Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate–midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29768328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010635 |
_version_ | 1783327153868242944 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Keum, Bora Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Kim, Chang Duck Park, Jong-Jae Lee, Beom Jae Choi, Seong Ji Kim, Woojung |
author_facet | Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Keum, Bora Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Kim, Chang Duck Park, Jong-Jae Lee, Beom Jae Choi, Seong Ji Kim, Woojung |
author_sort | Lee, Jung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate–midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared to propofol–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients aged over 65 years who were scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol based on midazolam. The primary outcome was all cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were vital sign fluctuation (VSF), adverse events disturbing the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events was higher in the propofol group (72.6%) than in the etomidate group (54.8%) (P = .040). VSF was detected in 17 (27.4%) and 31 (50.0%) patients in the etomidate and propofol groups, respectively (P = .010). The incidence rate of adverse events disturbing the procedure was significantly higher in the etomidate group (25.8%) than in the propofol group (8.1%) (P = .008). Moreover, the incidence rate of myoclonus was significantly higher in the etomidate group (16.1%) than in the propofol group (1.6%) (P = .004). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups with respect to sedation times and sedation-related outcomes including patients’ and endoscopist's satisfaction. In the multivariate analysis, the etomidate group had significantly low odds ratio (OR) associated with VSF (OR: 0.407, confidence interval: 0.179–0.926, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using etomidate–midazolam in patients with high ASA score or vulnerable to risk factors; propofol–midazolam may be used as a guideline in patients with low ASA score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5976307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59763072018-06-05 Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Keum, Bora Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Kim, Chang Duck Park, Jong-Jae Lee, Beom Jae Choi, Seong Ji Kim, Woojung Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate–midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared to propofol–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients aged over 65 years who were scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol based on midazolam. The primary outcome was all cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were vital sign fluctuation (VSF), adverse events disturbing the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events was higher in the propofol group (72.6%) than in the etomidate group (54.8%) (P = .040). VSF was detected in 17 (27.4%) and 31 (50.0%) patients in the etomidate and propofol groups, respectively (P = .010). The incidence rate of adverse events disturbing the procedure was significantly higher in the etomidate group (25.8%) than in the propofol group (8.1%) (P = .008). Moreover, the incidence rate of myoclonus was significantly higher in the etomidate group (16.1%) than in the propofol group (1.6%) (P = .004). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups with respect to sedation times and sedation-related outcomes including patients’ and endoscopist's satisfaction. In the multivariate analysis, the etomidate group had significantly low odds ratio (OR) associated with VSF (OR: 0.407, confidence interval: 0.179–0.926, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using etomidate–midazolam in patients with high ASA score or vulnerable to risk factors; propofol–midazolam may be used as a guideline in patients with low ASA score. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5976307/ /pubmed/29768328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010635 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Keum, Bora Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Kim, Chang Duck Park, Jong-Jae Lee, Beom Jae Choi, Seong Ji Kim, Woojung Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
title | Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of etomidate–midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29768328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejungmin efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT mingeeho efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT leejaemin efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimseunghan efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT choihyuksoon efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimeunsun efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT keumbora efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT jeenyoontae efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT chunhoonjai efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT leehongsik efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimchangduck efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT parkjongjae efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT leebeomjae efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT choiseongji efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimwoojung efficacyandsafetyofetomidatemidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopyintheelderlyaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy |