Cargando…

Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To determine whether prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with subsequent systematic plus targeted biopsies for suspicious lesions improve prostate cancer detection compared with standard non-targeting systematic biopsies without mpMRI in biopsy-naïve patients. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Washino, Satoshi, Kobayashi, Shigeru, Okochi, Tomohisa, Kameda, Tomohiro, Konoshi, Tsuzumi, Miyagawa, Tomoaki, Takayama, Tatsuya, Morita, Tatsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0361-4
_version_ 1783327036263104512
author Washino, Satoshi
Kobayashi, Shigeru
Okochi, Tomohisa
Kameda, Tomohiro
Konoshi, Tsuzumi
Miyagawa, Tomoaki
Takayama, Tatsuya
Morita, Tatsuo
author_facet Washino, Satoshi
Kobayashi, Shigeru
Okochi, Tomohisa
Kameda, Tomohiro
Konoshi, Tsuzumi
Miyagawa, Tomoaki
Takayama, Tatsuya
Morita, Tatsuo
author_sort Washino, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine whether prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with subsequent systematic plus targeted biopsies for suspicious lesions improve prostate cancer detection compared with standard non-targeting systematic biopsies without mpMRI in biopsy-naïve patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent their first prostate biopsy due to suspicion of prostate cancer were analyzed retrospectively to compare the biopsy outcomes between patients who received prebiopsy mpMRI (215 patients) and those who did not (281 patients). mpMRI was performed to determine pre-biopsy likelihood of the presence of prostate cancer using a three-point scale (1 = low level of suspicion, 2 = equivocal, and 3 = high level of suspicion). Systematic biopsies were performed in both groups. Targeted biopsies were added for a high level of suspicious lesions on mpMRI. All biopsies were performed by transperineal biopsy technique. After biopsy, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ver. 2 (PIRADS-2) scoring was performed to describe the mpMRI findings and predictive value of PIRADS-2 was evaluated. RESULTS: The detection rate of total and clinically significant prostate cancer was significantly higher in patients who received prebiopsy mpMRI than in those who did not (55.3 and 46.0% vs. 42.0 and 35.2%, respectively; p = 0.004 and p = 0.016). The clinically insignificant prostate cancer detection rate was similar between the two groups (9.3% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.32). Of 86 patients who underwent systematic plus targeted biopsy in the MRI cohort and were diagnosed with prostate cancer, seven patients were detected by addition of targeted biopsy whereas 29 patients were missed by targeted biopsy but detected by systematic biopsy. There was a correlation between the PIRADS-2 and prostate cancer detection rate, and a receiver-operator curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.801 (p <  0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prebiopsy mpMRI with subsequent systematic plus targeted biopsies for suspicious lesions can yield a higher cancer detection rate than non-targeting systematic biopsies. PIRADS-2 scoring is useful for predicting the biopsy outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59756932018-05-31 Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study Washino, Satoshi Kobayashi, Shigeru Okochi, Tomohisa Kameda, Tomohiro Konoshi, Tsuzumi Miyagawa, Tomoaki Takayama, Tatsuya Morita, Tatsuo BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine whether prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with subsequent systematic plus targeted biopsies for suspicious lesions improve prostate cancer detection compared with standard non-targeting systematic biopsies without mpMRI in biopsy-naïve patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent their first prostate biopsy due to suspicion of prostate cancer were analyzed retrospectively to compare the biopsy outcomes between patients who received prebiopsy mpMRI (215 patients) and those who did not (281 patients). mpMRI was performed to determine pre-biopsy likelihood of the presence of prostate cancer using a three-point scale (1 = low level of suspicion, 2 = equivocal, and 3 = high level of suspicion). Systematic biopsies were performed in both groups. Targeted biopsies were added for a high level of suspicious lesions on mpMRI. All biopsies were performed by transperineal biopsy technique. After biopsy, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ver. 2 (PIRADS-2) scoring was performed to describe the mpMRI findings and predictive value of PIRADS-2 was evaluated. RESULTS: The detection rate of total and clinically significant prostate cancer was significantly higher in patients who received prebiopsy mpMRI than in those who did not (55.3 and 46.0% vs. 42.0 and 35.2%, respectively; p = 0.004 and p = 0.016). The clinically insignificant prostate cancer detection rate was similar between the two groups (9.3% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.32). Of 86 patients who underwent systematic plus targeted biopsy in the MRI cohort and were diagnosed with prostate cancer, seven patients were detected by addition of targeted biopsy whereas 29 patients were missed by targeted biopsy but detected by systematic biopsy. There was a correlation between the PIRADS-2 and prostate cancer detection rate, and a receiver-operator curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.801 (p <  0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prebiopsy mpMRI with subsequent systematic plus targeted biopsies for suspicious lesions can yield a higher cancer detection rate than non-targeting systematic biopsies. PIRADS-2 scoring is useful for predicting the biopsy outcome. BioMed Central 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5975693/ /pubmed/29843694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0361-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Washino, Satoshi
Kobayashi, Shigeru
Okochi, Tomohisa
Kameda, Tomohiro
Konoshi, Tsuzumi
Miyagawa, Tomoaki
Takayama, Tatsuya
Morita, Tatsuo
Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
title Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort cancer detection rate of prebiopsy mri with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without mri in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0361-4
work_keys_str_mv AT washinosatoshi cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kobayashishigeru cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT okochitomohisa cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kamedatomohiro cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT konoshitsuzumi cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT miyagawatomoaki cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT takayamatatsuya cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT moritatatsuo cancerdetectionrateofprebiopsymriwithsubsequentsystematicandtargetedbiopsyaresuperiortonontargetingsystematicbiopsywithoutmriinbiopsynaivepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy