Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

INTRODUCTION: This study is aimed at evaluating root canal transportation in the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molars prepared with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One nickel titanium (NiTi) single-file rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ex v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saberi, Eshaghali, Farhad-Mollashahi, Narges, Bijari, Shima, Daryaeian, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4151692
_version_ 1783327273397518336
author Saberi, Eshaghali
Farhad-Mollashahi, Narges
Bijari, Shima
Daryaeian, Mohammad
author_facet Saberi, Eshaghali
Farhad-Mollashahi, Narges
Bijari, Shima
Daryaeian, Mohammad
author_sort Saberi, Eshaghali
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study is aimed at evaluating root canal transportation in the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molars prepared with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One nickel titanium (NiTi) single-file rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ex vivo study, CBCT scans of 45 extracted human mandibular first molars with 20–40° curvature were obtained. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=15) for preparation of the mesiobuccal canal with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One rotary systems according to the manufacturers' instructions. CBCT scans were obtained again after canal preparation. Changes caused by preparation in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds were determined on CBCT scans and analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test at P ≤ 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in the amount of canal transportation among the three groups (P > 0.05). M-One caused greater transportation in the apical third compared with Reciproc and One Shape, and One Shape caused greater transportation in the coronal third compared with other groups, although its magnitude was less than 0.3 mm. CONCLUSION: Reciproc, One Shape, and M-One are not significantly different in terms of canal transportation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59769672018-06-03 Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study Saberi, Eshaghali Farhad-Mollashahi, Narges Bijari, Shima Daryaeian, Mohammad Int J Dent Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study is aimed at evaluating root canal transportation in the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molars prepared with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One nickel titanium (NiTi) single-file rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ex vivo study, CBCT scans of 45 extracted human mandibular first molars with 20–40° curvature were obtained. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=15) for preparation of the mesiobuccal canal with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One rotary systems according to the manufacturers' instructions. CBCT scans were obtained again after canal preparation. Changes caused by preparation in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds were determined on CBCT scans and analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test at P ≤ 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in the amount of canal transportation among the three groups (P > 0.05). M-One caused greater transportation in the apical third compared with Reciproc and One Shape, and One Shape caused greater transportation in the coronal third compared with other groups, although its magnitude was less than 0.3 mm. CONCLUSION: Reciproc, One Shape, and M-One are not significantly different in terms of canal transportation. Hindawi 2018-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5976967/ /pubmed/29861728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4151692 Text en Copyright © 2018 Eshaghali Saberi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saberi, Eshaghali
Farhad-Mollashahi, Narges
Bijari, Shima
Daryaeian, Mohammad
Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of root canal transportation by three niti single-file systems in curved canals: a cone beam computed tomography study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4151692
work_keys_str_mv AT saberieshaghali comparativeevaluationofrootcanaltransportationbythreenitisinglefilesystemsincurvedcanalsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT farhadmollashahinarges comparativeevaluationofrootcanaltransportationbythreenitisinglefilesystemsincurvedcanalsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT bijarishima comparativeevaluationofrootcanaltransportationbythreenitisinglefilesystemsincurvedcanalsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT daryaeianmohammad comparativeevaluationofrootcanaltransportationbythreenitisinglefilesystemsincurvedcanalsaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy