Cargando…

Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts

Molecular gut-content analysis has revolutionized the study of food webs and feeding interactions, allowing the detection of prey DNA within the gut of many organisms. However, successful prey detection is a challenging procedure in which many factors affect every step, starting from the DNA extract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macías-Hernández, Nuria, Athey, Kacie, Tonzo, Vanina, Wangensteen, Owen S., Arnedo, Miquel, Harwood, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29847544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196589
_version_ 1783327123276038144
author Macías-Hernández, Nuria
Athey, Kacie
Tonzo, Vanina
Wangensteen, Owen S.
Arnedo, Miquel
Harwood, James D.
author_facet Macías-Hernández, Nuria
Athey, Kacie
Tonzo, Vanina
Wangensteen, Owen S.
Arnedo, Miquel
Harwood, James D.
author_sort Macías-Hernández, Nuria
collection PubMed
description Molecular gut-content analysis has revolutionized the study of food webs and feeding interactions, allowing the detection of prey DNA within the gut of many organisms. However, successful prey detection is a challenging procedure in which many factors affect every step, starting from the DNA extraction process. Spiders are liquid feeders with branched gut diverticula extending into their legs and throughout the prosoma, thus digestion takes places in different parts of the body and simple gut dissection is not possible. In this study, we investigated differences in prey detectability in DNA extracts from different parts of the spider´s body: legs, prosoma and opisthosoma, using prey-specific PCR and metabarcoding approaches. We performed feeding trials with the woodlouse hunter spider Dysdera verneaui Simon, 1883 (Dysderidae) to estimate the time at which prey DNA is detectable within the predator after feeding. Although we found that all parts of the spider body are suitable for gut-content analysis when using prey-specific PCR approach, results based on metabarcoding suggested the opisthosoma is optimal for detection of predation in spiders because it contained the highest concentration of prey DNA for longer post feeding periods. Other spiders may show different results compared to D. verneaui, but given similarities in the physiology and digestion in different families, it is reasonable to assume this to be common across species and this approach having broad utility across spiders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59761522018-06-17 Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts Macías-Hernández, Nuria Athey, Kacie Tonzo, Vanina Wangensteen, Owen S. Arnedo, Miquel Harwood, James D. PLoS One Research Article Molecular gut-content analysis has revolutionized the study of food webs and feeding interactions, allowing the detection of prey DNA within the gut of many organisms. However, successful prey detection is a challenging procedure in which many factors affect every step, starting from the DNA extraction process. Spiders are liquid feeders with branched gut diverticula extending into their legs and throughout the prosoma, thus digestion takes places in different parts of the body and simple gut dissection is not possible. In this study, we investigated differences in prey detectability in DNA extracts from different parts of the spider´s body: legs, prosoma and opisthosoma, using prey-specific PCR and metabarcoding approaches. We performed feeding trials with the woodlouse hunter spider Dysdera verneaui Simon, 1883 (Dysderidae) to estimate the time at which prey DNA is detectable within the predator after feeding. Although we found that all parts of the spider body are suitable for gut-content analysis when using prey-specific PCR approach, results based on metabarcoding suggested the opisthosoma is optimal for detection of predation in spiders because it contained the highest concentration of prey DNA for longer post feeding periods. Other spiders may show different results compared to D. verneaui, but given similarities in the physiology and digestion in different families, it is reasonable to assume this to be common across species and this approach having broad utility across spiders. Public Library of Science 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5976152/ /pubmed/29847544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196589 Text en © 2018 Macías-Hernández et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Macías-Hernández, Nuria
Athey, Kacie
Tonzo, Vanina
Wangensteen, Owen S.
Arnedo, Miquel
Harwood, James D.
Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
title Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
title_full Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
title_fullStr Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
title_full_unstemmed Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
title_short Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
title_sort molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29847544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196589
work_keys_str_mv AT maciashernandeznuria moleculargutcontentanalysisofdifferentspiderbodyparts
AT atheykacie moleculargutcontentanalysisofdifferentspiderbodyparts
AT tonzovanina moleculargutcontentanalysisofdifferentspiderbodyparts
AT wangensteenowens moleculargutcontentanalysisofdifferentspiderbodyparts
AT arnedomiquel moleculargutcontentanalysisofdifferentspiderbodyparts
AT harwoodjamesd moleculargutcontentanalysisofdifferentspiderbodyparts