Cargando…

The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016

BACKGROUND: A high level of antibiotic consumption in France means antimicrobial resistance requires rigorous monitoring. The Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.) is a global surveillance study that monitors the in vitro activities of tigecycline and a panel of marketed antimicro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decousser, Jean-Winoc, Woerther, Paul-Louis, Soussy, Claude-James, Fines-Guyon, Marguerite, Dowzicky, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0360-y
_version_ 1783327400371683328
author Decousser, Jean-Winoc
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Soussy, Claude-James
Fines-Guyon, Marguerite
Dowzicky, Michael J.
author_facet Decousser, Jean-Winoc
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Soussy, Claude-James
Fines-Guyon, Marguerite
Dowzicky, Michael J.
author_sort Decousser, Jean-Winoc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A high level of antibiotic consumption in France means antimicrobial resistance requires rigorous monitoring. The Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.) is a global surveillance study that monitors the in vitro activities of tigecycline and a panel of marketed antimicrobials against clinically important Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. METHODS: Annually clinically relevant strains were prospectively included in the survey through a national network of hospital-based laboratories. MICs were determined locally by broth microdilution using CLSI guidelines. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-three centres in France collected 26,486 isolates between 2004 and 2016. Enterococcus species were highly susceptible (≥94.4%) to linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin. Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), were susceptible (≥99.9%) to tigecycline, vancomycin and linezolid. Between 2004 and 2016, 27.7% of S. aureus isolates were MRSA, decreasing from 28.0% in 2013 to 23.5% in 2016. Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates was 100% to vancomycin, and > 99.0% to levofloxacin, linezolid and meropenem; 3.0% were penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (100% susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid). Escherichia coli isolates were highly susceptible (> 98.0%) to meropenem, tigecycline and amikacin. The rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive E. coli increased from 2004 (3.0%), but was stable from 2012 (23.1%) to 2016 (19.8%). Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates was 99.4% to meropenem and 96.5% to amikacin. The proportion of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae isolates increased from 2004 (7.5%) to 2012 (33.3%) and was highest in 2016 (43.6%). A. baumannii was susceptible to meropenem (81.0%) and amikacin (74.9%); none of the 6.2% of isolates identified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) was susceptible to any agents with breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates were most susceptible to amikacin (88.5%), and MDR rates were 13.6% in 2013 to 4.0% in 2016; susceptibility of MDR isolates was no higher than 31.4% to amikacin. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MRSA decreased slowly, while rates of ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae increased from 2004 to 2016. Susceptibility of Gram-positive isolates to vancomycin, tigecycline, meropenem and linezolid was well conserved, as was susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates to tigecycline and meropenem. The spread of MDR non-fermentative isolates must be carefully monitored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5977734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59777342018-06-06 The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016 Decousser, Jean-Winoc Woerther, Paul-Louis Soussy, Claude-James Fines-Guyon, Marguerite Dowzicky, Michael J. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: A high level of antibiotic consumption in France means antimicrobial resistance requires rigorous monitoring. The Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.) is a global surveillance study that monitors the in vitro activities of tigecycline and a panel of marketed antimicrobials against clinically important Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. METHODS: Annually clinically relevant strains were prospectively included in the survey through a national network of hospital-based laboratories. MICs were determined locally by broth microdilution using CLSI guidelines. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-three centres in France collected 26,486 isolates between 2004 and 2016. Enterococcus species were highly susceptible (≥94.4%) to linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin. Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), were susceptible (≥99.9%) to tigecycline, vancomycin and linezolid. Between 2004 and 2016, 27.7% of S. aureus isolates were MRSA, decreasing from 28.0% in 2013 to 23.5% in 2016. Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates was 100% to vancomycin, and > 99.0% to levofloxacin, linezolid and meropenem; 3.0% were penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (100% susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid). Escherichia coli isolates were highly susceptible (> 98.0%) to meropenem, tigecycline and amikacin. The rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive E. coli increased from 2004 (3.0%), but was stable from 2012 (23.1%) to 2016 (19.8%). Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates was 99.4% to meropenem and 96.5% to amikacin. The proportion of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae isolates increased from 2004 (7.5%) to 2012 (33.3%) and was highest in 2016 (43.6%). A. baumannii was susceptible to meropenem (81.0%) and amikacin (74.9%); none of the 6.2% of isolates identified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) was susceptible to any agents with breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates were most susceptible to amikacin (88.5%), and MDR rates were 13.6% in 2013 to 4.0% in 2016; susceptibility of MDR isolates was no higher than 31.4% to amikacin. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MRSA decreased slowly, while rates of ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae increased from 2004 to 2016. Susceptibility of Gram-positive isolates to vancomycin, tigecycline, meropenem and linezolid was well conserved, as was susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates to tigecycline and meropenem. The spread of MDR non-fermentative isolates must be carefully monitored. BioMed Central 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5977734/ /pubmed/29876099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0360-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Decousser, Jean-Winoc
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Soussy, Claude-James
Fines-Guyon, Marguerite
Dowzicky, Michael J.
The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016
title The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016
title_full The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016
title_fullStr The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016
title_full_unstemmed The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016
title_short The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016
title_sort tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from france collected between 2004 and 2016
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0360-y
work_keys_str_mv AT decousserjeanwinoc thetigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT woertherpaullouis thetigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT soussyclaudejames thetigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT finesguyonmarguerite thetigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT dowzickymichaelj thetigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT decousserjeanwinoc tigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT woertherpaullouis tigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT soussyclaudejames tigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT finesguyonmarguerite tigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016
AT dowzickymichaelj tigecyclineevaluationandsurveillancetrialassessmentoftheactivityoftigecyclineandotherselectedantibioticsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativepathogensfromfrancecollectedbetween2004and2016