Cargando…

Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE: Restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies remain controversial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic benefits of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We identified r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Qi-Hong, Wang, Hua-Ling, Liu, Lei, Shao, Jun, Yu, Jiangqian, Zheng, Rui-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29848364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2062-5
_version_ 1783327381433352192
author Chen, Qi-Hong
Wang, Hua-Ling
Liu, Lei
Shao, Jun
Yu, Jiangqian
Zheng, Rui-Qiang
author_facet Chen, Qi-Hong
Wang, Hua-Ling
Liu, Lei
Shao, Jun
Yu, Jiangqian
Zheng, Rui-Qiang
author_sort Chen, Qi-Hong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies remain controversial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic benefits of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We identified randomized clinical trials through the 9th of December 2017 that investigated a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy versus a liberal transfusion strategy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Individual patient data from each study were collected. Meta-analyses were performed for the primary and secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. A trial sequential analysis (TSA)-adjusted random-effects model was used to pool the results from the included studies for the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven trials involving a total of 8886 patients were included. The TSA evaluations suggested that this meta-analysis could draw firm negative results, and the data were sufficient. There was no evidence that the risk of 30-day mortality differed between the patients assigned to a restrictive blood cell transfusion strategy and a liberal transfusion strategy (odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.24; p = 0.87). Furthermore, the study suggested that the restrictive transfusion strategy was not associated with significant increases in pulmonary morbidity (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.34; p = 0.44), postoperative infection (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.3; p = 0.58), acute kidney injury (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14; p = 0.71), acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.27; p = 0.78), or cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.30; p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy was not inferior to the liberal strategy with respect to 30-day mortality, pulmonary morbidity, postoperative infection, cerebrovascular accidents, acute kidney injury, or acute myocardial infarction, and fewer red blood cells were transfused. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2062-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5977455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59774552018-05-31 Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Chen, Qi-Hong Wang, Hua-Ling Liu, Lei Shao, Jun Yu, Jiangqian Zheng, Rui-Qiang Crit Care Review PURPOSE: Restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies remain controversial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic benefits of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We identified randomized clinical trials through the 9th of December 2017 that investigated a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy versus a liberal transfusion strategy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Individual patient data from each study were collected. Meta-analyses were performed for the primary and secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. A trial sequential analysis (TSA)-adjusted random-effects model was used to pool the results from the included studies for the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven trials involving a total of 8886 patients were included. The TSA evaluations suggested that this meta-analysis could draw firm negative results, and the data were sufficient. There was no evidence that the risk of 30-day mortality differed between the patients assigned to a restrictive blood cell transfusion strategy and a liberal transfusion strategy (odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.24; p = 0.87). Furthermore, the study suggested that the restrictive transfusion strategy was not associated with significant increases in pulmonary morbidity (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.34; p = 0.44), postoperative infection (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.3; p = 0.58), acute kidney injury (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14; p = 0.71), acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.27; p = 0.78), or cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.30; p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy was not inferior to the liberal strategy with respect to 30-day mortality, pulmonary morbidity, postoperative infection, cerebrovascular accidents, acute kidney injury, or acute myocardial infarction, and fewer red blood cells were transfused. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2062-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5977455/ /pubmed/29848364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2062-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Qi-Hong
Wang, Hua-Ling
Liu, Lei
Shao, Jun
Yu, Jiangqian
Zheng, Rui-Qiang
Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29848364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2062-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chenqihong effectsofrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusionontheprognosesofadultpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wanghualing effectsofrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusionontheprognosesofadultpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liulei effectsofrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusionontheprognosesofadultpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shaojun effectsofrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusionontheprognosesofadultpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yujiangqian effectsofrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusionontheprognosesofadultpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhengruiqiang effectsofrestrictiveredbloodcelltransfusionontheprognosesofadultpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials