Cargando…

Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends

Across species, cooperative alliances must withstand internal tensions. The mechanisms by which allies respond to competing against one another have been studied extensively in non-human animals, but much less so in humans. In non-human species, affiliative physical contact and close proximity immed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benenson, Joyce F., White, Maxwell M., Pandiani, Delfina Martinez, Hillyer, Lindsay J., Kantor, Sera, Markovits, Henry, Wrangham, Richard W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9
_version_ 1783327215913533440
author Benenson, Joyce F.
White, Maxwell M.
Pandiani, Delfina Martinez
Hillyer, Lindsay J.
Kantor, Sera
Markovits, Henry
Wrangham, Richard W.
author_facet Benenson, Joyce F.
White, Maxwell M.
Pandiani, Delfina Martinez
Hillyer, Lindsay J.
Kantor, Sera
Markovits, Henry
Wrangham, Richard W.
author_sort Benenson, Joyce F.
collection PubMed
description Across species, cooperative alliances must withstand internal tensions. The mechanisms by which allies respond to competing against one another have been studied extensively in non-human animals, but much less so in humans. In non-human species, affiliative physical contact and close proximity immediately following a contest are utilized to define reconciliation between opponents. The proportion of conflicts that are reconciled however differs markedly by species and sex. The purpose of this study was to examine whether, like many other social species, humans utilize physical contact and close proximity following a competition between friends, and if so, whether one sex is more likely to exhibit these behaviors. Using a standardized procedure, two same-gender friends competed against one another producing a clear winner and loser. Prior to and following the competition, the friends relaxed together. Videotapes of the relaxation periods showed that male friends spent more time than female friends engaged in affiliative physical contact and close proximity both before and after the competition, but not during a brief intervening cooperative task. These results suggest that in the face of competing self-interests, physical contact and close proximity facilitate repair of males’ more than females’ valuable relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59767142018-05-31 Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends Benenson, Joyce F. White, Maxwell M. Pandiani, Delfina Martinez Hillyer, Lindsay J. Kantor, Sera Markovits, Henry Wrangham, Richard W. Sci Rep Article Across species, cooperative alliances must withstand internal tensions. The mechanisms by which allies respond to competing against one another have been studied extensively in non-human animals, but much less so in humans. In non-human species, affiliative physical contact and close proximity immediately following a contest are utilized to define reconciliation between opponents. The proportion of conflicts that are reconciled however differs markedly by species and sex. The purpose of this study was to examine whether, like many other social species, humans utilize physical contact and close proximity following a competition between friends, and if so, whether one sex is more likely to exhibit these behaviors. Using a standardized procedure, two same-gender friends competed against one another producing a clear winner and loser. Prior to and following the competition, the friends relaxed together. Videotapes of the relaxation periods showed that male friends spent more time than female friends engaged in affiliative physical contact and close proximity both before and after the competition, but not during a brief intervening cooperative task. These results suggest that in the face of competing self-interests, physical contact and close proximity facilitate repair of males’ more than females’ valuable relationships. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5976714/ /pubmed/29849135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Benenson, Joyce F.
White, Maxwell M.
Pandiani, Delfina Martinez
Hillyer, Lindsay J.
Kantor, Sera
Markovits, Henry
Wrangham, Richard W.
Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
title Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
title_full Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
title_fullStr Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
title_full_unstemmed Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
title_short Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
title_sort competition elicits more physical affiliation between male than female friends
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9
work_keys_str_mv AT benensonjoycef competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends
AT whitemaxwellm competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends
AT pandianidelfinamartinez competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends
AT hillyerlindsayj competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends
AT kantorsera competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends
AT markovitshenry competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends
AT wranghamrichardw competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends