Cargando…
A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). METHODS: Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.001 |
_version_ | 1783326924062326784 |
---|---|
author | Gault, Laura M. Ritchie, Craig W. Robieson, Weining Z. Pritchett, Yili Othman, Ahmed A. Lenz, Robert A. |
author_facet | Gault, Laura M. Ritchie, Craig W. Robieson, Weining Z. Pritchett, Yili Othman, Ahmed A. Lenz, Robert A. |
author_sort | Gault, Laura M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). METHODS: Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg once daily), donepezil 10 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to final evaluation in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) total score. RESULTS: A total of 274 subjects were randomized. Although the study did not meet its primary end point, trends toward improvement were seen with ABT-126 25 mg (least squares mean [standard error] difference from placebo −1.19 [0.90]; one-sided P = .095) and donepezil (−1.43 [0.90]; one-sided P = .057) on the 11-item ADAS-Cog total score change from baseline to the final evaluation. ABT-126 5 mg was numerically similar to placebo. An exposure-response analysis indicated a statistically significant relationship between ABT-126 exposure and the change from baseline in ADAS-Cog, with no evidence of a plateau. No clinically meaningful differences in safety were observed among treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Although the ABT-126 25 mg dose did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement, results of the exposure-response analysis suggest that higher doses may produce better efficacy, and the safety profile of ABT-126 in this study supports additional studies with higher doses in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER: NCT00948909. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5974973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59749732018-05-31 A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia Gault, Laura M. Ritchie, Craig W. Robieson, Weining Z. Pritchett, Yili Othman, Ahmed A. Lenz, Robert A. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Featured Article INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). METHODS: Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg once daily), donepezil 10 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to final evaluation in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) total score. RESULTS: A total of 274 subjects were randomized. Although the study did not meet its primary end point, trends toward improvement were seen with ABT-126 25 mg (least squares mean [standard error] difference from placebo −1.19 [0.90]; one-sided P = .095) and donepezil (−1.43 [0.90]; one-sided P = .057) on the 11-item ADAS-Cog total score change from baseline to the final evaluation. ABT-126 5 mg was numerically similar to placebo. An exposure-response analysis indicated a statistically significant relationship between ABT-126 exposure and the change from baseline in ADAS-Cog, with no evidence of a plateau. No clinically meaningful differences in safety were observed among treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Although the ABT-126 25 mg dose did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement, results of the exposure-response analysis suggest that higher doses may produce better efficacy, and the safety profile of ABT-126 in this study supports additional studies with higher doses in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER: NCT00948909. Elsevier 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5974973/ /pubmed/29854928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.001 Text en © 2015 AbbVie Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Featured Article Gault, Laura M. Ritchie, Craig W. Robieson, Weining Z. Pritchett, Yili Othman, Ahmed A. Lenz, Robert A. A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia |
title | A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia |
title_full | A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia |
title_fullStr | A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia |
title_short | A phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia |
title_sort | phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist abt-126 in mild-to-moderate alzheimer's dementia |
topic | Featured Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaultlauram aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT ritchiecraigw aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT robiesonweiningz aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT pritchettyili aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT othmanahmeda aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT lenzroberta aphase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT gaultlauram phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT ritchiecraigw phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT robiesonweiningz phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT pritchettyili phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT othmanahmeda phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia AT lenzroberta phase2randomizedcontrolledtrialofthea7agonistabt126inmildtomoderatealzheimersdementia |