Cargando…

Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND: Free fatty acids (FFAs) predicted the risk of heart failure (HF) and were elevated in HF with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether total levels of FFA in plasma differed in patients with HF with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Ning, Jiang, Wenbing, Wang, Yi, Wu, Youyang, Chen, Hao, Zhao, Xuyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0850-0
_version_ 1783326979580231680
author Zhu, Ning
Jiang, Wenbing
Wang, Yi
Wu, Youyang
Chen, Hao
Zhao, Xuyong
author_facet Zhu, Ning
Jiang, Wenbing
Wang, Yi
Wu, Youyang
Chen, Hao
Zhao, Xuyong
author_sort Zhu, Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Free fatty acids (FFAs) predicted the risk of heart failure (HF) and were elevated in HF with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether total levels of FFA in plasma differed in patients with HF with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and the association with the three categories. METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF were investigated in this study. Plasma FFA levels were measured using commercially available assay kits, and LVEF was calculated by echocardiography with the Simpson biplane method. Dyspnea ranked by New York Heart Association (NYHA) was also identified. RESULTS: FFA concentrations were higher in HFrEF than in HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively (689 ± 321.5 μmol/L vs. 537.9 ± 221.6 μmol/L, p = 0.036; 689 ± 321.5 μmol/L vs. 527.5 ± 185.5 μmol/L, p = 0.008). No significant differences in FFA levels were found between HFmrEF and HFpEF (537.9 ± 221.6 μmol/L vs. 527.5 ± 185.5 μmol/L, p = 0.619). In addition, we found a negative correlation between FFA levels and LVEF (regression coefficient: − 0.229, p = 0.004) and a positive correlation between FFAs and NYHA class (regression coefficient: 0.214, p = 0.014) after adjustment for clinical characteristic, medical history and therapies. ROC analysis revealed that FFAs predicted HFrEF across the three categories (AUC: 0.644, p = 0.005) and the optimal cut-off level to predict HFrEF was FFA levels above 575 μmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: FFA levels differed across the three categories, which suggests that energy metabolism differs between HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59754232018-05-31 Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction Zhu, Ning Jiang, Wenbing Wang, Yi Wu, Youyang Chen, Hao Zhao, Xuyong BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Free fatty acids (FFAs) predicted the risk of heart failure (HF) and were elevated in HF with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether total levels of FFA in plasma differed in patients with HF with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and the association with the three categories. METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF were investigated in this study. Plasma FFA levels were measured using commercially available assay kits, and LVEF was calculated by echocardiography with the Simpson biplane method. Dyspnea ranked by New York Heart Association (NYHA) was also identified. RESULTS: FFA concentrations were higher in HFrEF than in HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively (689 ± 321.5 μmol/L vs. 537.9 ± 221.6 μmol/L, p = 0.036; 689 ± 321.5 μmol/L vs. 527.5 ± 185.5 μmol/L, p = 0.008). No significant differences in FFA levels were found between HFmrEF and HFpEF (537.9 ± 221.6 μmol/L vs. 527.5 ± 185.5 μmol/L, p = 0.619). In addition, we found a negative correlation between FFA levels and LVEF (regression coefficient: − 0.229, p = 0.004) and a positive correlation between FFAs and NYHA class (regression coefficient: 0.214, p = 0.014) after adjustment for clinical characteristic, medical history and therapies. ROC analysis revealed that FFAs predicted HFrEF across the three categories (AUC: 0.644, p = 0.005) and the optimal cut-off level to predict HFrEF was FFA levels above 575 μmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: FFA levels differed across the three categories, which suggests that energy metabolism differs between HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF. BioMed Central 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5975423/ /pubmed/29843618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0850-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Ning
Jiang, Wenbing
Wang, Yi
Wu, Youyang
Chen, Hao
Zhao, Xuyong
Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
title Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
title_full Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
title_fullStr Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
title_short Plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
title_sort plasma levels of free fatty acid differ in patients with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0850-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuning plasmalevelsoffreefattyaciddifferinpatientswithleftventricularpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfraction
AT jiangwenbing plasmalevelsoffreefattyaciddifferinpatientswithleftventricularpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfraction
AT wangyi plasmalevelsoffreefattyaciddifferinpatientswithleftventricularpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfraction
AT wuyouyang plasmalevelsoffreefattyaciddifferinpatientswithleftventricularpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfraction
AT chenhao plasmalevelsoffreefattyaciddifferinpatientswithleftventricularpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfraction
AT zhaoxuyong plasmalevelsoffreefattyaciddifferinpatientswithleftventricularpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfraction