Cargando…

Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen XL (TPXL), and a noncontact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients and normal controls. METHODOLOGY: In the current study, two groups of individuals we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osman, Essam A., Gikandi, Priscilla W., Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A., Alotaibi, Majeedah, Mousa, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899644
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16
_version_ 1783326893960855552
author Osman, Essam A.
Gikandi, Priscilla W.
Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A.
Alotaibi, Majeedah
Mousa, Ahmed
author_facet Osman, Essam A.
Gikandi, Priscilla W.
Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A.
Alotaibi, Majeedah
Mousa, Ahmed
author_sort Osman, Essam A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen XL (TPXL), and a noncontact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients and normal controls. METHODOLOGY: In the current study, two groups of individuals were recruited; the first group included glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) while the second one was a glaucoma-free group. The IOP was measured through GAT, NCT, and TPXL for the same participants by three different physicians in both groups. Measurements through the three devices were compared statistically. Correlations between different methods of assessment were also assessed. RESULTS: In the glaucoma group, the mean IOP measured was 16.0 ± 5.5 mmHg (range, 6–40 mmHg) with GAT 20.5 ± 6.9 mmHg (range, 10–52 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 20.2 ± 6.5 mmHg (range, 8–50 mmHg) with the NCT. In the control group, the mean IOP was 14.0 ± 2.7 mmHg (range, 9–19 mmHg) with GAT, 17.3 ± 3.8 mmHg (range 6–30 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 17.9 ± 3.9 mHg (range 10–27 mmHg) with the NCT. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements were approved among the three devices with relatively higher readings using both NTC and TPXL. All three methods are required to address different situations that present in the daily clinical and surgical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59748222018-06-13 Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Osman, Essam A. Gikandi, Priscilla W. Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A. Alotaibi, Majeedah Mousa, Ahmed Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen XL (TPXL), and a noncontact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients and normal controls. METHODOLOGY: In the current study, two groups of individuals were recruited; the first group included glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) while the second one was a glaucoma-free group. The IOP was measured through GAT, NCT, and TPXL for the same participants by three different physicians in both groups. Measurements through the three devices were compared statistically. Correlations between different methods of assessment were also assessed. RESULTS: In the glaucoma group, the mean IOP measured was 16.0 ± 5.5 mmHg (range, 6–40 mmHg) with GAT 20.5 ± 6.9 mmHg (range, 10–52 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 20.2 ± 6.5 mmHg (range, 8–50 mmHg) with the NCT. In the control group, the mean IOP was 14.0 ± 2.7 mmHg (range, 9–19 mmHg) with GAT, 17.3 ± 3.8 mmHg (range 6–30 mmHg) with the TPXL, and 17.9 ± 3.9 mHg (range 10–27 mmHg) with the NCT. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements were approved among the three devices with relatively higher readings using both NTC and TPXL. All three methods are required to address different situations that present in the daily clinical and surgical practice. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5974822/ /pubmed/29899644 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Osman, Essam A.
Gikandi, Priscilla W.
Al-Jasser, Abdul-Rahman A.
Alotaibi, Majeedah
Mousa, Ahmed
Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_full Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_short Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_sort comparison of goldmann applanation, noncontact air puff, and tono-pen xl tonometry in normal controls versus glaucoma patients at a university hospital in riyadh, saudi arabia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29899644
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanessama comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia
AT gikandipriscillaw comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia
AT aljasserabdulrahmana comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia
AT alotaibimajeedah comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia
AT mousaahmed comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactairpuffandtonopenxltonometryinnormalcontrolsversusglaucomapatientsatauniversityhospitalinriyadhsaudiarabia