Cargando…

Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011

BACKGROUND: Although low birthweight (LBW) babies represent only 15.5% of global births, it is the leading underlying cause of deaths among newborns in countries where neonatal mortality rates are high. In Uganda, like many other sub-Saharan African countries, the progress of reducing neonatal morta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arunda, Malachi Ochieng, Agardh, Anette, Asamoah, Benedict Oppong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1831-0
_version_ 1783326997389246464
author Arunda, Malachi Ochieng
Agardh, Anette
Asamoah, Benedict Oppong
author_facet Arunda, Malachi Ochieng
Agardh, Anette
Asamoah, Benedict Oppong
author_sort Arunda, Malachi Ochieng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although low birthweight (LBW) babies represent only 15.5% of global births, it is the leading underlying cause of deaths among newborns in countries where neonatal mortality rates are high. In Uganda, like many other sub-Saharan African countries, the progress of reducing neonatal mortality has been slow and the contribution of low birthweight to neonatal deaths over time is unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between low birthweight and neonatal mortality and to determine the trends of neonatal deaths attributable to low birthweight in Uganda between 1995 and 2011. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey datasets from Uganda Demographic and Health Surveys between 1995 and 2011 were analyzed using binary logistic regression with 95% confidence interval (CI) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to examine associations and trends of neonatal mortalities with respect to LBW. A total of 5973 singleton last-born live births with measured birthweights were included in the study. RESULTS: The odds of mortality among low birthweight neonates relative to normal birthweight babies were; in 1995, 6.2 (95% CI 2.3 −17.0), in 2000–2001, 5.3 (95% CI 1.7 −16.1), in 2006, 4.3 (95% CI 1.3 − 14.2) and in 2011, 3.8 (95% CI 1.3 − 11.2). The proportion of neonatal deaths attributable to LBW in the entire population declined by more than half, from 33.6% in 1995 to 15.3% in 2011. Neonatal mortality among LBW newborns also declined from 83.8% to 73.7% during the same period. CONCLUSION: Low birthweight contributes to a substantial proportion of neonatal deaths in Uganda. Although significant progress has been made to reduce newborn deaths, about three-quarters of all LBW neonates died in the neonatal period by 2011. This implies that the health system has been inadequate in its efforts to save LBW babies. A holistic strategy of community level interventions such as improved nutrition for pregnant mothers, prevention of teenage pregnancies, use of mosquito nets during pregnancy, antenatal care for all, adequate skilled care during birth to prevent birth asphyxia among LBW babies, and enhanced quality of postnatal care among others could effectively reduce the mortality numbers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59755002018-05-31 Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011 Arunda, Malachi Ochieng Agardh, Anette Asamoah, Benedict Oppong BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Although low birthweight (LBW) babies represent only 15.5% of global births, it is the leading underlying cause of deaths among newborns in countries where neonatal mortality rates are high. In Uganda, like many other sub-Saharan African countries, the progress of reducing neonatal mortality has been slow and the contribution of low birthweight to neonatal deaths over time is unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between low birthweight and neonatal mortality and to determine the trends of neonatal deaths attributable to low birthweight in Uganda between 1995 and 2011. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey datasets from Uganda Demographic and Health Surveys between 1995 and 2011 were analyzed using binary logistic regression with 95% confidence interval (CI) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to examine associations and trends of neonatal mortalities with respect to LBW. A total of 5973 singleton last-born live births with measured birthweights were included in the study. RESULTS: The odds of mortality among low birthweight neonates relative to normal birthweight babies were; in 1995, 6.2 (95% CI 2.3 −17.0), in 2000–2001, 5.3 (95% CI 1.7 −16.1), in 2006, 4.3 (95% CI 1.3 − 14.2) and in 2011, 3.8 (95% CI 1.3 − 11.2). The proportion of neonatal deaths attributable to LBW in the entire population declined by more than half, from 33.6% in 1995 to 15.3% in 2011. Neonatal mortality among LBW newborns also declined from 83.8% to 73.7% during the same period. CONCLUSION: Low birthweight contributes to a substantial proportion of neonatal deaths in Uganda. Although significant progress has been made to reduce newborn deaths, about three-quarters of all LBW neonates died in the neonatal period by 2011. This implies that the health system has been inadequate in its efforts to save LBW babies. A holistic strategy of community level interventions such as improved nutrition for pregnant mothers, prevention of teenage pregnancies, use of mosquito nets during pregnancy, antenatal care for all, adequate skilled care during birth to prevent birth asphyxia among LBW babies, and enhanced quality of postnatal care among others could effectively reduce the mortality numbers. BioMed Central 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5975500/ /pubmed/29843626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1831-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arunda, Malachi Ochieng
Agardh, Anette
Asamoah, Benedict Oppong
Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
title Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
title_full Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
title_fullStr Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
title_full_unstemmed Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
title_short Survival of low birthweight neonates in Uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
title_sort survival of low birthweight neonates in uganda: analysis of progress between 1995 and 2011
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1831-0
work_keys_str_mv AT arundamalachiochieng survivaloflowbirthweightneonatesinugandaanalysisofprogressbetween1995and2011
AT agardhanette survivaloflowbirthweightneonatesinugandaanalysisofprogressbetween1995and2011
AT asamoahbenedictoppong survivaloflowbirthweightneonatesinugandaanalysisofprogressbetween1995and2011