Cargando…

Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction

BACKGROUND: Electrical vasoconstriction is a promising approach to control blood pressure or restrict bleeding in non-compressible wounds. We explore the neural and non-neural pathways of electrical vasoconstriction in-vivo. METHODS: Charge-balanced, asymmetric pulses were delivered through a pair o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinton, Mark, Mandel, Yossi, Schachar, Ira, Palanker, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0390-y
_version_ 1783327014630981632
author Brinton, Mark
Mandel, Yossi
Schachar, Ira
Palanker, Daniel
author_facet Brinton, Mark
Mandel, Yossi
Schachar, Ira
Palanker, Daniel
author_sort Brinton, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electrical vasoconstriction is a promising approach to control blood pressure or restrict bleeding in non-compressible wounds. We explore the neural and non-neural pathways of electrical vasoconstriction in-vivo. METHODS: Charge-balanced, asymmetric pulses were delivered through a pair of metal disc electrodes. Vasoconstriction was assessed by measuring the diameter of rat saphenous vessels stimulated with low-voltage (20 V, 1 ms) and high-voltage (150 V, 10 μs) stimuli at 10 Hz for 5 min. Activation pathways were explored by topical application of a specific neural agonist (phenylephrine, alpha-1 receptor), a non-specific agonist (KCl) and neural inhibitors (phenoxybenzamine, 25 mg/ml; guanethidine, 1 mg/ml). Acute tissue damage was assessed with a membrane permeability (live-dead) fluorescent assay. The Joule heating in tissue was estimated using COMSOL Multiphysics modeling. RESULTS: During stimulation, arteries constricted to 41 ± 8% and 37 ± 6% of their pre-stimulus diameter with low- and high-voltage stimuli, while veins constricted to 80 ± 18% and 40 ± 11%, respectively. In arteries, despite similar extent of constriction, the recovery time was very different: about 30 s for low-voltage and 10 min for high-voltage stimuli. Neural inhibitors significantly reduced low-voltage arterial constriction, but did not affect high-voltage arterial or venous constriction, indicating that high-voltage stimuli activate non-neural vasoconstriction pathways. Adrenergic pathways predominantly controlled low-voltage arterial but not venous constriction, which may involve a purinergic pathway. Viability staining confirmed that stimuli were below the electroporation threshold. Modeling indicates that heating of the blood vessels during stimulation (< 0.2 °C) is too low to cause vasoconstriction. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that low-voltage stimuli induce reversible vasoconstriction through neural pathways, while high-voltage stimuli activate non-neural pathways, likely in addition to neural stimulation. Different stimuli providing precise control over the extent of arterial and venous constriction as well as relaxation rate could be used to control bleeding, perfusion or blood pressure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59755712018-05-31 Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction Brinton, Mark Mandel, Yossi Schachar, Ira Palanker, Daniel J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Electrical vasoconstriction is a promising approach to control blood pressure or restrict bleeding in non-compressible wounds. We explore the neural and non-neural pathways of electrical vasoconstriction in-vivo. METHODS: Charge-balanced, asymmetric pulses were delivered through a pair of metal disc electrodes. Vasoconstriction was assessed by measuring the diameter of rat saphenous vessels stimulated with low-voltage (20 V, 1 ms) and high-voltage (150 V, 10 μs) stimuli at 10 Hz for 5 min. Activation pathways were explored by topical application of a specific neural agonist (phenylephrine, alpha-1 receptor), a non-specific agonist (KCl) and neural inhibitors (phenoxybenzamine, 25 mg/ml; guanethidine, 1 mg/ml). Acute tissue damage was assessed with a membrane permeability (live-dead) fluorescent assay. The Joule heating in tissue was estimated using COMSOL Multiphysics modeling. RESULTS: During stimulation, arteries constricted to 41 ± 8% and 37 ± 6% of their pre-stimulus diameter with low- and high-voltage stimuli, while veins constricted to 80 ± 18% and 40 ± 11%, respectively. In arteries, despite similar extent of constriction, the recovery time was very different: about 30 s for low-voltage and 10 min for high-voltage stimuli. Neural inhibitors significantly reduced low-voltage arterial constriction, but did not affect high-voltage arterial or venous constriction, indicating that high-voltage stimuli activate non-neural vasoconstriction pathways. Adrenergic pathways predominantly controlled low-voltage arterial but not venous constriction, which may involve a purinergic pathway. Viability staining confirmed that stimuli were below the electroporation threshold. Modeling indicates that heating of the blood vessels during stimulation (< 0.2 °C) is too low to cause vasoconstriction. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that low-voltage stimuli induce reversible vasoconstriction through neural pathways, while high-voltage stimuli activate non-neural pathways, likely in addition to neural stimulation. Different stimuli providing precise control over the extent of arterial and venous constriction as well as relaxation rate could be used to control bleeding, perfusion or blood pressure. BioMed Central 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5975571/ /pubmed/29843762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0390-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brinton, Mark
Mandel, Yossi
Schachar, Ira
Palanker, Daniel
Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
title Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
title_full Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
title_fullStr Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
title_short Mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
title_sort mechanisms of electrical vasoconstriction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0390-y
work_keys_str_mv AT brintonmark mechanismsofelectricalvasoconstriction
AT mandelyossi mechanismsofelectricalvasoconstriction
AT schacharira mechanismsofelectricalvasoconstriction
AT palankerdaniel mechanismsofelectricalvasoconstriction