Cargando…
Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
Across species, cooperative alliances must withstand internal tensions. The mechanisms by which allies respond to competing against one another have been studied extensively in non-human animals, but much less so in humans. In non-human species, affiliative physical contact and close proximity immed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9 |
_version_ | 1783327215913533440 |
---|---|
author | Benenson, Joyce F. White, Maxwell M. Pandiani, Delfina Martinez Hillyer, Lindsay J. Kantor, Sera Markovits, Henry Wrangham, Richard W. |
author_facet | Benenson, Joyce F. White, Maxwell M. Pandiani, Delfina Martinez Hillyer, Lindsay J. Kantor, Sera Markovits, Henry Wrangham, Richard W. |
author_sort | Benenson, Joyce F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Across species, cooperative alliances must withstand internal tensions. The mechanisms by which allies respond to competing against one another have been studied extensively in non-human animals, but much less so in humans. In non-human species, affiliative physical contact and close proximity immediately following a contest are utilized to define reconciliation between opponents. The proportion of conflicts that are reconciled however differs markedly by species and sex. The purpose of this study was to examine whether, like many other social species, humans utilize physical contact and close proximity following a competition between friends, and if so, whether one sex is more likely to exhibit these behaviors. Using a standardized procedure, two same-gender friends competed against one another producing a clear winner and loser. Prior to and following the competition, the friends relaxed together. Videotapes of the relaxation periods showed that male friends spent more time than female friends engaged in affiliative physical contact and close proximity both before and after the competition, but not during a brief intervening cooperative task. These results suggest that in the face of competing self-interests, physical contact and close proximity facilitate repair of males’ more than females’ valuable relationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5976714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59767142018-05-31 Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends Benenson, Joyce F. White, Maxwell M. Pandiani, Delfina Martinez Hillyer, Lindsay J. Kantor, Sera Markovits, Henry Wrangham, Richard W. Sci Rep Article Across species, cooperative alliances must withstand internal tensions. The mechanisms by which allies respond to competing against one another have been studied extensively in non-human animals, but much less so in humans. In non-human species, affiliative physical contact and close proximity immediately following a contest are utilized to define reconciliation between opponents. The proportion of conflicts that are reconciled however differs markedly by species and sex. The purpose of this study was to examine whether, like many other social species, humans utilize physical contact and close proximity following a competition between friends, and if so, whether one sex is more likely to exhibit these behaviors. Using a standardized procedure, two same-gender friends competed against one another producing a clear winner and loser. Prior to and following the competition, the friends relaxed together. Videotapes of the relaxation periods showed that male friends spent more time than female friends engaged in affiliative physical contact and close proximity both before and after the competition, but not during a brief intervening cooperative task. These results suggest that in the face of competing self-interests, physical contact and close proximity facilitate repair of males’ more than females’ valuable relationships. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5976714/ /pubmed/29849135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Benenson, Joyce F. White, Maxwell M. Pandiani, Delfina Martinez Hillyer, Lindsay J. Kantor, Sera Markovits, Henry Wrangham, Richard W. Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends |
title | Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends |
title_full | Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends |
title_fullStr | Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends |
title_full_unstemmed | Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends |
title_short | Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends |
title_sort | competition elicits more physical affiliation between male than female friends |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benensonjoycef competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends AT whitemaxwellm competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends AT pandianidelfinamartinez competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends AT hillyerlindsayj competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends AT kantorsera competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends AT markovitshenry competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends AT wranghamrichardw competitionelicitsmorephysicalaffiliationbetweenmalethanfemalefriends |