Cargando…

Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE: Tumor motion amplitude varies during treatment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intra‐ and interfraction tumor motion and variability in patients with liver cancer treated with fiducial‐based real‐time tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Fourteen liver pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Zhiwen, Liu, Hongyuan, Xue, Jun, Hu, Bin, Zhu, Bin, Li, Qin, Zhang, Sheng, Wu, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12292
_version_ 1783327588060495872
author Liang, Zhiwen
Liu, Hongyuan
Xue, Jun
Hu, Bin
Zhu, Bin
Li, Qin
Zhang, Sheng
Wu, Gang
author_facet Liang, Zhiwen
Liu, Hongyuan
Xue, Jun
Hu, Bin
Zhu, Bin
Li, Qin
Zhang, Sheng
Wu, Gang
author_sort Liang, Zhiwen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Tumor motion amplitude varies during treatment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intra‐ and interfraction tumor motion and variability in patients with liver cancer treated with fiducial‐based real‐time tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Fourteen liver patients were treated with SBRT using a CyberKnife. Two to four fiducial markers implanted near the tumor were used for real‐time monitoring using the Synchrony system. The tumor motion information during treatment was extracted from the log files recorded by the Synchrony system. Logfile‐based amplitudes in the superior–posterior (SI), left–right (LR) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions were compared to the 4DCT‐based amplitudes. The intra‐ and interfraction amplitude variations and the incidence of baseline shifts were analyzed for 66 fractions administered to 14 patients. RESULTS: The median (range) logfile‐based liver motion amplitudes for all patients were 11.9 (5.1–17.3) mm, 1.3 (0.4–4) mm and 3.8 (0.9–7.7) mm in the SI, LR and AP directions, respectively. Compared with the logfile‐based amplitude, the 4DCT‐based amplitude was underestimated (P < 0.05). The median (range) intra‐ and interfraction liver motion amplitude variations were 4.3 (1.6–6.0) mm (SI), 0.5 (0.2–2.2) mm(LR) and 1.5 (0.3–3.3) mm (AP) and 1.7 (0.5–4.6) mm (SI), 0.3 (0.1–3.0) mm (LR) and 0.7 (0.3–2.7) mm (AP), respectively. Baseline shifts exceeding 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm were observed in 27.3%, 7.6% and 3% of the measurements, respectively, within 10 min, and in 66.7%, 38.1% and 19%, respectively, within 30 min for the square root of the sum of the squares of the distances in the SI, LR and AP directions (3D). The tumor motion amplitude was found to be correlated with the baseline shift. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients showed significant intra‐ and interfraction liver motion amplitude variations over the entire course of radiation. More caution is needed for patients with large tumor motion amplitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59789392018-06-01 Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy Liang, Zhiwen Liu, Hongyuan Xue, Jun Hu, Bin Zhu, Bin Li, Qin Zhang, Sheng Wu, Gang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Tumor motion amplitude varies during treatment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intra‐ and interfraction tumor motion and variability in patients with liver cancer treated with fiducial‐based real‐time tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Fourteen liver patients were treated with SBRT using a CyberKnife. Two to four fiducial markers implanted near the tumor were used for real‐time monitoring using the Synchrony system. The tumor motion information during treatment was extracted from the log files recorded by the Synchrony system. Logfile‐based amplitudes in the superior–posterior (SI), left–right (LR) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions were compared to the 4DCT‐based amplitudes. The intra‐ and interfraction amplitude variations and the incidence of baseline shifts were analyzed for 66 fractions administered to 14 patients. RESULTS: The median (range) logfile‐based liver motion amplitudes for all patients were 11.9 (5.1–17.3) mm, 1.3 (0.4–4) mm and 3.8 (0.9–7.7) mm in the SI, LR and AP directions, respectively. Compared with the logfile‐based amplitude, the 4DCT‐based amplitude was underestimated (P < 0.05). The median (range) intra‐ and interfraction liver motion amplitude variations were 4.3 (1.6–6.0) mm (SI), 0.5 (0.2–2.2) mm(LR) and 1.5 (0.3–3.3) mm (AP) and 1.7 (0.5–4.6) mm (SI), 0.3 (0.1–3.0) mm (LR) and 0.7 (0.3–2.7) mm (AP), respectively. Baseline shifts exceeding 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm were observed in 27.3%, 7.6% and 3% of the measurements, respectively, within 10 min, and in 66.7%, 38.1% and 19%, respectively, within 30 min for the square root of the sum of the squares of the distances in the SI, LR and AP directions (3D). The tumor motion amplitude was found to be correlated with the baseline shift. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients showed significant intra‐ and interfraction liver motion amplitude variations over the entire course of radiation. More caution is needed for patients with large tumor motion amplitudes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5978939/ /pubmed/29493095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12292 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Liang, Zhiwen
Liu, Hongyuan
Xue, Jun
Hu, Bin
Zhu, Bin
Li, Qin
Zhang, Sheng
Wu, Gang
Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
title Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_full Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_short Evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_sort evaluation of the intra‐ and interfractional tumor motion and variability by fiducial‐based real‐time tracking in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12292
work_keys_str_mv AT liangzhiwen evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT liuhongyuan evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT xuejun evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT hubin evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT zhubin evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT liqin evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT zhangsheng evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT wugang evaluationoftheintraandinterfractionaltumormotionandvariabilitybyfiducialbasedrealtimetrackinginliverstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy