Cargando…

Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients

PURPOSE: To distinguish clinical factors that have time-varying (as opposed to constant) impact upon patient and graft survival among pediatric liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Using national data from 2002 through 2013, we examined potential clinical and demographic covariates using Gray’s pie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryce, Cindy L., Chang, Chung Chou H., Ren, Yi, Yabes, Jonathan, Zenarosa, Gabriel, Iyer, Aditya, Tomko, Heather, Squires, Robert H., Roberts, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198132
_version_ 1783327573823979520
author Bryce, Cindy L.
Chang, Chung Chou H.
Ren, Yi
Yabes, Jonathan
Zenarosa, Gabriel
Iyer, Aditya
Tomko, Heather
Squires, Robert H.
Roberts, Mark S.
author_facet Bryce, Cindy L.
Chang, Chung Chou H.
Ren, Yi
Yabes, Jonathan
Zenarosa, Gabriel
Iyer, Aditya
Tomko, Heather
Squires, Robert H.
Roberts, Mark S.
author_sort Bryce, Cindy L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To distinguish clinical factors that have time-varying (as opposed to constant) impact upon patient and graft survival among pediatric liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Using national data from 2002 through 2013, we examined potential clinical and demographic covariates using Gray’s piecewise constant time-varying coefficients (TVC) models. For both patient and graft survival, we estimated univariable and multivariable Gray’s TVC, retaining significant covariates based on backward selection. We then estimated the same specification using traditional Cox proportional hazards (PH) models and compared our findings. RESULTS: For patient survival, covariates included recipient diagnosis, age, race/ethnicity, ventilator support, encephalopathy, creatinine levels, use of living donor, and donor age. Only the effects of recipient diagnosis and donor age were constant; effects of other covariates varied over time. We retained identical covariates in the graft survival model but found several differences in their impact. CONCLUSION: The flexibility afforded by Gray’s TVC estimation methods identify several covariates that do not satisfy constant proportionality assumptions of the Cox PH model. Incorporating better survival estimates is critical for improving risk prediction tools used by the transplant community to inform organ allocation decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59788792018-06-17 Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients Bryce, Cindy L. Chang, Chung Chou H. Ren, Yi Yabes, Jonathan Zenarosa, Gabriel Iyer, Aditya Tomko, Heather Squires, Robert H. Roberts, Mark S. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To distinguish clinical factors that have time-varying (as opposed to constant) impact upon patient and graft survival among pediatric liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Using national data from 2002 through 2013, we examined potential clinical and demographic covariates using Gray’s piecewise constant time-varying coefficients (TVC) models. For both patient and graft survival, we estimated univariable and multivariable Gray’s TVC, retaining significant covariates based on backward selection. We then estimated the same specification using traditional Cox proportional hazards (PH) models and compared our findings. RESULTS: For patient survival, covariates included recipient diagnosis, age, race/ethnicity, ventilator support, encephalopathy, creatinine levels, use of living donor, and donor age. Only the effects of recipient diagnosis and donor age were constant; effects of other covariates varied over time. We retained identical covariates in the graft survival model but found several differences in their impact. CONCLUSION: The flexibility afforded by Gray’s TVC estimation methods identify several covariates that do not satisfy constant proportionality assumptions of the Cox PH model. Incorporating better survival estimates is critical for improving risk prediction tools used by the transplant community to inform organ allocation decisions. Public Library of Science 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5978879/ /pubmed/29851966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198132 Text en © 2018 Bryce et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bryce, Cindy L.
Chang, Chung Chou H.
Ren, Yi
Yabes, Jonathan
Zenarosa, Gabriel
Iyer, Aditya
Tomko, Heather
Squires, Robert H.
Roberts, Mark S.
Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
title Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
title_full Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
title_fullStr Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
title_short Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
title_sort using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198132
work_keys_str_mv AT brycecindyl usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT changchungchouh usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT renyi usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT yabesjonathan usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT zenarosagabriel usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT iyeraditya usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT tomkoheather usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT squiresroberth usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients
AT robertsmarks usingtimevaryingmodelstoestimateposttransplantsurvivalinpediatriclivertransplantrecipients