Cargando…

A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience

BACKGROUND: Optimal cytoreduction (macroscopic Residual Tumor, RT = 0) is the best survival predictor factor in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It doesn’t exist a consolidated criteria to predict optimal surgical resection at interval debulking surgery (IDS). The aim of this study is to develop a p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghisoni, Eleonora, Katsaros, Dionyssios, Maggiorotto, Furio, Aglietta, Massimo, Vaira, Marco, De Simone, Michele, Mittica, Gloria, Giannone, Gaia, Robella, Manuela, Genta, Sofia, Lucchino, Fabiola, Marocco, Francesco, Borella, Fulvio, Valabrega, Giorgio, Ponzone, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0415-y
_version_ 1783327037202628608
author Ghisoni, Eleonora
Katsaros, Dionyssios
Maggiorotto, Furio
Aglietta, Massimo
Vaira, Marco
De Simone, Michele
Mittica, Gloria
Giannone, Gaia
Robella, Manuela
Genta, Sofia
Lucchino, Fabiola
Marocco, Francesco
Borella, Fulvio
Valabrega, Giorgio
Ponzone, Riccardo
author_facet Ghisoni, Eleonora
Katsaros, Dionyssios
Maggiorotto, Furio
Aglietta, Massimo
Vaira, Marco
De Simone, Michele
Mittica, Gloria
Giannone, Gaia
Robella, Manuela
Genta, Sofia
Lucchino, Fabiola
Marocco, Francesco
Borella, Fulvio
Valabrega, Giorgio
Ponzone, Riccardo
author_sort Ghisoni, Eleonora
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal cytoreduction (macroscopic Residual Tumor, RT = 0) is the best survival predictor factor in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It doesn’t exist a consolidated criteria to predict optimal surgical resection at interval debulking surgery (IDS). The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model of complete cytoreduction at IDS. METHODS: We, retrospectively, analyzed 93 out of 432 patients, with advanced EOC, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and IDS from January 2010 to December 2016 in two referral cancer centers. The correlation between clinical-pathological variables and residual disease at IDS has been investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. A predictive score of cytoreduction (PSC) has been created by combining all significant variables. The performance of each single variable and PSC has been reported and the correlation of all significant variables with progression free survival (PFS) has been assessed. RESULTS: At IDS, 65 patients (69,8%) had complete cytoreduction with no residual disease (R = 0). Three criteria independently predicted R > 0: age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.014), CA-125 before NACT > 550 UI/dl (p = 0.044), and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) > 16 (p < 0.001). A PSC ≥ 3 has been associated with a better accuracy (85,8%), limiting the number of incomplete surgeries to 16,5%. Moreover, a PCI > 16, a PSC ≥ 3 and the presence of R > 0 after IDS were all significantly associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our PSC predicts, in a large number of patients, complete cytoreduction at IDS, limiting the rate of futile extensive surgeries in case of presence of residual tumor (R > 0). The PSC should be prospectively validated in a larger series of EOC patients undergoing NACT-IDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59756982018-05-31 A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience Ghisoni, Eleonora Katsaros, Dionyssios Maggiorotto, Furio Aglietta, Massimo Vaira, Marco De Simone, Michele Mittica, Gloria Giannone, Gaia Robella, Manuela Genta, Sofia Lucchino, Fabiola Marocco, Francesco Borella, Fulvio Valabrega, Giorgio Ponzone, Riccardo J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Optimal cytoreduction (macroscopic Residual Tumor, RT = 0) is the best survival predictor factor in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It doesn’t exist a consolidated criteria to predict optimal surgical resection at interval debulking surgery (IDS). The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model of complete cytoreduction at IDS. METHODS: We, retrospectively, analyzed 93 out of 432 patients, with advanced EOC, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and IDS from January 2010 to December 2016 in two referral cancer centers. The correlation between clinical-pathological variables and residual disease at IDS has been investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. A predictive score of cytoreduction (PSC) has been created by combining all significant variables. The performance of each single variable and PSC has been reported and the correlation of all significant variables with progression free survival (PFS) has been assessed. RESULTS: At IDS, 65 patients (69,8%) had complete cytoreduction with no residual disease (R = 0). Three criteria independently predicted R > 0: age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.014), CA-125 before NACT > 550 UI/dl (p = 0.044), and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) > 16 (p < 0.001). A PSC ≥ 3 has been associated with a better accuracy (85,8%), limiting the number of incomplete surgeries to 16,5%. Moreover, a PCI > 16, a PSC ≥ 3 and the presence of R > 0 after IDS were all significantly associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our PSC predicts, in a large number of patients, complete cytoreduction at IDS, limiting the rate of futile extensive surgeries in case of presence of residual tumor (R > 0). The PSC should be prospectively validated in a larger series of EOC patients undergoing NACT-IDS. BioMed Central 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5975698/ /pubmed/29843747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0415-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ghisoni, Eleonora
Katsaros, Dionyssios
Maggiorotto, Furio
Aglietta, Massimo
Vaira, Marco
De Simone, Michele
Mittica, Gloria
Giannone, Gaia
Robella, Manuela
Genta, Sofia
Lucchino, Fabiola
Marocco, Francesco
Borella, Fulvio
Valabrega, Giorgio
Ponzone, Riccardo
A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_full A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_fullStr A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_full_unstemmed A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_short A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_sort predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29843747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0415-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ghisonieleonora apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT katsarosdionyssios apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT maggiorottofurio apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT agliettamassimo apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT vairamarco apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT desimonemichele apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT mitticagloria apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT giannonegaia apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT robellamanuela apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT gentasofia apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT lucchinofabiola apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT maroccofrancesco apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT borellafulvio apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT valabregagiorgio apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT ponzonericcardo apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT ghisonieleonora predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT katsarosdionyssios predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT maggiorottofurio predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT agliettamassimo predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT vairamarco predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT desimonemichele predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT mitticagloria predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT giannonegaia predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT robellamanuela predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT gentasofia predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT lucchinofabiola predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT maroccofrancesco predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT borellafulvio predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT valabregagiorgio predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT ponzonericcardo predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience