Cargando…
Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-to-recipient gender mismatch as a risk factor for post-transplant graft loss. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library database and EMBASE. The primary outcome was graft loss after liver transp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29853738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i20.2203 |
_version_ | 1783326841969311744 |
---|---|
author | Lai, Quirino Giovanardi, Francesco Melandro, Fabio Larghi Laureiro, Zoe Merli, Manuela Lattanzi, Barbara Hassan, Redan Rossi, Massimo Mennini, Gianluca |
author_facet | Lai, Quirino Giovanardi, Francesco Melandro, Fabio Larghi Laureiro, Zoe Merli, Manuela Lattanzi, Barbara Hassan, Redan Rossi, Massimo Mennini, Gianluca |
author_sort | Lai, Quirino |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-to-recipient gender mismatch as a risk factor for post-transplant graft loss. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library database and EMBASE. The primary outcome was graft loss after liver transplantation. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the pooled data between groups with different donor-to-recipient gender matches. Three analyses were done considering (1) gender mismatches (F-M and M-F) vs matches (M-M and F-F); (2) Female-to-Male mismatch vs other matches; and (3) Male-to-Female mismatch vs other matches. RESULTS: A total of 7 articles were analysed. Gender mismatch (M-F and F-M) was associated with a significant increase of graft loss respect to match (M-M and F-F) (OR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.13-1.50; P < 0.001). When F-M mismatch was specifically investigated, it confirmed its detrimental role in terms of graft survival (OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.20-2.80; P = 0.005). M-F mismatch failed to present a significant role (OR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.73-1.62; P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Gender mismatch is a risk factor for poor graft survival after liver transplantation. Female-to-male mismatch represents the worst combination. More studies are needed with the intent to better clarify the reasons for these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5974582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59745822018-05-31 Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lai, Quirino Giovanardi, Francesco Melandro, Fabio Larghi Laureiro, Zoe Merli, Manuela Lattanzi, Barbara Hassan, Redan Rossi, Massimo Mennini, Gianluca World J Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on donor-to-recipient gender mismatch as a risk factor for post-transplant graft loss. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library database and EMBASE. The primary outcome was graft loss after liver transplantation. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the pooled data between groups with different donor-to-recipient gender matches. Three analyses were done considering (1) gender mismatches (F-M and M-F) vs matches (M-M and F-F); (2) Female-to-Male mismatch vs other matches; and (3) Male-to-Female mismatch vs other matches. RESULTS: A total of 7 articles were analysed. Gender mismatch (M-F and F-M) was associated with a significant increase of graft loss respect to match (M-M and F-F) (OR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.13-1.50; P < 0.001). When F-M mismatch was specifically investigated, it confirmed its detrimental role in terms of graft survival (OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.20-2.80; P = 0.005). M-F mismatch failed to present a significant role (OR: 1.09; 95%CI: 0.73-1.62; P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Gender mismatch is a risk factor for poor graft survival after liver transplantation. Female-to-male mismatch represents the worst combination. More studies are needed with the intent to better clarify the reasons for these results. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-05-28 2018-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5974582/ /pubmed/29853738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i20.2203 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Lai, Quirino Giovanardi, Francesco Melandro, Fabio Larghi Laureiro, Zoe Merli, Manuela Lattanzi, Barbara Hassan, Redan Rossi, Massimo Mennini, Gianluca Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | donor-to-recipient gender match in liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29853738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i20.2203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laiquirino donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT giovanardifrancesco donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT melandrofabio donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT larghilaureirozoe donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT merlimanuela donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lattanzibarbara donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hassanredan donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rossimassimo donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT menninigianluca donortorecipientgendermatchinlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |