Cargando…

Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding

Feed incurs most of the cost of aquaculture production, so feed efficiency (FE) improvement is of great importance. Our aim is to use work done in pigs to formulate a logical framework for assessing the most useful component traits influencing feed intake (FI) and efficiency in farmed fish – either...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knap, Pieter W., Kause, Antti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00184
_version_ 1783327280986062848
author Knap, Pieter W.
Kause, Antti
author_facet Knap, Pieter W.
Kause, Antti
author_sort Knap, Pieter W.
collection PubMed
description Feed incurs most of the cost of aquaculture production, so feed efficiency (FE) improvement is of great importance. Our aim is to use work done in pigs to formulate a logical framework for assessing the most useful component traits influencing feed intake (FI) and efficiency in farmed fish – either to identify traits that can together be used for genetic improvement of FE, or as substitute traits for FI recording. Improvement of gross FE in growing fish can be accomplished by selection for increased growth rate. However, the correlation of growth with FE is typically only modest, and hence there is room for further improvement of FE through methods other than growth selection. Based on a literature review we propose that the most effective additional methods are selection for reduced body lipid content and for reduced residual FI (RFI). Both methods require more or less sophisticated recording equipment; in particular, the estimation of RFI requires recording of FI which is a challenge. In mammals and birds, both these approaches have been effective, and despite the high costs of FI recording, the RFI approach can be cost-efficient because maintenance requirements are high and therefore RFI variation covers a large part of FI variance. Maintenance requirements of fish are lower and therefore RFI variation covers a smaller part of FI variance. Moreover, accurate high-volume routine individual FI recording is much more challenging in fish than in mammals or birds. It follows that selection for reduced body fat content is likely a more effective (and certainly more cost-efficient) way to improve feed conversion ratio in fish than selection for reduced RFI. As long as body fat content is dealt with as an explicit selection criterion, the only valid reason for FI recording would be the requirement of RFI reduction. So, if RFI reduction is not required, there would be no need for the expense and effort of individual FI recording – and in fish breeding that would be a very desirable situation. Solid evidence for these propositions is still scarce, and their generality still needs to be confirmed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5976999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59769992018-06-07 Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding Knap, Pieter W. Kause, Antti Front Genet Genetics Feed incurs most of the cost of aquaculture production, so feed efficiency (FE) improvement is of great importance. Our aim is to use work done in pigs to formulate a logical framework for assessing the most useful component traits influencing feed intake (FI) and efficiency in farmed fish – either to identify traits that can together be used for genetic improvement of FE, or as substitute traits for FI recording. Improvement of gross FE in growing fish can be accomplished by selection for increased growth rate. However, the correlation of growth with FE is typically only modest, and hence there is room for further improvement of FE through methods other than growth selection. Based on a literature review we propose that the most effective additional methods are selection for reduced body lipid content and for reduced residual FI (RFI). Both methods require more or less sophisticated recording equipment; in particular, the estimation of RFI requires recording of FI which is a challenge. In mammals and birds, both these approaches have been effective, and despite the high costs of FI recording, the RFI approach can be cost-efficient because maintenance requirements are high and therefore RFI variation covers a large part of FI variance. Maintenance requirements of fish are lower and therefore RFI variation covers a smaller part of FI variance. Moreover, accurate high-volume routine individual FI recording is much more challenging in fish than in mammals or birds. It follows that selection for reduced body fat content is likely a more effective (and certainly more cost-efficient) way to improve feed conversion ratio in fish than selection for reduced RFI. As long as body fat content is dealt with as an explicit selection criterion, the only valid reason for FI recording would be the requirement of RFI reduction. So, if RFI reduction is not required, there would be no need for the expense and effort of individual FI recording – and in fish breeding that would be a very desirable situation. Solid evidence for these propositions is still scarce, and their generality still needs to be confirmed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5976999/ /pubmed/29881397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00184 Text en Copyright © 2018 Knap and Kause. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Knap, Pieter W.
Kause, Antti
Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding
title Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding
title_full Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding
title_fullStr Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding
title_full_unstemmed Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding
title_short Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding
title_sort phenotyping for genetic improvement of feed efficiency in fish: lessons from pig breeding
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5976999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00184
work_keys_str_mv AT knappieterw phenotypingforgeneticimprovementoffeedefficiencyinfishlessonsfrompigbreeding
AT kauseantti phenotypingforgeneticimprovementoffeedefficiencyinfishlessonsfrompigbreeding