Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate–midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jung Min, Min, Geeho, Lee, Jae Min, Kim, Seung Han, Choi, Hyuk Soon, Kim, Eun Sun, Keum, Bora, Jeen, Yoon Tae, Chun, Hoon Jai, Lee, Hong Sik, Kim, Chang Duck, Park, Jong-Jae, Lee, Beom Jae, Choi, Seong Ji, Kim, Woojung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29768328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010635
_version_ 1783327153868242944
author Lee, Jung Min
Min, Geeho
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Kim, Eun Sun
Keum, Bora
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Hong Sik
Kim, Chang Duck
Park, Jong-Jae
Lee, Beom Jae
Choi, Seong Ji
Kim, Woojung
author_facet Lee, Jung Min
Min, Geeho
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Kim, Eun Sun
Keum, Bora
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Hong Sik
Kim, Chang Duck
Park, Jong-Jae
Lee, Beom Jae
Choi, Seong Ji
Kim, Woojung
author_sort Lee, Jung Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate–midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared to propofol–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients aged over 65 years who were scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol based on midazolam. The primary outcome was all cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were vital sign fluctuation (VSF), adverse events disturbing the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events was higher in the propofol group (72.6%) than in the etomidate group (54.8%) (P = .040). VSF was detected in 17 (27.4%) and 31 (50.0%) patients in the etomidate and propofol groups, respectively (P = .010). The incidence rate of adverse events disturbing the procedure was significantly higher in the etomidate group (25.8%) than in the propofol group (8.1%) (P = .008). Moreover, the incidence rate of myoclonus was significantly higher in the etomidate group (16.1%) than in the propofol group (1.6%) (P = .004). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups with respect to sedation times and sedation-related outcomes including patients’ and endoscopist's satisfaction. In the multivariate analysis, the etomidate group had significantly low odds ratio (OR) associated with VSF (OR: 0.407, confidence interval: 0.179–0.926, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using etomidate–midazolam in patients with high ASA score or vulnerable to risk factors; propofol–midazolam may be used as a guideline in patients with low ASA score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59763072018-06-05 Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Keum, Bora Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Kim, Chang Duck Park, Jong-Jae Lee, Beom Jae Choi, Seong Ji Kim, Woojung Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate–midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared to propofol–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients aged over 65 years who were scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol based on midazolam. The primary outcome was all cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were vital sign fluctuation (VSF), adverse events disturbing the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events was higher in the propofol group (72.6%) than in the etomidate group (54.8%) (P = .040). VSF was detected in 17 (27.4%) and 31 (50.0%) patients in the etomidate and propofol groups, respectively (P = .010). The incidence rate of adverse events disturbing the procedure was significantly higher in the etomidate group (25.8%) than in the propofol group (8.1%) (P = .008). Moreover, the incidence rate of myoclonus was significantly higher in the etomidate group (16.1%) than in the propofol group (1.6%) (P = .004). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups with respect to sedation times and sedation-related outcomes including patients’ and endoscopist's satisfaction. In the multivariate analysis, the etomidate group had significantly low odds ratio (OR) associated with VSF (OR: 0.407, confidence interval: 0.179–0.926, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using etomidate–midazolam in patients with high ASA score or vulnerable to risk factors; propofol–midazolam may be used as a guideline in patients with low ASA score. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5976307/ /pubmed/29768328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010635 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Jung Min
Min, Geeho
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Kim, Eun Sun
Keum, Bora
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Hong Sik
Kim, Chang Duck
Park, Jong-Jae
Lee, Beom Jae
Choi, Seong Ji
Kim, Woojung
Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
title Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
title_full Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
title_short Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
title_sort efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29768328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010635
work_keys_str_mv AT leejungmin efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT mingeeho efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT leejaemin efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimseunghan efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT choihyuksoon efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimeunsun efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT keumbora efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jeenyoontae efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chunhoonjai efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT leehongsik efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimchangduck efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT parkjongjae efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT leebeomjae efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT choiseongji efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimwoojung efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy