Cargando…

The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship

BACKGROUND: Numerous methods have been proposed that use submaximal loads to predict one repetition maximum (1RM). One common method applies standard linear regression equations to load and average vertical lifting velocity (V(mean)) data developed during squat jumps or three bench press throw (BP-T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayers, Mark G. L., Schlaeppi, Michel, Hitz, Marina, Lorenzetti, Silvio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0099-z
_version_ 1783326978880831488
author Sayers, Mark G. L.
Schlaeppi, Michel
Hitz, Marina
Lorenzetti, Silvio
author_facet Sayers, Mark G. L.
Schlaeppi, Michel
Hitz, Marina
Lorenzetti, Silvio
author_sort Sayers, Mark G. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous methods have been proposed that use submaximal loads to predict one repetition maximum (1RM). One common method applies standard linear regression equations to load and average vertical lifting velocity (V(mean)) data developed during squat jumps or three bench press throw (BP-T). The main aim of this project was to determine which combination of three submaximal loads during BP-T result in the most accurate prediction of 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength in healthy individuals. METHODS: In this study combinations of three BP-T loads were used to predict 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength. Additionally, we examined whether regression models developed using peak vertical bar velocity (V(peak)), rather than V(mean), provide the most accurate prediction of Smith Machine bench press 1RM. 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength was measured directly in 12 healthy regular weight trainers (body mass = 80.8 ± 5.7 kg). Two to three days later a linear position transducer attached to the collars on a Smith Machine was used to record V(mean) and V(peak) during BP-T between 30 and 70% of 1RM (10% increments). RESULTS: Repeated measures analysis of variance testing showed that the mean values for slope and ordinate intercept for the regression models at each of the load ranges differed significantly depending on whether V(mean) or V(peak) were used in the prediction models (P < 0.001). Conversely, the abscissa intercept did not differ significantly between either measure of vertical bar velocity at each load range. The key finding in this study was that 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength can be determined with high relative accuracy by examining V(mean) and V(peak) during BP-T over three loads, with the most precise models using V(peak) during loads representing 30, 40 and 50% of 1RM (R(2) = 0.96, SSE = 4.2 kg). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicate that exercise programmers working with normal healthy populations can accurately predict Smith Machine 1RM bench press strength using relatively light load Smith Machine BP-T testing, avoiding the need to expose their clients to potentially injurious loads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59754202018-05-31 The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship Sayers, Mark G. L. Schlaeppi, Michel Hitz, Marina Lorenzetti, Silvio BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Numerous methods have been proposed that use submaximal loads to predict one repetition maximum (1RM). One common method applies standard linear regression equations to load and average vertical lifting velocity (V(mean)) data developed during squat jumps or three bench press throw (BP-T). The main aim of this project was to determine which combination of three submaximal loads during BP-T result in the most accurate prediction of 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength in healthy individuals. METHODS: In this study combinations of three BP-T loads were used to predict 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength. Additionally, we examined whether regression models developed using peak vertical bar velocity (V(peak)), rather than V(mean), provide the most accurate prediction of Smith Machine bench press 1RM. 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength was measured directly in 12 healthy regular weight trainers (body mass = 80.8 ± 5.7 kg). Two to three days later a linear position transducer attached to the collars on a Smith Machine was used to record V(mean) and V(peak) during BP-T between 30 and 70% of 1RM (10% increments). RESULTS: Repeated measures analysis of variance testing showed that the mean values for slope and ordinate intercept for the regression models at each of the load ranges differed significantly depending on whether V(mean) or V(peak) were used in the prediction models (P < 0.001). Conversely, the abscissa intercept did not differ significantly between either measure of vertical bar velocity at each load range. The key finding in this study was that 1RM Smith Machine bench press strength can be determined with high relative accuracy by examining V(mean) and V(peak) during BP-T over three loads, with the most precise models using V(peak) during loads representing 30, 40 and 50% of 1RM (R(2) = 0.96, SSE = 4.2 kg). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicate that exercise programmers working with normal healthy populations can accurately predict Smith Machine 1RM bench press strength using relatively light load Smith Machine BP-T testing, avoiding the need to expose their clients to potentially injurious loads. BioMed Central 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5975420/ /pubmed/29854409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0099-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Sayers, Mark G. L.
Schlaeppi, Michel
Hitz, Marina
Lorenzetti, Silvio
The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship
title The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship
title_full The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship
title_fullStr The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship
title_full_unstemmed The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship
title_short The impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1RM prediction using the load-velocity relationship
title_sort impact of test loads on the accuracy of 1rm prediction using the load-velocity relationship
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0099-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sayersmarkgl theimpactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT schlaeppimichel theimpactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT hitzmarina theimpactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT lorenzettisilvio theimpactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT sayersmarkgl impactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT schlaeppimichel impactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT hitzmarina impactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship
AT lorenzettisilvio impactoftestloadsontheaccuracyof1rmpredictionusingtheloadvelocityrelationship