Cargando…

Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis

PURPOSE: Two dose calculation algorithms are available in Varian Eclipse software: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB). Many Varian Eclipse‐based centers have access to AXB; however, a thorough understanding of how it will affect plan characteristics and, subsequent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guebert, Alexandra, Conroy, Leigh, Weppler, Sarah, Alghamdi, Majed, Conway, Jessica, Harper, Lindsay, Phan, Tien, Olivotto, Ivo A., Smith, Wendy L., Quirk, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12329
_version_ 1783327588983242752
author Guebert, Alexandra
Conroy, Leigh
Weppler, Sarah
Alghamdi, Majed
Conway, Jessica
Harper, Lindsay
Phan, Tien
Olivotto, Ivo A.
Smith, Wendy L.
Quirk, Sarah
author_facet Guebert, Alexandra
Conroy, Leigh
Weppler, Sarah
Alghamdi, Majed
Conway, Jessica
Harper, Lindsay
Phan, Tien
Olivotto, Ivo A.
Smith, Wendy L.
Quirk, Sarah
author_sort Guebert, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Two dose calculation algorithms are available in Varian Eclipse software: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB). Many Varian Eclipse‐based centers have access to AXB; however, a thorough understanding of how it will affect plan characteristics and, subsequently, clinical practice is necessary prior to implementation. We characterized the difference in breast plan quality between AXB and AAA for dissemination to clinicians during implementation. METHODS: Locoregional irradiation plans were created with AAA for 30 breast cancer patients with a prescription dose of 50 Gy to the breast and 45 Gy to the regional node, in 25 fractions. The internal mammary chain (IMC(CTV)) nodes were covered by 80% of the breast dose. AXB, both dose‐to‐water and dose‐to‐medium reporting, was used to recalculate plans while maintaining constant monitor units. Target coverage and organ‐at‐risk doses were compared between the two algorithms using dose–volume parameters. An analysis to assess location‐specific changes was performed by dividing the breast into nine subvolumes in the superior–inferior and left–right directions. RESULTS: There were minimal differences found between the AXB and AAA calculated plans. The median difference between AXB and AAA for breast(CTV) V (95%), was <2.5%. For IMC(CTV), the median differences V (95%), and V (80%) were <5% and 0%, respectively; indicating IMC(CTV) coverage only decreased when marginally covered. Mean superficial dose increased by a median of 3.2 Gy. In the subvolume analysis, the medial subvolumes were “hotter” when recalculated with AXB and the lateral subvolumes “cooler” with AXB; however, all differences were within 2 Gy. CONCLUSION: We observed minimal difference in magnitude and spatial distribution of dose when comparing the two algorithms. The largest observable differences occurred in superficial dose regions. Therefore, clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast radiotherapy is not expected to result in changes in clinical practice for prescribing or planning breast radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59789442018-06-01 Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis Guebert, Alexandra Conroy, Leigh Weppler, Sarah Alghamdi, Majed Conway, Jessica Harper, Lindsay Phan, Tien Olivotto, Ivo A. Smith, Wendy L. Quirk, Sarah J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Two dose calculation algorithms are available in Varian Eclipse software: Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros External Beam (AXB). Many Varian Eclipse‐based centers have access to AXB; however, a thorough understanding of how it will affect plan characteristics and, subsequently, clinical practice is necessary prior to implementation. We characterized the difference in breast plan quality between AXB and AAA for dissemination to clinicians during implementation. METHODS: Locoregional irradiation plans were created with AAA for 30 breast cancer patients with a prescription dose of 50 Gy to the breast and 45 Gy to the regional node, in 25 fractions. The internal mammary chain (IMC(CTV)) nodes were covered by 80% of the breast dose. AXB, both dose‐to‐water and dose‐to‐medium reporting, was used to recalculate plans while maintaining constant monitor units. Target coverage and organ‐at‐risk doses were compared between the two algorithms using dose–volume parameters. An analysis to assess location‐specific changes was performed by dividing the breast into nine subvolumes in the superior–inferior and left–right directions. RESULTS: There were minimal differences found between the AXB and AAA calculated plans. The median difference between AXB and AAA for breast(CTV) V (95%), was <2.5%. For IMC(CTV), the median differences V (95%), and V (80%) were <5% and 0%, respectively; indicating IMC(CTV) coverage only decreased when marginally covered. Mean superficial dose increased by a median of 3.2 Gy. In the subvolume analysis, the medial subvolumes were “hotter” when recalculated with AXB and the lateral subvolumes “cooler” with AXB; however, all differences were within 2 Gy. CONCLUSION: We observed minimal difference in magnitude and spatial distribution of dose when comparing the two algorithms. The largest observable differences occurred in superficial dose regions. Therefore, clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast radiotherapy is not expected to result in changes in clinical practice for prescribing or planning breast radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5978944/ /pubmed/29696752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12329 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Guebert, Alexandra
Conroy, Leigh
Weppler, Sarah
Alghamdi, Majed
Conway, Jessica
Harper, Lindsay
Phan, Tien
Olivotto, Ivo A.
Smith, Wendy L.
Quirk, Sarah
Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
title Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
title_full Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
title_fullStr Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
title_short Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis
title_sort clinical implementation of axb from aaa for breast: plan quality and subvolume analysis
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12329
work_keys_str_mv AT guebertalexandra clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT conroyleigh clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT wepplersarah clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT alghamdimajed clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT conwayjessica clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT harperlindsay clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT phantien clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT olivottoivoa clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT smithwendyl clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis
AT quirksarah clinicalimplementationofaxbfromaaaforbreastplanqualityandsubvolumeanalysis