Cargando…

A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). METHODS: Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gault, Laura M., Ritchie, Craig W., Robieson, Weining Z., Pritchett, Yili, Othman, Ahmed A., Lenz, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.001
_version_ 1783326924062326784
author Gault, Laura M.
Ritchie, Craig W.
Robieson, Weining Z.
Pritchett, Yili
Othman, Ahmed A.
Lenz, Robert A.
author_facet Gault, Laura M.
Ritchie, Craig W.
Robieson, Weining Z.
Pritchett, Yili
Othman, Ahmed A.
Lenz, Robert A.
author_sort Gault, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). METHODS: Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg once daily), donepezil 10 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to final evaluation in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) total score. RESULTS: A total of 274 subjects were randomized. Although the study did not meet its primary end point, trends toward improvement were seen with ABT-126 25 mg (least squares mean [standard error] difference from placebo −1.19 [0.90]; one-sided P = .095) and donepezil (−1.43 [0.90]; one-sided P = .057) on the 11-item ADAS-Cog total score change from baseline to the final evaluation. ABT-126 5 mg was numerically similar to placebo. An exposure-response analysis indicated a statistically significant relationship between ABT-126 exposure and the change from baseline in ADAS-Cog, with no evidence of a plateau. No clinically meaningful differences in safety were observed among treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Although the ABT-126 25 mg dose did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement, results of the exposure-response analysis suggest that higher doses may produce better efficacy, and the safety profile of ABT-126 in this study supports additional studies with higher doses in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER: NCT00948909.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59749732018-05-31 A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia Gault, Laura M. Ritchie, Craig W. Robieson, Weining Z. Pritchett, Yili Othman, Ahmed A. Lenz, Robert A. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Featured Article INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). METHODS: Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg once daily), donepezil 10 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to final evaluation in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) total score. RESULTS: A total of 274 subjects were randomized. Although the study did not meet its primary end point, trends toward improvement were seen with ABT-126 25 mg (least squares mean [standard error] difference from placebo −1.19 [0.90]; one-sided P = .095) and donepezil (−1.43 [0.90]; one-sided P = .057) on the 11-item ADAS-Cog total score change from baseline to the final evaluation. ABT-126 5 mg was numerically similar to placebo. An exposure-response analysis indicated a statistically significant relationship between ABT-126 exposure and the change from baseline in ADAS-Cog, with no evidence of a plateau. No clinically meaningful differences in safety were observed among treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Although the ABT-126 25 mg dose did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement, results of the exposure-response analysis suggest that higher doses may produce better efficacy, and the safety profile of ABT-126 in this study supports additional studies with higher doses in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER: NCT00948909. Elsevier 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5974973/ /pubmed/29854928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.001 Text en © 2015 AbbVie Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Featured Article
Gault, Laura M.
Ritchie, Craig W.
Robieson, Weining Z.
Pritchett, Yili
Othman, Ahmed A.
Lenz, Robert A.
A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
title A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
title_full A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
title_fullStr A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
title_full_unstemmed A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
title_short A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
title_sort phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist abt-126 in mild-to-moderate alzheimer's dementia
topic Featured Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.001
work_keys_str_mv AT gaultlauram aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT ritchiecraigw aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT robiesonweiningz aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT pritchettyili aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT othmanahmeda aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT lenzroberta aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT gaultlauram phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT ritchiecraigw phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT robiesonweiningz phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT pritchettyili phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT othmanahmeda phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia
AT lenzroberta phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia