Cargando…

Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia

The relationship between happiness and income has been at the center of a vibrant debate, with both intrinsic and instrumental importance, as emotional states are an important determinant of health and social behavior. We investigate whether a government-run unconditional cash transfer paid directly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natali, Luisa, Handa, Sudhanshu, Peterman, Amber, Seidenfeld, David, Tembo, Gelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.002
_version_ 1783327242835722240
author Natali, Luisa
Handa, Sudhanshu
Peterman, Amber
Seidenfeld, David
Tembo, Gelson
author_facet Natali, Luisa
Handa, Sudhanshu
Peterman, Amber
Seidenfeld, David
Tembo, Gelson
author_sort Natali, Luisa
collection PubMed
description The relationship between happiness and income has been at the center of a vibrant debate, with both intrinsic and instrumental importance, as emotional states are an important determinant of health and social behavior. We investigate whether a government-run unconditional cash transfer paid directly to women in poor households had an impact on self-reported happiness. The evaluation was designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Zambia across 90 communities. The program led to a 7.5 to 10 percentage point impact on women’s happiness after 36- and 48-months, respectively (or 0.19–0.25 standard deviations over the control group mean). In addition, women have higher overall satisfaction regarding their young children’s well-being, including indicators of satisfaction with their children’s health and positive outlook on their children’s future. Complementary analysis suggests that self-assessed relative poverty (as measured by comparison to other households in the community) is a more important mediator of program effects on happiness than absolute poverty (as measured by household consumption expenditures). Although typically not the focus of such evaluations, impacts on psychosocial indicators, including happiness, should not be discounted as important outcomes, as they capture different, non-material, holistic aspects of an individual’s overall level of well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59768282018-05-31 Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia Natali, Luisa Handa, Sudhanshu Peterman, Amber Seidenfeld, David Tembo, Gelson SSM Popul Health Article The relationship between happiness and income has been at the center of a vibrant debate, with both intrinsic and instrumental importance, as emotional states are an important determinant of health and social behavior. We investigate whether a government-run unconditional cash transfer paid directly to women in poor households had an impact on self-reported happiness. The evaluation was designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Zambia across 90 communities. The program led to a 7.5 to 10 percentage point impact on women’s happiness after 36- and 48-months, respectively (or 0.19–0.25 standard deviations over the control group mean). In addition, women have higher overall satisfaction regarding their young children’s well-being, including indicators of satisfaction with their children’s health and positive outlook on their children’s future. Complementary analysis suggests that self-assessed relative poverty (as measured by comparison to other households in the community) is a more important mediator of program effects on happiness than absolute poverty (as measured by household consumption expenditures). Although typically not the focus of such evaluations, impacts on psychosocial indicators, including happiness, should not be discounted as important outcomes, as they capture different, non-material, holistic aspects of an individual’s overall level of well-being. Elsevier 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5976828/ /pubmed/29854906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.002 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Natali, Luisa
Handa, Sudhanshu
Peterman, Amber
Seidenfeld, David
Tembo, Gelson
Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
title Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
title_full Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
title_fullStr Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
title_full_unstemmed Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
title_short Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
title_sort does money buy happiness? evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in zambia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliluisa doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia
AT handasudhanshu doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia
AT petermanamber doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia
AT seidenfelddavid doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia
AT tembogelson doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia
AT doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia