Cargando…

Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat

Hyperspectral remote sensing is a rapid non-destructive method for diagnosing nitrogen status in wheat crops. In this study, a quantitative correlation was associated with following parameters: leaf nitrogen accumulation (LNA), raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Changwei, Du, Ying, Zhou, Jian, Wang, Dunliang, Luo, Ming, Zhang, Yongjian, Guo, Wenshan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00674
_version_ 1783327243747983360
author Tan, Changwei
Du, Ying
Zhou, Jian
Wang, Dunliang
Luo, Ming
Zhang, Yongjian
Guo, Wenshan
author_facet Tan, Changwei
Du, Ying
Zhou, Jian
Wang, Dunliang
Luo, Ming
Zhang, Yongjian
Guo, Wenshan
author_sort Tan, Changwei
collection PubMed
description Hyperspectral remote sensing is a rapid non-destructive method for diagnosing nitrogen status in wheat crops. In this study, a quantitative correlation was associated with following parameters: leaf nitrogen accumulation (LNA), raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, and hyperspectral characteristics of wheat. In this study, integrated linear regression of LNA was obtained with raw hyperspectral reflectance (measurement wavelength = 790.4 nm). Furthermore, an exponential regression of LNA was obtained with first-order differential hyperspectra (measurement wavelength = 831.7 nm). Coefficients (R(2)) were 0.813 and 0.847; root mean squared errors (RMSE) were 2.02 g·m(−2) and 1.72 g·m(−2); and relative errors (RE) were 25.97% and 20.85%, respectively. Both the techniques were considered as optimal in the diagnoses of wheat LNA. Nevertheless, the better one was the new normalized variable (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)), which was based on vegetation indices of R(2) = 0.935, RMSE = 0.98, and RE = 11.25%. In addition, (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)) was reliable in the application of a different cultivar or even wheat grown elsewhere. This indicated a superior fit and better performance for (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)). For diagnosing LNA in wheat, the newly normalized variable (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)) was more effective than the previously reported data of raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, and red-edge parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59768342018-06-07 Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat Tan, Changwei Du, Ying Zhou, Jian Wang, Dunliang Luo, Ming Zhang, Yongjian Guo, Wenshan Front Plant Sci Plant Science Hyperspectral remote sensing is a rapid non-destructive method for diagnosing nitrogen status in wheat crops. In this study, a quantitative correlation was associated with following parameters: leaf nitrogen accumulation (LNA), raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, and hyperspectral characteristics of wheat. In this study, integrated linear regression of LNA was obtained with raw hyperspectral reflectance (measurement wavelength = 790.4 nm). Furthermore, an exponential regression of LNA was obtained with first-order differential hyperspectra (measurement wavelength = 831.7 nm). Coefficients (R(2)) were 0.813 and 0.847; root mean squared errors (RMSE) were 2.02 g·m(−2) and 1.72 g·m(−2); and relative errors (RE) were 25.97% and 20.85%, respectively. Both the techniques were considered as optimal in the diagnoses of wheat LNA. Nevertheless, the better one was the new normalized variable (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)), which was based on vegetation indices of R(2) = 0.935, RMSE = 0.98, and RE = 11.25%. In addition, (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)) was reliable in the application of a different cultivar or even wheat grown elsewhere. This indicated a superior fit and better performance for (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)). For diagnosing LNA in wheat, the newly normalized variable (SD(r) − SD(b))/(SD(r) + SD(b)) was more effective than the previously reported data of raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, and red-edge parameters. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5976834/ /pubmed/29881393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00674 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tan, Du, Zhou, Wang, Luo, Zhang and Guo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Tan, Changwei
Du, Ying
Zhou, Jian
Wang, Dunliang
Luo, Ming
Zhang, Yongjian
Guo, Wenshan
Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
title Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
title_full Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
title_fullStr Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
title_short Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
title_sort analysis of different hyperspectral variables for diagnosing leaf nitrogen accumulation in wheat
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00674
work_keys_str_mv AT tanchangwei analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat
AT duying analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat
AT zhoujian analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat
AT wangdunliang analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat
AT luoming analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat
AT zhangyongjian analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat
AT guowenshan analysisofdifferenthyperspectralvariablesfordiagnosingleafnitrogenaccumulationinwheat