Cargando…

Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals

Tactile speech aids, though extensively studied in the 1980’s and 1990’s, never became a commercial success. A hypothesis to explain this failure might be that it is difficult to obtain true perceptual integration of a tactile signal with information from auditory speech: exploitation of tactile cue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizza, Aurora, Terekhov, Alexander V., Montone, Guglielmo, Olivetti-Belardinelli, Marta, O’Regan, J. Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00767
_version_ 1783326836412907520
author Rizza, Aurora
Terekhov, Alexander V.
Montone, Guglielmo
Olivetti-Belardinelli, Marta
O’Regan, J. Kevin
author_facet Rizza, Aurora
Terekhov, Alexander V.
Montone, Guglielmo
Olivetti-Belardinelli, Marta
O’Regan, J. Kevin
author_sort Rizza, Aurora
collection PubMed
description Tactile speech aids, though extensively studied in the 1980’s and 1990’s, never became a commercial success. A hypothesis to explain this failure might be that it is difficult to obtain true perceptual integration of a tactile signal with information from auditory speech: exploitation of tactile cues from a tactile aid might require cognitive effort and so prevent speech understanding at the high rates typical of everyday speech. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to create true perceptual integration of tactile with auditory information in what might be considered the simplest situation encountered by a hearing-impaired listener. We created an auditory continuum between the syllables /BA/ and /VA/, and trained participants to associate /BA/ to one tactile stimulus and /VA/ to another tactile stimulus. After training, we tested if auditory discrimination along the continuum between the two syllables could be biased by incongruent tactile stimulation. We found that such a bias occurred only when the tactile stimulus was above, but not when it was below its previously measured tactile discrimination threshold. Such a pattern is compatible with the idea that the effect is due to a cognitive or decisional strategy, rather than to truly perceptual integration. We therefore ran a further study (Experiment 2), where we created a tactile version of the McGurk effect. We extensively trained two Subjects over 6 days to associate four recorded auditory syllables with four corresponding apparent motion tactile patterns. In a subsequent test, we presented stimulation that was either congruent or incongruent with the learnt association, and asked Subjects to report the syllable they perceived. We found no analog to the McGurk effect, suggesting that the tactile stimulation was not being perceptually integrated with the auditory syllable. These findings strengthen our hypothesis according to which tactile aids failed because integration of tactile cues with auditory speech occurred at a cognitive or decisional level, rather than truly at a perceptual level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59745582018-06-06 Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals Rizza, Aurora Terekhov, Alexander V. Montone, Guglielmo Olivetti-Belardinelli, Marta O’Regan, J. Kevin Front Psychol Psychology Tactile speech aids, though extensively studied in the 1980’s and 1990’s, never became a commercial success. A hypothesis to explain this failure might be that it is difficult to obtain true perceptual integration of a tactile signal with information from auditory speech: exploitation of tactile cues from a tactile aid might require cognitive effort and so prevent speech understanding at the high rates typical of everyday speech. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to create true perceptual integration of tactile with auditory information in what might be considered the simplest situation encountered by a hearing-impaired listener. We created an auditory continuum between the syllables /BA/ and /VA/, and trained participants to associate /BA/ to one tactile stimulus and /VA/ to another tactile stimulus. After training, we tested if auditory discrimination along the continuum between the two syllables could be biased by incongruent tactile stimulation. We found that such a bias occurred only when the tactile stimulus was above, but not when it was below its previously measured tactile discrimination threshold. Such a pattern is compatible with the idea that the effect is due to a cognitive or decisional strategy, rather than to truly perceptual integration. We therefore ran a further study (Experiment 2), where we created a tactile version of the McGurk effect. We extensively trained two Subjects over 6 days to associate four recorded auditory syllables with four corresponding apparent motion tactile patterns. In a subsequent test, we presented stimulation that was either congruent or incongruent with the learnt association, and asked Subjects to report the syllable they perceived. We found no analog to the McGurk effect, suggesting that the tactile stimulation was not being perceptually integrated with the auditory syllable. These findings strengthen our hypothesis according to which tactile aids failed because integration of tactile cues with auditory speech occurred at a cognitive or decisional level, rather than truly at a perceptual level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5974558/ /pubmed/29875719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00767 Text en Copyright © 2018 Rizza, Terekhov, Montone, Olivetti-Belardinelli and O’Regan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Rizza, Aurora
Terekhov, Alexander V.
Montone, Guglielmo
Olivetti-Belardinelli, Marta
O’Regan, J. Kevin
Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals
title Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals
title_full Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals
title_fullStr Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals
title_full_unstemmed Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals
title_short Why Early Tactile Speech Aids May Have Failed: No Perceptual Integration of Tactile and Auditory Signals
title_sort why early tactile speech aids may have failed: no perceptual integration of tactile and auditory signals
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00767
work_keys_str_mv AT rizzaaurora whyearlytactilespeechaidsmayhavefailednoperceptualintegrationoftactileandauditorysignals
AT terekhovalexanderv whyearlytactilespeechaidsmayhavefailednoperceptualintegrationoftactileandauditorysignals
AT montoneguglielmo whyearlytactilespeechaidsmayhavefailednoperceptualintegrationoftactileandauditorysignals
AT olivettibelardinellimarta whyearlytactilespeechaidsmayhavefailednoperceptualintegrationoftactileandauditorysignals
AT oreganjkevin whyearlytactilespeechaidsmayhavefailednoperceptualintegrationoftactileandauditorysignals