Cargando…

Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting

Monozygotic (MZ) twins are typically indistinguishable via forensic DNA profiling. Recently, we demonstrated that epigenetic differentiation of MZ twins is feasible; however, proportions of twin differentially methylated CpG sites (tDMSs) identified in reference-type blood DNA were not replicated in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidaki, Athina, Kalamara, Vivian, Carnero-Montoro, Elena, Spector, Timothy D., Bell, Jordana T., Kayser, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29758014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9050252
_version_ 1783327326218485760
author Vidaki, Athina
Kalamara, Vivian
Carnero-Montoro, Elena
Spector, Timothy D.
Bell, Jordana T.
Kayser, Manfred
author_facet Vidaki, Athina
Kalamara, Vivian
Carnero-Montoro, Elena
Spector, Timothy D.
Bell, Jordana T.
Kayser, Manfred
author_sort Vidaki, Athina
collection PubMed
description Monozygotic (MZ) twins are typically indistinguishable via forensic DNA profiling. Recently, we demonstrated that epigenetic differentiation of MZ twins is feasible; however, proportions of twin differentially methylated CpG sites (tDMSs) identified in reference-type blood DNA were not replicated in trace-type blood DNA. Here we investigated buccal swabs as typical forensic reference material, and saliva and cigarette butts as commonly encountered forensic trace materials. As an analog to a forensic case, we analyzed one MZ twin pair. Epigenome-wide microarray analysis in reference-type buccal DNA revealed 25 candidate tDMSs with >0.5 twin-to-twin differences. MethyLight quantitative PCR (qPCR) of 22 selected tDMSs in trace-type DNA revealed in saliva DNA that six tDMSs (27.3%) had >0.1 twin-to-twin differences, seven (31.8%) had smaller (<0.1) but robustly detected differences, whereas for nine (40.9%) the differences were in the opposite direction relative to the microarray data; for cigarette butt DNA, results were 50%, 22.7%, and 27.3%, respectively. The discrepancies between reference-type and trace-type DNA outcomes can be explained by cell composition differences, method-to-method variation, and other technical reasons including bisulfite conversion inefficiency. Our study highlights the importance of the DNA source and that careful characterization of biological and technical effects is needed before epigenetic MZ twin differentiation is applicable in forensic casework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5977192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59771922018-05-31 Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting Vidaki, Athina Kalamara, Vivian Carnero-Montoro, Elena Spector, Timothy D. Bell, Jordana T. Kayser, Manfred Genes (Basel) Article Monozygotic (MZ) twins are typically indistinguishable via forensic DNA profiling. Recently, we demonstrated that epigenetic differentiation of MZ twins is feasible; however, proportions of twin differentially methylated CpG sites (tDMSs) identified in reference-type blood DNA were not replicated in trace-type blood DNA. Here we investigated buccal swabs as typical forensic reference material, and saliva and cigarette butts as commonly encountered forensic trace materials. As an analog to a forensic case, we analyzed one MZ twin pair. Epigenome-wide microarray analysis in reference-type buccal DNA revealed 25 candidate tDMSs with >0.5 twin-to-twin differences. MethyLight quantitative PCR (qPCR) of 22 selected tDMSs in trace-type DNA revealed in saliva DNA that six tDMSs (27.3%) had >0.1 twin-to-twin differences, seven (31.8%) had smaller (<0.1) but robustly detected differences, whereas for nine (40.9%) the differences were in the opposite direction relative to the microarray data; for cigarette butt DNA, results were 50%, 22.7%, and 27.3%, respectively. The discrepancies between reference-type and trace-type DNA outcomes can be explained by cell composition differences, method-to-method variation, and other technical reasons including bisulfite conversion inefficiency. Our study highlights the importance of the DNA source and that careful characterization of biological and technical effects is needed before epigenetic MZ twin differentiation is applicable in forensic casework. MDPI 2018-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5977192/ /pubmed/29758014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9050252 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vidaki, Athina
Kalamara, Vivian
Carnero-Montoro, Elena
Spector, Timothy D.
Bell, Jordana T.
Kayser, Manfred
Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting
title Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting
title_full Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting
title_fullStr Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting
title_short Investigating the Epigenetic Discrimination of Identical Twins Using Buccal Swabs, Saliva, and Cigarette Butts in the Forensic Setting
title_sort investigating the epigenetic discrimination of identical twins using buccal swabs, saliva, and cigarette butts in the forensic setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29758014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9050252
work_keys_str_mv AT vidakiathina investigatingtheepigeneticdiscriminationofidenticaltwinsusingbuccalswabssalivaandcigarettebuttsintheforensicsetting
AT kalamaravivian investigatingtheepigeneticdiscriminationofidenticaltwinsusingbuccalswabssalivaandcigarettebuttsintheforensicsetting
AT carneromontoroelena investigatingtheepigeneticdiscriminationofidenticaltwinsusingbuccalswabssalivaandcigarettebuttsintheforensicsetting
AT spectortimothyd investigatingtheepigeneticdiscriminationofidenticaltwinsusingbuccalswabssalivaandcigarettebuttsintheforensicsetting
AT belljordanat investigatingtheepigeneticdiscriminationofidenticaltwinsusingbuccalswabssalivaandcigarettebuttsintheforensicsetting
AT kaysermanfred investigatingtheepigeneticdiscriminationofidenticaltwinsusingbuccalswabssalivaandcigarettebuttsintheforensicsetting