Cargando…

Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley

Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO(2)), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO(2). Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ching-Hsun, Kronrad, Gary D., Cheng, Shiaolin D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12941973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.61
_version_ 1783326903227121664
author Huang, Ching-Hsun
Kronrad, Gary D.
Cheng, Shiaolin D.
author_facet Huang, Ching-Hsun
Kronrad, Gary D.
Cheng, Shiaolin D.
author_sort Huang, Ching-Hsun
collection PubMed
description Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO(2)), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO(2). Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching to alternative energy sources, increasing efficiency, or offsetting carbon emissions. This study determined the cost and profitability of sequestering carbon in green ash plantations, and the number of tons of carbon that can be sequestered. The profitability of green ash is $2,342 and $3,645 per acre on site indices (measurement of soil quality) 65 and 105 land, respectively, calculated with a 2.5% alternative rate of return (ARR). These figures shift to –$248 and –$240 calculated with a 15.0% ARR. If landowners who have an ARR of 2.5% can sell carbon credits for $10 per ton of carbon, profits will increase by $107 per acre on poor sites and $242 on good sites. Over one rotation (cutting cycle), 38.56 net tons of carbon can be sequestered on an acre of poor quality land and 51.35 tons on good quality land. The cost of sequestering carbon, without including revenues from timber production and carbon credits, ranges from a high of $15.20 per ton on poor sites to $14.41 on good sites, calculated with a 2.5% ARR; to a high of $8.51 per ton on poor sites to $7.63 on good sites, calculated with a 15.0% ARR. The cost of storing carbon can be reduced significantly if the trees can be sold for wood products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59748622018-06-10 Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley Huang, Ching-Hsun Kronrad, Gary D. Cheng, Shiaolin D. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO(2)), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO(2). Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching to alternative energy sources, increasing efficiency, or offsetting carbon emissions. This study determined the cost and profitability of sequestering carbon in green ash plantations, and the number of tons of carbon that can be sequestered. The profitability of green ash is $2,342 and $3,645 per acre on site indices (measurement of soil quality) 65 and 105 land, respectively, calculated with a 2.5% alternative rate of return (ARR). These figures shift to –$248 and –$240 calculated with a 15.0% ARR. If landowners who have an ARR of 2.5% can sell carbon credits for $10 per ton of carbon, profits will increase by $107 per acre on poor sites and $242 on good sites. Over one rotation (cutting cycle), 38.56 net tons of carbon can be sequestered on an acre of poor quality land and 51.35 tons on good quality land. The cost of sequestering carbon, without including revenues from timber production and carbon credits, ranges from a high of $15.20 per ton on poor sites to $14.41 on good sites, calculated with a 2.5% ARR; to a high of $8.51 per ton on poor sites to $7.63 on good sites, calculated with a 15.0% ARR. The cost of storing carbon can be reduced significantly if the trees can be sold for wood products. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2003-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5974862/ /pubmed/12941973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.61 Text en Copyright © 2003 Ching-Hsun Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Ching-Hsun
Kronrad, Gary D.
Cheng, Shiaolin D.
Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
title Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
title_full Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
title_fullStr Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
title_full_unstemmed Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
title_short Economic Analysis of Sequestering Carbon in Green Ash Forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
title_sort economic analysis of sequestering carbon in green ash forests in the lower mississippi river valley
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12941973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.61
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchinghsun economicanalysisofsequesteringcarboningreenashforestsinthelowermississippirivervalley
AT kronradgaryd economicanalysisofsequesteringcarboningreenashforestsinthelowermississippirivervalley
AT chengshiaolind economicanalysisofsequesteringcarboningreenashforestsinthelowermississippirivervalley