Cargando…
Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning
PURPOSE: We conducted this dosimetric analysis to evaluate the feasibility of a multi‐center stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) trial for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using different SBRT platforms. MATERIALS/METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) simulation images of 10 patients with unilatera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29542260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12308 |
_version_ | 1783327534854701056 |
---|---|
author | Baydoun, Atallah Vapiwala, Neha Ponsky, Lee E. Awan, Musaddiq Kassaee, Ali Sutton, David Podder, Tarun K. Zhang, Yuxia Dobbins, Donald Muzic, Raymond F. Traughber, Bryan Machtay, Mitchell Ellis, Rodney |
author_facet | Baydoun, Atallah Vapiwala, Neha Ponsky, Lee E. Awan, Musaddiq Kassaee, Ali Sutton, David Podder, Tarun K. Zhang, Yuxia Dobbins, Donald Muzic, Raymond F. Traughber, Bryan Machtay, Mitchell Ellis, Rodney |
author_sort | Baydoun, Atallah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We conducted this dosimetric analysis to evaluate the feasibility of a multi‐center stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) trial for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using different SBRT platforms. MATERIALS/METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) simulation images of 10 patients with unilateral RCC previously treated on a Phase 1 trial at Institution 1 were anonymized and shared with Institution 2 after IRB approval. Treatment planning was generated through five different platforms aiming a total dose of 48 Gy in three fractions. These platforms included: Cyberknife and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at institution 1, and Cyberknife, VMAT, and pencil beam scanning (PBS) Proton Therapy at institution 2. Dose constraints were based on the Phase 1 approved trial. RESULTS: Compared to Cyberknife, VMAT and PBS plans provided overall an equivalent or superior coverage to the target volume, while limiting dose to the remaining kidney, contralateral kidney, liver, spinal cord, and bowel. CONCLUSION: This dosimetric study supports the feasibility of a multi‐center trial for renal SBRT using PBS, VMAT and Cyberknife. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5978559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59785592018-06-01 Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning Baydoun, Atallah Vapiwala, Neha Ponsky, Lee E. Awan, Musaddiq Kassaee, Ali Sutton, David Podder, Tarun K. Zhang, Yuxia Dobbins, Donald Muzic, Raymond F. Traughber, Bryan Machtay, Mitchell Ellis, Rodney J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: We conducted this dosimetric analysis to evaluate the feasibility of a multi‐center stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) trial for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using different SBRT platforms. MATERIALS/METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) simulation images of 10 patients with unilateral RCC previously treated on a Phase 1 trial at Institution 1 were anonymized and shared with Institution 2 after IRB approval. Treatment planning was generated through five different platforms aiming a total dose of 48 Gy in three fractions. These platforms included: Cyberknife and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at institution 1, and Cyberknife, VMAT, and pencil beam scanning (PBS) Proton Therapy at institution 2. Dose constraints were based on the Phase 1 approved trial. RESULTS: Compared to Cyberknife, VMAT and PBS plans provided overall an equivalent or superior coverage to the target volume, while limiting dose to the remaining kidney, contralateral kidney, liver, spinal cord, and bowel. CONCLUSION: This dosimetric study supports the feasibility of a multi‐center trial for renal SBRT using PBS, VMAT and Cyberknife. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5978559/ /pubmed/29542260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12308 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Baydoun, Atallah Vapiwala, Neha Ponsky, Lee E. Awan, Musaddiq Kassaee, Ali Sutton, David Podder, Tarun K. Zhang, Yuxia Dobbins, Donald Muzic, Raymond F. Traughber, Bryan Machtay, Mitchell Ellis, Rodney Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning |
title | Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning |
title_full | Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning |
title_short | Comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using Cyberknife, VMAT and proton therapy based treatment planning |
title_sort | comparative analysis for renal stereotactic body radiotherapy using cyberknife, vmat and proton therapy based treatment planning |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29542260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baydounatallah comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT vapiwalaneha comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT ponskyleee comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT awanmusaddiq comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT kassaeeali comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT suttondavid comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT poddertarunk comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT zhangyuxia comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT dobbinsdonald comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT muzicraymondf comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT traughberbryan comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT machtaymitchell comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning AT ellisrodney comparativeanalysisforrenalstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingcyberknifevmatandprotontherapybasedtreatmentplanning |