Cargando…
Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study
BACKGROUND: Internet interventions have been proposed to improve the accessibility and use of evidence-based psychological treatments. However, little is known about attitudes toward such treatments, which can be an important barrier to their use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) determine attitud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764797 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10735 |
_version_ | 1783326819848552448 |
---|---|
author | Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer Harrer, Mathias Kählke, Fanny Fritsche, Lara Salewski, Christel Ebert, David Daniel |
author_facet | Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer Harrer, Mathias Kählke, Fanny Fritsche, Lara Salewski, Christel Ebert, David Daniel |
author_sort | Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Internet interventions have been proposed to improve the accessibility and use of evidence-based psychological treatments. However, little is known about attitudes toward such treatments, which can be an important barrier to their use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) determine attitudes toward guided internet interventions, (2) assess its acceptability compared with other internet-based formats, and (3) explore predictors of acceptance. METHODS: A convenience-sample Web-based survey (N=646) assessed attitudes toward guided internet therapies (ie, perceived usefulness and helpfulness, and advantage relative to face-to-face therapy), preferences for delivery modes (ie, e-preference: guided internet interventions, unguided internet interventions, or videoconferencing psychotherapy), and potential predictors of attitudes and preferences: sociodemographics, help-seeking–related variables, attachment style, and perceived stress. RESULTS: Although most participants perceived internet interventions as useful or helpful (426/646, 65.9%), a few indicated their advantage relative to face-to-face therapy (56/646, 8.7%). Most participants preferred guided internet interventions (252/646, 39.0%) over videoconferencing psychotherapy (147/646, 22.8%), unguided internet interventions (124/646, 19.2%), and not using internet interventions (121/646, 18.8%; missing data: 1/646, 0.2%). Attachment avoidance and stress were related to e-preference (all P<.05). Moreover, preference for therapist-guided internet interventions was higher for individuals who were aware of internet-based treatment (χ(2)(6)=12.8; P=.046). CONCLUSIONS: Participants assessed therapist-guided internet interventions as helpful, but not equivalent to face-to-face therapies. The vast majority (523/646, 81.0%) of the participants were potentially willing to use internet-based approaches. In lieu of providing patients with only one specific low-intensity treatment, implementation concepts should offer several options, including guided internet interventions, but not limited to them. Conversely, our results also indicate that efforts should focus on increasing public knowledge about internet interventions, including information about their effectiveness, to promote acceptance and uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5974457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59744572018-06-01 Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer Harrer, Mathias Kählke, Fanny Fritsche, Lara Salewski, Christel Ebert, David Daniel JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Internet interventions have been proposed to improve the accessibility and use of evidence-based psychological treatments. However, little is known about attitudes toward such treatments, which can be an important barrier to their use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) determine attitudes toward guided internet interventions, (2) assess its acceptability compared with other internet-based formats, and (3) explore predictors of acceptance. METHODS: A convenience-sample Web-based survey (N=646) assessed attitudes toward guided internet therapies (ie, perceived usefulness and helpfulness, and advantage relative to face-to-face therapy), preferences for delivery modes (ie, e-preference: guided internet interventions, unguided internet interventions, or videoconferencing psychotherapy), and potential predictors of attitudes and preferences: sociodemographics, help-seeking–related variables, attachment style, and perceived stress. RESULTS: Although most participants perceived internet interventions as useful or helpful (426/646, 65.9%), a few indicated their advantage relative to face-to-face therapy (56/646, 8.7%). Most participants preferred guided internet interventions (252/646, 39.0%) over videoconferencing psychotherapy (147/646, 22.8%), unguided internet interventions (124/646, 19.2%), and not using internet interventions (121/646, 18.8%; missing data: 1/646, 0.2%). Attachment avoidance and stress were related to e-preference (all P<.05). Moreover, preference for therapist-guided internet interventions was higher for individuals who were aware of internet-based treatment (χ(2)(6)=12.8; P=.046). CONCLUSIONS: Participants assessed therapist-guided internet interventions as helpful, but not equivalent to face-to-face therapies. The vast majority (523/646, 81.0%) of the participants were potentially willing to use internet-based approaches. In lieu of providing patients with only one specific low-intensity treatment, implementation concepts should offer several options, including guided internet interventions, but not limited to them. Conversely, our results also indicate that efforts should focus on increasing public knowledge about internet interventions, including information about their effectiveness, to promote acceptance and uptake. JMIR Publications 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5974457/ /pubmed/29764797 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10735 Text en ©Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen, Mathias Harrer, Fanny Kählke, Lara Fritsche, Christel Salewski, David Daniel Ebert. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 15.05.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer Harrer, Mathias Kählke, Fanny Fritsche, Lara Salewski, Christel Ebert, David Daniel Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study |
title | Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study |
title_full | Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study |
title_fullStr | Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study |
title_short | Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study |
title_sort | public attitudes toward guided internet-based therapies: web-based survey study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764797 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT apolinariohagenjennifer publicattitudestowardguidedinternetbasedtherapieswebbasedsurveystudy AT harrermathias publicattitudestowardguidedinternetbasedtherapieswebbasedsurveystudy AT kahlkefanny publicattitudestowardguidedinternetbasedtherapieswebbasedsurveystudy AT fritschelara publicattitudestowardguidedinternetbasedtherapieswebbasedsurveystudy AT salewskichristel publicattitudestowardguidedinternetbasedtherapieswebbasedsurveystudy AT ebertdaviddaniel publicattitudestowardguidedinternetbasedtherapieswebbasedsurveystudy |