Cargando…

Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions

The strength of CH–aryl interactions (ΔG) in 14 solvents was determined via the conformational analysis of a molecular torsion balance. The molecular balance adopted folded and unfolded conformers in which the ratio of the conformers in solution provided a quantitative measure of ΔG as a function of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emenike, Bright U., Bey, Sara N., Bigelow, Brianna C., Chakravartula, Srinivas V. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03550c
_version_ 1783327091542982656
author Emenike, Bright U.
Bey, Sara N.
Bigelow, Brianna C.
Chakravartula, Srinivas V. S.
author_facet Emenike, Bright U.
Bey, Sara N.
Bigelow, Brianna C.
Chakravartula, Srinivas V. S.
author_sort Emenike, Bright U.
collection PubMed
description The strength of CH–aryl interactions (ΔG) in 14 solvents was determined via the conformational analysis of a molecular torsion balance. The molecular balance adopted folded and unfolded conformers in which the ratio of the conformers in solution provided a quantitative measure of ΔG as a function of solvation. While a single empirical solvent parameter based on solvent polarity failed to explain solvent effect in the molecular balance, it is shown that these ΔG values can be correlated through a multiparameter linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) using the equation introduced by Kamlet and Taft. The resulting LSER equation [ΔG = –0.24 + 0.23α – 0.68β – 0.1π* + 0.09δ]—expresses ΔG as a function of Kamlet–Taft solvent parameters—revealed that specific solvent effects (α and β) are mainly responsible for “tipping” the molecular balance in favour of one conformer over the other, where α represents a solvents' hydrogen-bond acidity and β represents a solvents' hydrogen-bond basicity. Furthermore, using extrapolated data (α and β) and the known π* value for the gas phase, the LSER equation predicted ΔG in the gas phase to be –0.31 kcal mol(–1), which agrees with –0.35 kcal mol(–1) estimated from DFT-D calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5975927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59759272018-06-15 Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions Emenike, Bright U. Bey, Sara N. Bigelow, Brianna C. Chakravartula, Srinivas V. S. Chem Sci Chemistry The strength of CH–aryl interactions (ΔG) in 14 solvents was determined via the conformational analysis of a molecular torsion balance. The molecular balance adopted folded and unfolded conformers in which the ratio of the conformers in solution provided a quantitative measure of ΔG as a function of solvation. While a single empirical solvent parameter based on solvent polarity failed to explain solvent effect in the molecular balance, it is shown that these ΔG values can be correlated through a multiparameter linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) using the equation introduced by Kamlet and Taft. The resulting LSER equation [ΔG = –0.24 + 0.23α – 0.68β – 0.1π* + 0.09δ]—expresses ΔG as a function of Kamlet–Taft solvent parameters—revealed that specific solvent effects (α and β) are mainly responsible for “tipping” the molecular balance in favour of one conformer over the other, where α represents a solvents' hydrogen-bond acidity and β represents a solvents' hydrogen-bond basicity. Furthermore, using extrapolated data (α and β) and the known π* value for the gas phase, the LSER equation predicted ΔG in the gas phase to be –0.31 kcal mol(–1), which agrees with –0.35 kcal mol(–1) estimated from DFT-D calculations. Royal Society of Chemistry 2016-02-01 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5975927/ /pubmed/29910898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03550c Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY 3.0)
spellingShingle Chemistry
Emenike, Bright U.
Bey, Sara N.
Bigelow, Brianna C.
Chakravartula, Srinivas V. S.
Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions
title Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions
title_full Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions
title_fullStr Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions
title_short Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–Aryl interactions
title_sort quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent ch–aryl interactions
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5975927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03550c
work_keys_str_mv AT emenikebrightu quantitativemodelforrationalizingsolventeffectinnoncovalentcharylinteractions
AT beysaran quantitativemodelforrationalizingsolventeffectinnoncovalentcharylinteractions
AT bigelowbriannac quantitativemodelforrationalizingsolventeffectinnoncovalentcharylinteractions
AT chakravartulasrinivasvs quantitativemodelforrationalizingsolventeffectinnoncovalentcharylinteractions