Cargando…

Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads

The implementation of hollow S60HS glass microspheres and Fillite 106 cenospheres in a martensitically transformable AISI 304L stainless steel matrix was realized by means of metal injection molding of feedstock with varying fractions of the filler material. The so-called TRIP-steel syntactic foams...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehinger, David, Weise, Jörg, Baumeister, Joachim, Funk, Alexander, Waske, Anja, Krüger, Lutz, Martin, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11050656
_version_ 1783327451631321088
author Ehinger, David
Weise, Jörg
Baumeister, Joachim
Funk, Alexander
Waske, Anja
Krüger, Lutz
Martin, Ulrich
author_facet Ehinger, David
Weise, Jörg
Baumeister, Joachim
Funk, Alexander
Waske, Anja
Krüger, Lutz
Martin, Ulrich
author_sort Ehinger, David
collection PubMed
description The implementation of hollow S60HS glass microspheres and Fillite 106 cenospheres in a martensitically transformable AISI 304L stainless steel matrix was realized by means of metal injection molding of feedstock with varying fractions of the filler material. The so-called TRIP-steel syntactic foams were studied with respect to their behavior under quasi-static compression and dynamic impact loading. The interplay between matrix material behavior and foam structure was discussed in relation to the findings of micro-structural investigations, electron back scatter diffraction EBSD phase analyses and magnetic measurements. During processing, the cenospheres remained relatively stable retaining their shape while the glass microspheres underwent disintegration associated with the formation of pre-cracked irregular inclusions. Consequently, the AISI 304L/Fillite 106 syntactic foams exhibited a higher compression stress level and energy absorption capability as compared to the S60HS-containing variants. The [Formula: see text] -martensite kinetic of the steel matrix was significantly influenced by material composition, strain rate and arising deformation temperature. The highest ferromagnetic [Formula: see text]-martensite phase fraction was detected for the AISI 304L/S60HS batches and the lowest for the TRIP-steel bulk material. Quasi-adiabatic sample heating, a gradual decrease in strain rate and an enhanced degree of damage controlled the mechanical deformation response of the studied syntactic foams under dynamic impact loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59780332018-05-31 Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads Ehinger, David Weise, Jörg Baumeister, Joachim Funk, Alexander Waske, Anja Krüger, Lutz Martin, Ulrich Materials (Basel) Article The implementation of hollow S60HS glass microspheres and Fillite 106 cenospheres in a martensitically transformable AISI 304L stainless steel matrix was realized by means of metal injection molding of feedstock with varying fractions of the filler material. The so-called TRIP-steel syntactic foams were studied with respect to their behavior under quasi-static compression and dynamic impact loading. The interplay between matrix material behavior and foam structure was discussed in relation to the findings of micro-structural investigations, electron back scatter diffraction EBSD phase analyses and magnetic measurements. During processing, the cenospheres remained relatively stable retaining their shape while the glass microspheres underwent disintegration associated with the formation of pre-cracked irregular inclusions. Consequently, the AISI 304L/Fillite 106 syntactic foams exhibited a higher compression stress level and energy absorption capability as compared to the S60HS-containing variants. The [Formula: see text] -martensite kinetic of the steel matrix was significantly influenced by material composition, strain rate and arising deformation temperature. The highest ferromagnetic [Formula: see text]-martensite phase fraction was detected for the AISI 304L/S60HS batches and the lowest for the TRIP-steel bulk material. Quasi-adiabatic sample heating, a gradual decrease in strain rate and an enhanced degree of damage controlled the mechanical deformation response of the studied syntactic foams under dynamic impact loading. MDPI 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5978033/ /pubmed/29695107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11050656 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ehinger, David
Weise, Jörg
Baumeister, Joachim
Funk, Alexander
Waske, Anja
Krüger, Lutz
Martin, Ulrich
Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads
title Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads
title_full Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads
title_fullStr Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads
title_full_unstemmed Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads
title_short Microstructure and Deformation Response of TRIP-Steel Syntactic Foams to Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Loads
title_sort microstructure and deformation response of trip-steel syntactic foams to quasi-static and dynamic compressive loads
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11050656
work_keys_str_mv AT ehingerdavid microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads
AT weisejorg microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads
AT baumeisterjoachim microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads
AT funkalexander microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads
AT waskeanja microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads
AT krugerlutz microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads
AT martinulrich microstructureanddeformationresponseoftripsteelsyntacticfoamstoquasistaticanddynamiccompressiveloads