Cargando…
Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen XL (TPXL), and a noncontact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients and normal controls. METHODOLOGY: In the current study, two groups of individuals we...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899644 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16 |
_version_ | 1783326893960855552 |
---|---|
author | Osman, Essam A. Gikandi, Priscilla W. Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A. Alotaibi, Majeedah Mousa, Ahmed |
author_facet | Osman, Essam A. Gikandi, Priscilla W. Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A. Alotaibi, Majeedah Mousa, Ahmed |
author_sort | Osman, Essam A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen XL (TPXL), and a noncontact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients and normal controls. METHODOLOGY: In the current study, two groups of individuals were recruited; the first group included glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) while the second one was a glaucoma-free group. The IOP was measured through GAT, NCT, and TPXL for the same participants by three different physicians in both groups. Measurements through the three devices were compared statistically. Correlations between different methods of assessment were also assessed. RESULTS: In the glaucoma group, the mean IOP measured was 16.0 ± 5.5 mmHg (range, 6–40 mmHg) with GAT 20.5 ± 6.9 mmHg (range, 10–52 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 20.2 ± 6.5 mmHg (range, 8–50 mmHg) with the NCT. In the control group, the mean IOP was 14.0 ± 2.7 mmHg (range, 9–19 mmHg) with GAT, 17.3 ± 3.8 mmHg (range 6–30 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 17.9 ± 3.9 mHg (range 10–27 mmHg) with the NCT. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements were approved among the three devices with relatively higher readings using both NTC and TPXL. All three methods are required to address different situations that present in the daily clinical and surgical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5974822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59748222018-06-13 Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Osman, Essam A. Gikandi, Priscilla W. Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A. Alotaibi, Majeedah Mousa, Ahmed Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen XL (TPXL), and a noncontact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients and normal controls. METHODOLOGY: In the current study, two groups of individuals were recruited; the first group included glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) while the second one was a glaucoma-free group. The IOP was measured through GAT, NCT, and TPXL for the same participants by three different physicians in both groups. Measurements through the three devices were compared statistically. Correlations between different methods of assessment were also assessed. RESULTS: In the glaucoma group, the mean IOP measured was 16.0 ± 5.5 mmHg (range, 6–40 mmHg) with GAT 20.5 ± 6.9 mmHg (range, 10–52 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 20.2 ± 6.5 mmHg (range, 8–50 mmHg) with the NCT. In the control group, the mean IOP was 14.0 ± 2.7 mmHg (range, 9–19 mmHg) with GAT, 17.3 ± 3.8 mmHg (range 6–30 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 17.9 ± 3.9 mHg (range 10–27 mmHg) with the NCT. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements were approved among the three devices with relatively higher readings using both NTC and TPXL. All three methods are required to address different situations that present in the daily clinical and surgical practice. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5974822/ /pubmed/29899644 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Osman, Essam A. Gikandi, Priscilla W. Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A. Alotaibi, Majeedah Mousa, Ahmed Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
title | Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
title_full | Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
title_short | Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia |
title_sort | comparison of goldmann applanation, noncontact air puff, and tono-pen xl tonometry in normal controls versus glaucoma patients at a university hospital in riyadh, saudi arabia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899644 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osmanessama comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia AT gikandipriscillaw comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia AT aljasserabdulrahmana comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia AT alotaibimajeedah comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia AT mousaahmed comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia |