Cargando…

Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women

Objective: Explore potential relationships between preovulatory, periovulatory, and luteal-phase characteristics in normally cycling women. Design: Observational study. Setting: Eight European natural family planning clinics. Patient(s): Ninety-nine women contributing 266 menstrual cycles. Intervent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdulla, Saman H., Bouchard, Thomas P., Leiva, Rene A., Boyle, Phil, Iwaz, Jean, Ecochard, René
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144
_version_ 1783327530627891200
author Abdulla, Saman H.
Bouchard, Thomas P.
Leiva, Rene A.
Boyle, Phil
Iwaz, Jean
Ecochard, René
author_facet Abdulla, Saman H.
Bouchard, Thomas P.
Leiva, Rene A.
Boyle, Phil
Iwaz, Jean
Ecochard, René
author_sort Abdulla, Saman H.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Explore potential relationships between preovulatory, periovulatory, and luteal-phase characteristics in normally cycling women. Design: Observational study. Setting: Eight European natural family planning clinics. Patient(s): Ninety-nine women contributing 266 menstrual cycles. Intervention(s): The participants collected first morning urine samples that were analyzed for estrone-3 glucuronide (E1G), pregnanediol-3- alpha-glucuronide (PDG), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH). The participants underwent serial ovarian ultrasound examinations. Main Outcome Measure(s): Four outcome measures were analyzed: short luteal phase, low mid-luteal phase PDG level (mPDG), normal then low luteal PDG level, low then normal luteal PDG level. Results: A long preovulatory phase was a predictor of short luteal phase, with or without adjustment for other variables. A high periovulatory PDG level was a predictor for short luteal phase as well as normal then low luteal PDG level. A low periovulatory PDG level predicted low mPDG and low then normal luteal PDG level, with or without adjustment for other variables. A small maximum follicle predicted normal then low luteal PDG level, with or without adjustment for other variables. The relationship between small maximum follicle size and short luteal phase or small maximum follicle size and low mPDG was no longer present when the regression was adjusted for certain characteristics. A younger age at menarche and a high body mass index were both predictors of low mPDG. Conclusion: Luteal phase abnormalities exist over a spectrum where some ovulation disorders may exist as deviations from the normal ovulatory process.This study confirms the negative impact of a small follicle size on the quality of the luteal phase. The occurrence of normal then low luteal PDG level is confirmed as a potential sign of luteal phase abnormality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59784512018-06-07 Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women Abdulla, Saman H. Bouchard, Thomas P. Leiva, Rene A. Boyle, Phil Iwaz, Jean Ecochard, René Front Public Health Public Health Objective: Explore potential relationships between preovulatory, periovulatory, and luteal-phase characteristics in normally cycling women. Design: Observational study. Setting: Eight European natural family planning clinics. Patient(s): Ninety-nine women contributing 266 menstrual cycles. Intervention(s): The participants collected first morning urine samples that were analyzed for estrone-3 glucuronide (E1G), pregnanediol-3- alpha-glucuronide (PDG), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH). The participants underwent serial ovarian ultrasound examinations. Main Outcome Measure(s): Four outcome measures were analyzed: short luteal phase, low mid-luteal phase PDG level (mPDG), normal then low luteal PDG level, low then normal luteal PDG level. Results: A long preovulatory phase was a predictor of short luteal phase, with or without adjustment for other variables. A high periovulatory PDG level was a predictor for short luteal phase as well as normal then low luteal PDG level. A low periovulatory PDG level predicted low mPDG and low then normal luteal PDG level, with or without adjustment for other variables. A small maximum follicle predicted normal then low luteal PDG level, with or without adjustment for other variables. The relationship between small maximum follicle size and short luteal phase or small maximum follicle size and low mPDG was no longer present when the regression was adjusted for certain characteristics. A younger age at menarche and a high body mass index were both predictors of low mPDG. Conclusion: Luteal phase abnormalities exist over a spectrum where some ovulation disorders may exist as deviations from the normal ovulatory process.This study confirms the negative impact of a small follicle size on the quality of the luteal phase. The occurrence of normal then low luteal PDG level is confirmed as a potential sign of luteal phase abnormality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5978451/ /pubmed/29881719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144 Text en Copyright © 2018 Abdulla, Bouchard, Leiva, Boyle, Iwaz and Ecochard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Abdulla, Saman H.
Bouchard, Thomas P.
Leiva, Rene A.
Boyle, Phil
Iwaz, Jean
Ecochard, René
Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women
title Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women
title_full Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women
title_fullStr Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women
title_full_unstemmed Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women
title_short Hormonal Predictors of Abnormal Luteal Phases in Normally Cycling Women
title_sort hormonal predictors of abnormal luteal phases in normally cycling women
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00144
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullasamanh hormonalpredictorsofabnormallutealphasesinnormallycyclingwomen
AT bouchardthomasp hormonalpredictorsofabnormallutealphasesinnormallycyclingwomen
AT leivarenea hormonalpredictorsofabnormallutealphasesinnormallycyclingwomen
AT boylephil hormonalpredictorsofabnormallutealphasesinnormallycyclingwomen
AT iwazjean hormonalpredictorsofabnormallutealphasesinnormallycyclingwomen
AT ecochardrene hormonalpredictorsofabnormallutealphasesinnormallycyclingwomen