Cargando…

Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?

BACKGROUND: Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a high throughput technique that measures absorbance of specific wavelengths of light by biological samples and uses this information to classify the age of lab-reared mosquitoes as younger or older than seven days with an average accuracy greater tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milali, Masabho P., Sikulu-Lord, Maggy T., Kiware, Samson S., Dowell, Floyd E., Povinelli, Richard J., Corliss, George F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198245
_version_ 1783327575963074560
author Milali, Masabho P.
Sikulu-Lord, Maggy T.
Kiware, Samson S.
Dowell, Floyd E.
Povinelli, Richard J.
Corliss, George F.
author_facet Milali, Masabho P.
Sikulu-Lord, Maggy T.
Kiware, Samson S.
Dowell, Floyd E.
Povinelli, Richard J.
Corliss, George F.
author_sort Milali, Masabho P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a high throughput technique that measures absorbance of specific wavelengths of light by biological samples and uses this information to classify the age of lab-reared mosquitoes as younger or older than seven days with an average accuracy greater than 80%. For NIRS to estimate ages of wild mosquitoes, a sample of wild mosquitoes with known age in days would be required to train and test the model. Mark-release-recapture is the most reliable method to produce wild-caught mosquitoes of known age in days. However, it is logistically demanding, time inefficient, subject to low recapture rates, and raises ethical issues due to the release of mosquitoes. Using labels from Detinova dissection results in a mathematical model with poor accuracy. Alternatively, a model trained on spectra from laboratory-reared mosquitoes where age in days is known can be applied to estimate the age of wild mosquitoes, but this would be appropriate only if spectra collected from laboratory-reared and wild mosquitoes are similar. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed k-means (k = 2) cluster analysis on a mixture of spectra collected from lab-reared and wild Anopheles arabiensis to determine if there is any significant difference between these two groups. While controlling the numbers of mosquitoes included in the model at each age, we found two clusters with no significant difference in distribution of spectra collected from lab-reared and wild mosquitoes (p = 0.25). We repeated the analysis using hierarchical clustering, and similarly, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: We find no difference between spectra collected from laboratory-reared and wild mosquitoes of the same age and species. The results strengthen and support the on-going practice of applying the model trained on spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes, especially first-generation laboratory-reared mosquitoes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59788882018-06-17 Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes? Milali, Masabho P. Sikulu-Lord, Maggy T. Kiware, Samson S. Dowell, Floyd E. Povinelli, Richard J. Corliss, George F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a high throughput technique that measures absorbance of specific wavelengths of light by biological samples and uses this information to classify the age of lab-reared mosquitoes as younger or older than seven days with an average accuracy greater than 80%. For NIRS to estimate ages of wild mosquitoes, a sample of wild mosquitoes with known age in days would be required to train and test the model. Mark-release-recapture is the most reliable method to produce wild-caught mosquitoes of known age in days. However, it is logistically demanding, time inefficient, subject to low recapture rates, and raises ethical issues due to the release of mosquitoes. Using labels from Detinova dissection results in a mathematical model with poor accuracy. Alternatively, a model trained on spectra from laboratory-reared mosquitoes where age in days is known can be applied to estimate the age of wild mosquitoes, but this would be appropriate only if spectra collected from laboratory-reared and wild mosquitoes are similar. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed k-means (k = 2) cluster analysis on a mixture of spectra collected from lab-reared and wild Anopheles arabiensis to determine if there is any significant difference between these two groups. While controlling the numbers of mosquitoes included in the model at each age, we found two clusters with no significant difference in distribution of spectra collected from lab-reared and wild mosquitoes (p = 0.25). We repeated the analysis using hierarchical clustering, and similarly, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: We find no difference between spectra collected from laboratory-reared and wild mosquitoes of the same age and species. The results strengthen and support the on-going practice of applying the model trained on spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes, especially first-generation laboratory-reared mosquitoes. Public Library of Science 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5978888/ /pubmed/29851994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198245 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Milali, Masabho P.
Sikulu-Lord, Maggy T.
Kiware, Samson S.
Dowell, Floyd E.
Povinelli, Richard J.
Corliss, George F.
Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
title Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
title_full Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
title_fullStr Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
title_full_unstemmed Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
title_short Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
title_sort do nir spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198245
work_keys_str_mv AT milalimasabhop donirspectracollectedfromlaboratoryrearedmosquitoesdifferfromthosecollectedfromwildmosquitoes
AT sikululordmaggyt donirspectracollectedfromlaboratoryrearedmosquitoesdifferfromthosecollectedfromwildmosquitoes
AT kiwaresamsons donirspectracollectedfromlaboratoryrearedmosquitoesdifferfromthosecollectedfromwildmosquitoes
AT dowellfloyde donirspectracollectedfromlaboratoryrearedmosquitoesdifferfromthosecollectedfromwildmosquitoes
AT povinellirichardj donirspectracollectedfromlaboratoryrearedmosquitoesdifferfromthosecollectedfromwildmosquitoes
AT corlissgeorgef donirspectracollectedfromlaboratoryrearedmosquitoesdifferfromthosecollectedfromwildmosquitoes