Cargando…

Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science

We believe it should be possible to make operational the philosophical ideas of the good life in order to make it the object of scientific research. The Quality of Life Research Center in Copenhagen, Denmark has therefore spent the last several years with these questions and tried to find practical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ventegodt, Soren, Merrick, Joav, Andersen, Niels Jorgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14570987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.76
_version_ 1783326899293913088
author Ventegodt, Soren
Merrick, Joav
Andersen, Niels Jorgen
author_facet Ventegodt, Soren
Merrick, Joav
Andersen, Niels Jorgen
author_sort Ventegodt, Soren
collection PubMed
description We believe it should be possible to make operational the philosophical ideas of the good life in order to make it the object of scientific research. The Quality of Life Research Center in Copenhagen, Denmark has therefore spent the last several years with these questions and tried to find practical and evidence-based scientific solutions.This paper describes the theoretical road taken in moving from the abstract philosophy of life to the actual questionnaire. It presents an important aspect of our work with the quality-of-life (QOL) concept though the last decade. We have developed the quality-of-life philosophy; the SEQOL, QOL5, and QOL1 questionnaires; the quality-of-life theory; and the quality-of-life research methodology. We carried out quality-of-life population surveys and developed techniques for improving quality of life with the chronically sick patient. This paper presents the struggle to create a rating scale for the generic measurement of the global quality of life, based on quality-of-life theory, derived from quality-of-life philosophy. The developed rating scale is a ratio scale combining a Likert scale, a visual analogue scale, and a numerical scale, to a reduced combination scale. This allows for the extraction of as much information from the respondents as possible without exhausting them unduly or demanding more than can be reasonably expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59748452018-06-10 Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science Ventegodt, Soren Merrick, Joav Andersen, Niels Jorgen ScientificWorldJournal Research Article We believe it should be possible to make operational the philosophical ideas of the good life in order to make it the object of scientific research. The Quality of Life Research Center in Copenhagen, Denmark has therefore spent the last several years with these questions and tried to find practical and evidence-based scientific solutions.This paper describes the theoretical road taken in moving from the abstract philosophy of life to the actual questionnaire. It presents an important aspect of our work with the quality-of-life (QOL) concept though the last decade. We have developed the quality-of-life philosophy; the SEQOL, QOL5, and QOL1 questionnaires; the quality-of-life theory; and the quality-of-life research methodology. We carried out quality-of-life population surveys and developed techniques for improving quality of life with the chronically sick patient. This paper presents the struggle to create a rating scale for the generic measurement of the global quality of life, based on quality-of-life theory, derived from quality-of-life philosophy. The developed rating scale is a ratio scale combining a Likert scale, a visual analogue scale, and a numerical scale, to a reduced combination scale. This allows for the extraction of as much information from the respondents as possible without exhausting them unduly or demanding more than can be reasonably expected. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2003-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5974845/ /pubmed/14570987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.76 Text en Copyright © 2003 Soren Ventegodt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ventegodt, Soren
Merrick, Joav
Andersen, Niels Jorgen
Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science
title Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science
title_full Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science
title_fullStr Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science
title_short Measurement of Quality of Life II. From the Philosophy of Life to Science
title_sort measurement of quality of life ii. from the philosophy of life to science
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14570987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.76
work_keys_str_mv AT ventegodtsoren measurementofqualityoflifeiifromthephilosophyoflifetoscience
AT merrickjoav measurementofqualityoflifeiifromthephilosophyoflifetoscience
AT andersennielsjorgen measurementofqualityoflifeiifromthephilosophyoflifetoscience