Cargando…

Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects

BACKGROUND: Getting research into policy and practice in healthcare is a recognised, world-wide concern. As an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice, research funders are requesting more interdisciplinary and collaborative research, while actual experiences of such processes have b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyström, M. E., Karltun, J., Keller, C., Andersson Gäre, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0
_version_ 1783327019536220160
author Nyström, M. E.
Karltun, J.
Keller, C.
Andersson Gäre, B.
author_facet Nyström, M. E.
Karltun, J.
Keller, C.
Andersson Gäre, B.
author_sort Nyström, M. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Getting research into policy and practice in healthcare is a recognised, world-wide concern. As an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice, research funders are requesting more interdisciplinary and collaborative research, while actual experiences of such processes have been less studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to gain more knowledge on the interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research process by investigating researchers’ experiences of and approaches to the process, based on their participation in an inventive national research programme. The programme aimed to boost collaborative and partnership research and build learning structures, while improving ways to lead, manage and develop practices in Swedish health and social services. METHODS: Interviews conducted with project leaders and/or lead researchers and documentation from 20 projects were analysed using directed and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Collaborative approaches were achieved by design, e.g. action research, or by involving practitioners from several levels of the healthcare system in various parts of the research process. The use of dual roles as researcher/clinician or practitioner/PhD student or the use of education designed especially for practitioners or ‘student researchers’ were other approaches. The collaborative process constituted the area for the main lessons learned as well as the main problems. Difficulties concerned handling complexity and conflicts between different expectations and demands in the practitioner’s and researcher’s contexts, and dealing with human resource issues and group interactions when forming collaborative and interdisciplinary research teams. The handling of such challenges required time, resources, knowledge, interactive learning and skilled project management. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative approaches are important in the study of complex phenomena. Results from this study show that allocated time, arenas for interactions and skills in project management and communication are needed during research collaboration to ensure support and build trust and understanding with involved practitioners at several levels in the healthcare system. For researchers, dealing with this complexity takes time and energy from the scientific process. For practitioners, this puts demands on understanding a research process and how it fits with on-going organisational agendas and activities and allocating time. Some of the identified factors may be overlooked by funders and involved stakeholders when designing, performing and evaluating interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59755922018-05-31 Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects Nyström, M. E. Karltun, J. Keller, C. Andersson Gäre, B. Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Getting research into policy and practice in healthcare is a recognised, world-wide concern. As an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice, research funders are requesting more interdisciplinary and collaborative research, while actual experiences of such processes have been less studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to gain more knowledge on the interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research process by investigating researchers’ experiences of and approaches to the process, based on their participation in an inventive national research programme. The programme aimed to boost collaborative and partnership research and build learning structures, while improving ways to lead, manage and develop practices in Swedish health and social services. METHODS: Interviews conducted with project leaders and/or lead researchers and documentation from 20 projects were analysed using directed and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Collaborative approaches were achieved by design, e.g. action research, or by involving practitioners from several levels of the healthcare system in various parts of the research process. The use of dual roles as researcher/clinician or practitioner/PhD student or the use of education designed especially for practitioners or ‘student researchers’ were other approaches. The collaborative process constituted the area for the main lessons learned as well as the main problems. Difficulties concerned handling complexity and conflicts between different expectations and demands in the practitioner’s and researcher’s contexts, and dealing with human resource issues and group interactions when forming collaborative and interdisciplinary research teams. The handling of such challenges required time, resources, knowledge, interactive learning and skilled project management. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative approaches are important in the study of complex phenomena. Results from this study show that allocated time, arenas for interactions and skills in project management and communication are needed during research collaboration to ensure support and build trust and understanding with involved practitioners at several levels in the healthcare system. For researchers, dealing with this complexity takes time and energy from the scientific process. For practitioners, this puts demands on understanding a research process and how it fits with on-going organisational agendas and activities and allocating time. Some of the identified factors may be overlooked by funders and involved stakeholders when designing, performing and evaluating interdisciplinary, collaborative and partnership research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5975592/ /pubmed/29843735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nyström, M. E.
Karltun, J.
Keller, C.
Andersson Gäre, B.
Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
title Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
title_full Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
title_fullStr Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
title_short Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
title_sort collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0
work_keys_str_mv AT nystromme collaborativeandpartnershipresearchforimprovementofhealthandsocialservicesresearchersexperiencesfrom20projects
AT karltunj collaborativeandpartnershipresearchforimprovementofhealthandsocialservicesresearchersexperiencesfrom20projects
AT kellerc collaborativeandpartnershipresearchforimprovementofhealthandsocialservicesresearchersexperiencesfrom20projects
AT anderssongareb collaborativeandpartnershipresearchforimprovementofhealthandsocialservicesresearchersexperiencesfrom20projects