Cargando…
Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia
The relationship between happiness and income has been at the center of a vibrant debate, with both intrinsic and instrumental importance, as emotional states are an important determinant of health and social behavior. We investigate whether a government-run unconditional cash transfer paid directly...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.002 |
_version_ | 1783327242835722240 |
---|---|
author | Natali, Luisa Handa, Sudhanshu Peterman, Amber Seidenfeld, David Tembo, Gelson |
author_facet | Natali, Luisa Handa, Sudhanshu Peterman, Amber Seidenfeld, David Tembo, Gelson |
author_sort | Natali, Luisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relationship between happiness and income has been at the center of a vibrant debate, with both intrinsic and instrumental importance, as emotional states are an important determinant of health and social behavior. We investigate whether a government-run unconditional cash transfer paid directly to women in poor households had an impact on self-reported happiness. The evaluation was designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Zambia across 90 communities. The program led to a 7.5 to 10 percentage point impact on women’s happiness after 36- and 48-months, respectively (or 0.19–0.25 standard deviations over the control group mean). In addition, women have higher overall satisfaction regarding their young children’s well-being, including indicators of satisfaction with their children’s health and positive outlook on their children’s future. Complementary analysis suggests that self-assessed relative poverty (as measured by comparison to other households in the community) is a more important mediator of program effects on happiness than absolute poverty (as measured by household consumption expenditures). Although typically not the focus of such evaluations, impacts on psychosocial indicators, including happiness, should not be discounted as important outcomes, as they capture different, non-material, holistic aspects of an individual’s overall level of well-being. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5976828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59768282018-05-31 Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia Natali, Luisa Handa, Sudhanshu Peterman, Amber Seidenfeld, David Tembo, Gelson SSM Popul Health Article The relationship between happiness and income has been at the center of a vibrant debate, with both intrinsic and instrumental importance, as emotional states are an important determinant of health and social behavior. We investigate whether a government-run unconditional cash transfer paid directly to women in poor households had an impact on self-reported happiness. The evaluation was designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Zambia across 90 communities. The program led to a 7.5 to 10 percentage point impact on women’s happiness after 36- and 48-months, respectively (or 0.19–0.25 standard deviations over the control group mean). In addition, women have higher overall satisfaction regarding their young children’s well-being, including indicators of satisfaction with their children’s health and positive outlook on their children’s future. Complementary analysis suggests that self-assessed relative poverty (as measured by comparison to other households in the community) is a more important mediator of program effects on happiness than absolute poverty (as measured by household consumption expenditures). Although typically not the focus of such evaluations, impacts on psychosocial indicators, including happiness, should not be discounted as important outcomes, as they capture different, non-material, holistic aspects of an individual’s overall level of well-being. Elsevier 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5976828/ /pubmed/29854906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.002 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Natali, Luisa Handa, Sudhanshu Peterman, Amber Seidenfeld, David Tembo, Gelson Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia |
title | Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia |
title_full | Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia |
title_fullStr | Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia |
title_full_unstemmed | Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia |
title_short | Does money buy happiness? Evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in Zambia |
title_sort | does money buy happiness? evidence from an unconditional cash transfer in zambia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nataliluisa doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia AT handasudhanshu doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia AT petermanamber doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia AT seidenfelddavid doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia AT tembogelson doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia AT doesmoneybuyhappinessevidencefromanunconditionalcashtransferinzambia |