Cargando…

Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q

BACKGROUND: Every year millions of individuals acquire scars. A literature review of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments identified content limitations in existing scar-specific measures. The aim of this study was to develop a new PRO instrument called SCAR-Q for children and adults with surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klassen, Anne F., Ziolkowski, Natalia, Mundy, Lily R., Miller, H. Catherine, McIlvride, Alison, DiLaura, Allison, Fish, Joel, Pusic, Andrea L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001672
_version_ 1783327439368224768
author Klassen, Anne F.
Ziolkowski, Natalia
Mundy, Lily R.
Miller, H. Catherine
McIlvride, Alison
DiLaura, Allison
Fish, Joel
Pusic, Andrea L.
author_facet Klassen, Anne F.
Ziolkowski, Natalia
Mundy, Lily R.
Miller, H. Catherine
McIlvride, Alison
DiLaura, Allison
Fish, Joel
Pusic, Andrea L.
author_sort Klassen, Anne F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every year millions of individuals acquire scars. A literature review of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments identified content limitations in existing scar-specific measures. The aim of this study was to develop a new PRO instrument called SCAR-Q for children and adults with surgical, traumatic, and burn scars. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the qualitative datasets used in the development of PRO instruments for plastic and reconstructive surgery, that is, BREAST-Q, FACE-Q, BODY-Q, and CLEFT-Q. The keyword “scar*” was used to extract scar-specific text. Data were analyzed to identify concepts of interest and to form a comprehensive item pool. Scales were developed and refined through multiple rounds of cognitive interviews with patients and with input from international clinical experts between July 2015 and December 2016. RESULTS: A total of 52 children and 192 adults from the qualitative datasets provided between 1 and 34 scar-specific codes (n = 1,227). The analysis led to the identification of 3 key domains for which scales were developed: scar appearance (eg, size, color, contour), scar symptoms (eg, painful, tight, itchy), and psychosocial impact (eg, feeling self-conscious, bothered by scar). Cognitive interviews with 25 adults and 20 pediatric participants with scars, plus feedback from 27 clinical experts, led to rewording and removal of items, and new items added. These steps ensured content validity for SCAR-Q in a broad range of scars. CONCLUSIONS: The SCAR-Q is now being field-tested. Once completed, we anticipate SCAR-Q will be used in clinical practice and in clinical trials to test different scar therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5977950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59779502018-06-06 Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q Klassen, Anne F. Ziolkowski, Natalia Mundy, Lily R. Miller, H. Catherine McIlvride, Alison DiLaura, Allison Fish, Joel Pusic, Andrea L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Every year millions of individuals acquire scars. A literature review of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments identified content limitations in existing scar-specific measures. The aim of this study was to develop a new PRO instrument called SCAR-Q for children and adults with surgical, traumatic, and burn scars. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the qualitative datasets used in the development of PRO instruments for plastic and reconstructive surgery, that is, BREAST-Q, FACE-Q, BODY-Q, and CLEFT-Q. The keyword “scar*” was used to extract scar-specific text. Data were analyzed to identify concepts of interest and to form a comprehensive item pool. Scales were developed and refined through multiple rounds of cognitive interviews with patients and with input from international clinical experts between July 2015 and December 2016. RESULTS: A total of 52 children and 192 adults from the qualitative datasets provided between 1 and 34 scar-specific codes (n = 1,227). The analysis led to the identification of 3 key domains for which scales were developed: scar appearance (eg, size, color, contour), scar symptoms (eg, painful, tight, itchy), and psychosocial impact (eg, feeling self-conscious, bothered by scar). Cognitive interviews with 25 adults and 20 pediatric participants with scars, plus feedback from 27 clinical experts, led to rewording and removal of items, and new items added. These steps ensured content validity for SCAR-Q in a broad range of scars. CONCLUSIONS: The SCAR-Q is now being field-tested. Once completed, we anticipate SCAR-Q will be used in clinical practice and in clinical trials to test different scar therapies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5977950/ /pubmed/29876160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001672 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Klassen, Anne F.
Ziolkowski, Natalia
Mundy, Lily R.
Miller, H. Catherine
McIlvride, Alison
DiLaura, Allison
Fish, Joel
Pusic, Andrea L.
Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q
title Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q
title_full Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q
title_fullStr Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q
title_full_unstemmed Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q
title_short Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q
title_sort development of a new patient-reported outcome instrument to evaluate treatments for scars: the scar-q
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001672
work_keys_str_mv AT klassenannef developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT ziolkowskinatalia developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT mundylilyr developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT millerhcatherine developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT mcilvridealison developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT dilauraallison developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT fishjoel developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq
AT pusicandreal developmentofanewpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumenttoevaluatetreatmentsforscarsthescarq