Cargando…
Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
PURPOSE: Two dose calculation algorithms are available in Varian Eclipse software: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB). Many Varian Eclipse‐based centers have access to AXB; however, a thorough understanding of how it will affect plan characteristics and, subsequent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12329 |
_version_ | 1783327588983242752 |
---|---|
author | Guebert, Alexandra Conroy, Leigh Weppler, Sarah Alghamdi, Majed Conway, Jessica Harper, Lindsay Phan, Tien Olivotto, Ivo A. Smith, Wendy L. Quirk, Sarah |
author_facet | Guebert, Alexandra Conroy, Leigh Weppler, Sarah Alghamdi, Majed Conway, Jessica Harper, Lindsay Phan, Tien Olivotto, Ivo A. Smith, Wendy L. Quirk, Sarah |
author_sort | Guebert, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Two dose calculation algorithms are available in Varian Eclipse software: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB). Many Varian Eclipse‐based centers have access to AXB; however, a thorough understanding of how it will affect plan characteristics and, subsequently, clinical practice is necessary prior to implementation. We characterized the difference in breast plan quality between AXB and AAA for dissemination to clinicians during implementation. METHODS: Locoregional irradiation plans were created with AAA for 30 breast cancer patients with a prescription dose of 50 Gy to the breast and 45 Gy to the regional node, in 25 fractions. The internal mammary chain (IMC(CTV)) nodes were covered by 80% of the breast dose. AXB, both dose‐to‐water and dose‐to‐medium reporting, was used to recalculate plans while maintaining constant monitor units. Target coverage and organ‐at‐risk doses were compared between the two algorithms using dose–volume parameters. An analysis to assess location‐specific changes was performed by dividing the breast into nine subvolumes in the superior–inferior and left–right directions. RESULTS: There were minimal differences found between the AXB and AAA calculated plans. The median difference between AXB and AAA for breast(CTV) V (95%), was <2.5%. For IMC(CTV), the median differences V (95%), and V (80%) were <5% and 0%, respectively; indicating IMC(CTV) coverage only decreased when marginally covered. Mean superficial dose increased by a median of 3.2 Gy. In the subvolume analysis, the medial subvolumes were “hotter” when recalculated with AXB and the lateral subvolumes “cooler” with AXB; however, all differences were within 2 Gy. CONCLUSION: We observed minimal difference in magnitude and spatial distribution of dose when comparing the two algorithms. The largest observable differences occurred in superficial dose regions. Therefore, clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast radiotherapy is not expected to result in changes in clinical practice for prescribing or planning breast radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5978944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59789442018-06-01 Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis Guebert, Alexandra Conroy, Leigh Weppler, Sarah Alghamdi, Majed Conway, Jessica Harper, Lindsay Phan, Tien Olivotto, Ivo A. Smith, Wendy L. Quirk, Sarah J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Two dose calculation algorithms are available in Varian Eclipse software: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB). Many Varian Eclipse‐based centers have access to AXB; however, a thorough understanding of how it will affect plan characteristics and, subsequently, clinical practice is necessary prior to implementation. We characterized the difference in breast plan quality between AXB and AAA for dissemination to clinicians during implementation. METHODS: Locoregional irradiation plans were created with AAA for 30 breast cancer patients with a prescription dose of 50 Gy to the breast and 45 Gy to the regional node, in 25 fractions. The internal mammary chain (IMC(CTV)) nodes were covered by 80% of the breast dose. AXB, both dose‐to‐water and dose‐to‐medium reporting, was used to recalculate plans while maintaining constant monitor units. Target coverage and organ‐at‐risk doses were compared between the two algorithms using dose–volume parameters. An analysis to assess location‐specific changes was performed by dividing the breast into nine subvolumes in the superior–inferior and left–right directions. RESULTS: There were minimal differences found between the AXB and AAA calculated plans. The median difference between AXB and AAA for breast(CTV) V (95%), was <2.5%. For IMC(CTV), the median differences V (95%), and V (80%) were <5% and 0%, respectively; indicating IMC(CTV) coverage only decreased when marginally covered. Mean superficial dose increased by a median of 3.2 Gy. In the subvolume analysis, the medial subvolumes were “hotter” when recalculated with AXB and the lateral subvolumes “cooler” with AXB; however, all differences were within 2 Gy. CONCLUSION: We observed minimal difference in magnitude and spatial distribution of dose when comparing the two algorithms. The largest observable differences occurred in superficial dose regions. Therefore, clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast radiotherapy is not expected to result in changes in clinical practice for prescribing or planning breast radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5978944/ /pubmed/29696752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12329 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Guebert, Alexandra Conroy, Leigh Weppler, Sarah Alghamdi, Majed Conway, Jessica Harper, Lindsay Phan, Tien Olivotto, Ivo A. Smith, Wendy L. Quirk, Sarah Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis |
title | Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis |
title_full | Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis |
title_short | Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis |
title_sort | clinical implementation of axb from aaa for breast: plan quality and subvolume analysis |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12329 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guebertalexandra clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT conroyleigh clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT wepplersarah clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT alghamdimajed clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT conwayjessica clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT harperlindsay clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT phantien clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT olivottoivoa clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT smithwendyl clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis AT quirksarah clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis |