Cargando…

Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints

OBJECTIVES: We report the in vitro activity of amikacin and comparators against Gram-negative bacteria collected from blood and respiratory specimens in China during a 1-year period between December 2015 and December 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuti, Joseph L, Wang, Qi, Chen, Hongbin, Li, Henan, Wang, Hui, Nicolau, David P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29872328
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S161636
_version_ 1783327020735791104
author Kuti, Joseph L
Wang, Qi
Chen, Hongbin
Li, Henan
Wang, Hui
Nicolau, David P
author_facet Kuti, Joseph L
Wang, Qi
Chen, Hongbin
Li, Henan
Wang, Hui
Nicolau, David P
author_sort Kuti, Joseph L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We report the in vitro activity of amikacin and comparators against Gram-negative bacteria collected from blood and respiratory specimens in China during a 1-year period between December 2015 and December 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by agar dilution methods using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, and susceptibility was assessed using CLSI breakpoints, except for tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae. A pharmacodynamic threshold MIC ≤ 256 mg/L was also applied for amikacin since its inhalation formulation has demonstrated activity up to these MICs. RESULTS: For Escherichia coli, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates (45.7% of population), amikacin demonstrated excellent activity (93.0%–94.7% susceptible) similar to tigecycline, piperacillin/tazobactam, and the carbapenems. Against Klebsiella pneumoniae, only tigecycline retained susceptibility >90%; amikacin inhibited 83.7% and 71.1% of the total and ESBL-producing (24.2%) populations at its breakpoint, respectively. Amikacin susceptibility against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 91.1%, and only polymyxin B (100%) achieved higher susceptibility rates. Susceptibility declined to 80.9% and 54.5% against carbapenem- and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, respectively. Finally, MDR was very common (84.0%) among Acinetobacter baumannii, with amikacin susceptibility at 30.5% for all isolates and 17.3% for MDR isolates. Since the majority of the amikacin-resistant isolates had amikacin MICs > 256 mg/L, the use of the inhalation pharmacodynamic threshold did not substantially improve the CLSI susceptible value. CONCLUSION: Amikacin portrayed comparable or better susceptibility rates to most of the tested antibiotics against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii in China. As few isolates had MICs of 32–256 mg/L, use of the CLSI breakpoint and inhalation pharmacodynamic threshold yielded similar overall susceptibilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59755982018-06-05 Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints Kuti, Joseph L Wang, Qi Chen, Hongbin Li, Henan Wang, Hui Nicolau, David P Infect Drug Resist Original Research OBJECTIVES: We report the in vitro activity of amikacin and comparators against Gram-negative bacteria collected from blood and respiratory specimens in China during a 1-year period between December 2015 and December 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by agar dilution methods using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, and susceptibility was assessed using CLSI breakpoints, except for tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae. A pharmacodynamic threshold MIC ≤ 256 mg/L was also applied for amikacin since its inhalation formulation has demonstrated activity up to these MICs. RESULTS: For Escherichia coli, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates (45.7% of population), amikacin demonstrated excellent activity (93.0%–94.7% susceptible) similar to tigecycline, piperacillin/tazobactam, and the carbapenems. Against Klebsiella pneumoniae, only tigecycline retained susceptibility >90%; amikacin inhibited 83.7% and 71.1% of the total and ESBL-producing (24.2%) populations at its breakpoint, respectively. Amikacin susceptibility against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 91.1%, and only polymyxin B (100%) achieved higher susceptibility rates. Susceptibility declined to 80.9% and 54.5% against carbapenem- and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, respectively. Finally, MDR was very common (84.0%) among Acinetobacter baumannii, with amikacin susceptibility at 30.5% for all isolates and 17.3% for MDR isolates. Since the majority of the amikacin-resistant isolates had amikacin MICs > 256 mg/L, the use of the inhalation pharmacodynamic threshold did not substantially improve the CLSI susceptible value. CONCLUSION: Amikacin portrayed comparable or better susceptibility rates to most of the tested antibiotics against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii in China. As few isolates had MICs of 32–256 mg/L, use of the CLSI breakpoint and inhalation pharmacodynamic threshold yielded similar overall susceptibilities. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5975598/ /pubmed/29872328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S161636 Text en © 2018 Kuti et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kuti, Joseph L
Wang, Qi
Chen, Hongbin
Li, Henan
Wang, Hui
Nicolau, David P
Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints
title Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints
title_full Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints
title_fullStr Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints
title_full_unstemmed Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints
title_short Defining the potency of amikacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii derived from Chinese hospitals using CLSI and inhalation-based breakpoints
title_sort defining the potency of amikacin against escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumoniae, pseudomonas aeruginosa, and acinetobacter baumannii derived from chinese hospitals using clsi and inhalation-based breakpoints
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29872328
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S161636
work_keys_str_mv AT kutijosephl definingthepotencyofamikacinagainstescherichiacoliklebsiellapneumoniaepseudomonasaeruginosaandacinetobacterbaumanniiderivedfromchinesehospitalsusingclsiandinhalationbasedbreakpoints
AT wangqi definingthepotencyofamikacinagainstescherichiacoliklebsiellapneumoniaepseudomonasaeruginosaandacinetobacterbaumanniiderivedfromchinesehospitalsusingclsiandinhalationbasedbreakpoints
AT chenhongbin definingthepotencyofamikacinagainstescherichiacoliklebsiellapneumoniaepseudomonasaeruginosaandacinetobacterbaumanniiderivedfromchinesehospitalsusingclsiandinhalationbasedbreakpoints
AT lihenan definingthepotencyofamikacinagainstescherichiacoliklebsiellapneumoniaepseudomonasaeruginosaandacinetobacterbaumanniiderivedfromchinesehospitalsusingclsiandinhalationbasedbreakpoints
AT wanghui definingthepotencyofamikacinagainstescherichiacoliklebsiellapneumoniaepseudomonasaeruginosaandacinetobacterbaumanniiderivedfromchinesehospitalsusingclsiandinhalationbasedbreakpoints
AT nicolaudavidp definingthepotencyofamikacinagainstescherichiacoliklebsiellapneumoniaepseudomonasaeruginosaandacinetobacterbaumanniiderivedfromchinesehospitalsusingclsiandinhalationbasedbreakpoints