Cargando…

Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up

Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herbert, Robert D., Kasza, Jessica, Bø, Kari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5
_version_ 1783326988055871488
author Herbert, Robert D.
Kasza, Jessica
Bø, Kari
author_facet Herbert, Robert D.
Kasza, Jessica
Bø, Kari
author_sort Herbert, Robert D.
collection PubMed
description Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59754602018-05-31 Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up Herbert, Robert D. Kasza, Jessica Bø, Kari BMC Med Res Methodol Debate Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up. BioMed Central 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5975460/ /pubmed/29843614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Herbert, Robert D.
Kasza, Jessica
Bø, Kari
Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
title Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
title_full Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
title_fullStr Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
title_short Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
title_sort analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5
work_keys_str_mv AT herbertrobertd analysisofrandomisedtrialswithlongtermfollowup
AT kaszajessica analysisofrandomisedtrialswithlongtermfollowup
AT bøkari analysisofrandomisedtrialswithlongtermfollowup