Cargando…

Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-to-recipient gender mismatch as a risk factor for post-transplant graft loss. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library database and EMBASE. The primary outcome was graft loss after liver transp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Quirino, Giovanardi, Francesco, Melandro, Fabio, Larghi Laureiro, Zoe, Merli, Manuela, Lattanzi, Barbara, Hassan, Redan, Rossi, Massimo, Mennini, Gianluca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29853738
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i20.2203
_version_ 1783326841969311744
author Lai, Quirino
Giovanardi, Francesco
Melandro, Fabio
Larghi Laureiro, Zoe
Merli, Manuela
Lattanzi, Barbara
Hassan, Redan
Rossi, Massimo
Mennini, Gianluca
author_facet Lai, Quirino
Giovanardi, Francesco
Melandro, Fabio
Larghi Laureiro, Zoe
Merli, Manuela
Lattanzi, Barbara
Hassan, Redan
Rossi, Massimo
Mennini, Gianluca
author_sort Lai, Quirino
collection PubMed
description AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-to-recipient gender mismatch as a risk factor for post-transplant graft loss. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library database and EMBASE. The primary outcome was graft loss after liver transplantation. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the pooled data between groups with different donor-to-recipient gender matches. Three analyses were done considering (1) gender mismatches (F-M and M-F) vs matches (M-M and F-F); (2) Female-to-Male mismatch vs other matches; and (3) Male-to-Female mismatch vs other matches. RESULTS: A total of 7 articles were analysed. Gender mismatch (M-F and F-M) was associated with a significant increase of graft loss respect to match (M-M and F-F) (OR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.13-1.50; P < 0.001). When F-M mismatch was specifically investigated, it confirmed its detrimental role in terms of graft survival (OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.20-2.80; P = 0.005). M-F mismatch failed to present a significant role (OR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.73-1.62; P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Gender mismatch is a risk factor for poor graft survival after liver transplantation. Female-to-male mismatch represents the worst combination. More studies are needed with the intent to better clarify the reasons for these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59745822018-05-31 Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lai, Quirino Giovanardi, Francesco Melandro, Fabio Larghi Laureiro, Zoe Merli, Manuela Lattanzi, Barbara Hassan, Redan Rossi, Massimo Mennini, Gianluca World J Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-to-recipient gender mismatch as a risk factor for post-transplant graft loss. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library database and EMBASE. The primary outcome was graft loss after liver transplantation. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the pooled data between groups with different donor-to-recipient gender matches. Three analyses were done considering (1) gender mismatches (F-M and M-F) vs matches (M-M and F-F); (2) Female-to-Male mismatch vs other matches; and (3) Male-to-Female mismatch vs other matches. RESULTS: A total of 7 articles were analysed. Gender mismatch (M-F and F-M) was associated with a significant increase of graft loss respect to match (M-M and F-F) (OR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.13-1.50; P < 0.001). When F-M mismatch was specifically investigated, it confirmed its detrimental role in terms of graft survival (OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.20-2.80; P = 0.005). M-F mismatch failed to present a significant role (OR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.73-1.62; P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Gender mismatch is a risk factor for poor graft survival after liver transplantation. Female-to-male mismatch represents the worst combination. More studies are needed with the intent to better clarify the reasons for these results. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-05-28 2018-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5974582/ /pubmed/29853738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i20.2203 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Lai, Quirino
Giovanardi, Francesco
Melandro, Fabio
Larghi Laureiro, Zoe
Merli, Manuela
Lattanzi, Barbara
Hassan, Redan
Rossi, Massimo
Mennini, Gianluca
Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29853738
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i20.2203
work_keys_str_mv AT laiquirino donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT giovanardifrancesco donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT melandrofabio donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT larghilaureirozoe donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT merlimanuela donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lattanzibarbara donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hassanredan donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rossimassimo donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT menninigianluca donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis