P=0.936) between postoperative LCQ-MC score (17.75±2.51) in lobectomy group and non-lobectomy group (17.79±3.04). CONCLUSION: The LCQ-MC can assess the condition of cough after thoracoscopic surgery in patients with pulmonary disease. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5973360/ /pubmed/28641696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.06.04 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
title 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
title_full 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
title_fullStr 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
title_full_unstemmed 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
title_short 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
title_sort 肺术后咳嗽评估—中文版莱斯特咳嗽量表的应用价值
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5973360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641696
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.06.04
work_keys_str_mv AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí
AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí
AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí
AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí
AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí
AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí
AT fèishùhòuhāisòupínggūzhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuliàngbiǎodeyīngyòngjiàzhí