Cargando…
Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields
Measuring small-magnitude strain fields using a digital image correlation (DIC) technique is challenging, due to the noise-signal ratio in strain maps. Here, we determined the level of accuracy achievable in measuring small-magnitude (<0.1%) homogeneous strain fields. We investigated different se...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29738441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11050751 |
_version_ | 1783327473727963136 |
---|---|
author | Acciaioli, Alice Lionello, Giacomo Baleani, Massimiliano |
author_facet | Acciaioli, Alice Lionello, Giacomo Baleani, Massimiliano |
author_sort | Acciaioli, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measuring small-magnitude strain fields using a digital image correlation (DIC) technique is challenging, due to the noise-signal ratio in strain maps. Here, we determined the level of accuracy achievable in measuring small-magnitude (<0.1%) homogeneous strain fields. We investigated different sets of parameters for image processing and imaging pre-selection, based on single-image noise level. The trueness of DIC was assessed by comparison of Young’s modulus (E) and Poisson’s ratio (ν) with values obtained from strain gauge measurements. Repeatability was improved, on average, by 20–25% with experimentally-determined optimal parameters and image pre-selection. Despite this, the intra- and inter-specimen repeatability of strain gauge measurements was 5 and 2.5 times better than DIC, respectively. Moreover, although trueness was also improved, on average, by 30–45%, DIC consistently overestimated the two material parameters by 1.8% and 3.2% for E and ν, respectively. DIC is a suitable option to measure small-magnitude homogeneous strain fields, bearing in mind the limitations in achievable accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5978128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59781282018-05-31 Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields Acciaioli, Alice Lionello, Giacomo Baleani, Massimiliano Materials (Basel) Article Measuring small-magnitude strain fields using a digital image correlation (DIC) technique is challenging, due to the noise-signal ratio in strain maps. Here, we determined the level of accuracy achievable in measuring small-magnitude (<0.1%) homogeneous strain fields. We investigated different sets of parameters for image processing and imaging pre-selection, based on single-image noise level. The trueness of DIC was assessed by comparison of Young’s modulus (E) and Poisson’s ratio (ν) with values obtained from strain gauge measurements. Repeatability was improved, on average, by 20–25% with experimentally-determined optimal parameters and image pre-selection. Despite this, the intra- and inter-specimen repeatability of strain gauge measurements was 5 and 2.5 times better than DIC, respectively. Moreover, although trueness was also improved, on average, by 30–45%, DIC consistently overestimated the two material parameters by 1.8% and 3.2% for E and ν, respectively. DIC is a suitable option to measure small-magnitude homogeneous strain fields, bearing in mind the limitations in achievable accuracy. MDPI 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5978128/ /pubmed/29738441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11050751 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Acciaioli, Alice Lionello, Giacomo Baleani, Massimiliano Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields |
title | Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields |
title_full | Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields |
title_fullStr | Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields |
title_short | Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields |
title_sort | experimentally achievable accuracy using a digital image correlation technique in measuring small-magnitude (<0.1%) homogeneous strain fields |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29738441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11050751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acciaiolialice experimentallyachievableaccuracyusingadigitalimagecorrelationtechniqueinmeasuringsmallmagnitude01homogeneousstrainfields AT lionellogiacomo experimentallyachievableaccuracyusingadigitalimagecorrelationtechniqueinmeasuringsmallmagnitude01homogeneousstrainfields AT baleanimassimiliano experimentallyachievableaccuracyusingadigitalimagecorrelationtechniqueinmeasuringsmallmagnitude01homogeneousstrainfields |