Cargando…

Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been proven to be oncologically safe for treating breast cancer. This procedure had been developed to optimize the esthetic outcome and reduce feeling mutilation after mastectomy. Risks of necrotic complications and diminishing nipple-areola complex (N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chirappapha, Prakasit, Srichan, Pongsakorn, Lertsithichai, Panuwat, Thaweepworadej, Panya, Sukarayothin, Thongchai, Leesombatpaiboon, Monchai, Kongdan, Youwanush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001716
_version_ 1783327443791118336
author Chirappapha, Prakasit
Srichan, Pongsakorn
Lertsithichai, Panuwat
Thaweepworadej, Panya
Sukarayothin, Thongchai
Leesombatpaiboon, Monchai
Kongdan, Youwanush
author_facet Chirappapha, Prakasit
Srichan, Pongsakorn
Lertsithichai, Panuwat
Thaweepworadej, Panya
Sukarayothin, Thongchai
Leesombatpaiboon, Monchai
Kongdan, Youwanush
author_sort Chirappapha, Prakasit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been proven to be oncologically safe for treating breast cancer. This procedure had been developed to optimize the esthetic outcome and reduce feeling mutilation after mastectomy. Risks of necrotic complications and diminishing nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensation are common complications affecting the patient’s satisfaction after the surgery. The evaluation of NAC sensation should be also investigated. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 55 NSMs that were performed on 52 patients for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications in Ramathibodi Hospital from May 2007 to September 2015. Patients’ demographics, operative details, oncologic outcome, and postoperative complications, focusing on NAC sensation and necrotic complications, were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-seven NSMs (87%) were performed for therapeutic indications, and another 7 NSMs (13%) were risk-reducing operations. Of the 43 patients performing NSM for breast cancer treatment, 33 patients (77%) had invasive cancer and 11 patients (23%) had ductal carcinoma in situ. One subareola base tissue was found an occult cancer, and the NAC was then removed. There were 3 locoregional recurrences after a median follow-up time of 24 months (range, 2–104 months). The NAC sensation was evaluated in a total of 35 patients. Twenty-five patients (46%) underwent serial evaluation after 6 months of operation, and 10 patients were evaluated at more than 1 year after operation. In the first 6 months, 11 patients (44%) showed partial sensation recovery, and 3 more patients had partial recovery after 1-year follow-up. Only 1 patient (2%) had complete sensation recovery in all area of the NAC. In late evaluation group, 7 out of 10 patients had partial recovery. Most pain sensation remained in the lower aspect of the areola away from surgical incision. CONCLUSIONS: NSM is technically feasible in selected patients with low rates of NAC removal. Some patients can preserve the NAC sensation. Long-term outcome should receive follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5977969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59779692018-06-06 Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Chirappapha, Prakasit Srichan, Pongsakorn Lertsithichai, Panuwat Thaweepworadej, Panya Sukarayothin, Thongchai Leesombatpaiboon, Monchai Kongdan, Youwanush Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been proven to be oncologically safe for treating breast cancer. This procedure had been developed to optimize the esthetic outcome and reduce feeling mutilation after mastectomy. Risks of necrotic complications and diminishing nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensation are common complications affecting the patient’s satisfaction after the surgery. The evaluation of NAC sensation should be also investigated. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 55 NSMs that were performed on 52 patients for both therapeutic and prophylactic indications in Ramathibodi Hospital from May 2007 to September 2015. Patients’ demographics, operative details, oncologic outcome, and postoperative complications, focusing on NAC sensation and necrotic complications, were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-seven NSMs (87%) were performed for therapeutic indications, and another 7 NSMs (13%) were risk-reducing operations. Of the 43 patients performing NSM for breast cancer treatment, 33 patients (77%) had invasive cancer and 11 patients (23%) had ductal carcinoma in situ. One subareola base tissue was found an occult cancer, and the NAC was then removed. There were 3 locoregional recurrences after a median follow-up time of 24 months (range, 2–104 months). The NAC sensation was evaluated in a total of 35 patients. Twenty-five patients (46%) underwent serial evaluation after 6 months of operation, and 10 patients were evaluated at more than 1 year after operation. In the first 6 months, 11 patients (44%) showed partial sensation recovery, and 3 more patients had partial recovery after 1-year follow-up. Only 1 patient (2%) had complete sensation recovery in all area of the NAC. In late evaluation group, 7 out of 10 patients had partial recovery. Most pain sensation remained in the lower aspect of the areola away from surgical incision. CONCLUSIONS: NSM is technically feasible in selected patients with low rates of NAC removal. Some patients can preserve the NAC sensation. Long-term outcome should receive follow-up. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5977969/ /pubmed/29876167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001716 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chirappapha, Prakasit
Srichan, Pongsakorn
Lertsithichai, Panuwat
Thaweepworadej, Panya
Sukarayothin, Thongchai
Leesombatpaiboon, Monchai
Kongdan, Youwanush
Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_full Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_fullStr Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_short Nipple-Areola Complex Sensation after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_sort nipple-areola complex sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29876167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001716
work_keys_str_mv AT chirappaphaprakasit nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy
AT srichanpongsakorn nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy
AT lertsithichaipanuwat nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy
AT thaweepworadejpanya nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy
AT sukarayothinthongchai nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy
AT leesombatpaiboonmonchai nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy
AT kongdanyouwanush nippleareolacomplexsensationafternipplesparingmastectomy