Cargando…

The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks

BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based guidelines can improve clinical and public health outcomes by helping health professionals practice in the most effective manner, as well as assisting policy-makers in designing optimal programs. Adaptation of a guideline to suit the context in which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhicheng, Norris, Susan L., Bero, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0763-4
_version_ 1783327030892298240
author Wang, Zhicheng
Norris, Susan L.
Bero, Lisa
author_facet Wang, Zhicheng
Norris, Susan L.
Bero, Lisa
author_sort Wang, Zhicheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based guidelines can improve clinical and public health outcomes by helping health professionals practice in the most effective manner, as well as assisting policy-makers in designing optimal programs. Adaptation of a guideline to suit the context in which it is intended to be applied can be a key step in the implementation process. Without taking the local context into account, certain interventions recommended in evidence-based guidelines may be infeasible under local conditions. Guideline adaptation frameworks provide a systematic way of approaching adaptation, and their use may increase transparency, methodological rigor, and the quality of the adapted guideline. This paper presents a number of adaptation frameworks that are currently available. We aim to compare the advantages and limitations of their processes, methods, and resource implications. These insights into adaptation frameworks can inform the future development of guidelines and systematic methods to optimize their adaptation. ANALYSIS: Recent adaptation frameworks show an evolution from adapting entire existing guidelines, to adapting specific recommendations extracted from an existing guideline, to constructing evidence tables for each recommendation that needs to be adapted. This is a move towards more recommendation-focused, context-specific processes and considerations. There are still many gaps in knowledge about guideline adaptation. Most of the frameworks reviewed lack any evaluation of the adaptation process and outcomes, including user satisfaction and resources expended. The validity, usability, and health impact of guidelines developed via an adaptation process have not been studied. Lastly, adaptation frameworks have not been evaluated for use in low-income countries. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations in frameworks, a more systematic approach to adaptation based on a framework is valuable, as it helps to ensure that the recommendations stay true to the evidence while taking local needs into account. The utilization of frameworks in the guideline implementation process can be optimized by increasing the understanding and upfront estimation of resource and time needed, capacity building in adaptation methods, and increasing the adaptability of the source recommendation document. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0763-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59756712018-05-31 The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks Wang, Zhicheng Norris, Susan L. Bero, Lisa Implement Sci Debate BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based guidelines can improve clinical and public health outcomes by helping health professionals practice in the most effective manner, as well as assisting policy-makers in designing optimal programs. Adaptation of a guideline to suit the context in which it is intended to be applied can be a key step in the implementation process. Without taking the local context into account, certain interventions recommended in evidence-based guidelines may be infeasible under local conditions. Guideline adaptation frameworks provide a systematic way of approaching adaptation, and their use may increase transparency, methodological rigor, and the quality of the adapted guideline. This paper presents a number of adaptation frameworks that are currently available. We aim to compare the advantages and limitations of their processes, methods, and resource implications. These insights into adaptation frameworks can inform the future development of guidelines and systematic methods to optimize their adaptation. ANALYSIS: Recent adaptation frameworks show an evolution from adapting entire existing guidelines, to adapting specific recommendations extracted from an existing guideline, to constructing evidence tables for each recommendation that needs to be adapted. This is a move towards more recommendation-focused, context-specific processes and considerations. There are still many gaps in knowledge about guideline adaptation. Most of the frameworks reviewed lack any evaluation of the adaptation process and outcomes, including user satisfaction and resources expended. The validity, usability, and health impact of guidelines developed via an adaptation process have not been studied. Lastly, adaptation frameworks have not been evaluated for use in low-income countries. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations in frameworks, a more systematic approach to adaptation based on a framework is valuable, as it helps to ensure that the recommendations stay true to the evidence while taking local needs into account. The utilization of frameworks in the guideline implementation process can be optimized by increasing the understanding and upfront estimation of resource and time needed, capacity building in adaptation methods, and increasing the adaptability of the source recommendation document. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0763-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5975671/ /pubmed/29843737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0763-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Wang, Zhicheng
Norris, Susan L.
Bero, Lisa
The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
title The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
title_full The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
title_fullStr The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
title_full_unstemmed The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
title_short The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
title_sort advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0763-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhicheng theadvantagesandlimitationsofguidelineadaptationframeworks
AT norrissusanl theadvantagesandlimitationsofguidelineadaptationframeworks
AT berolisa theadvantagesandlimitationsofguidelineadaptationframeworks
AT wangzhicheng advantagesandlimitationsofguidelineadaptationframeworks
AT norrissusanl advantagesandlimitationsofguidelineadaptationframeworks
AT berolisa advantagesandlimitationsofguidelineadaptationframeworks