Cargando…

Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to experimentally validate UF‐RIPSA, a rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm developed at the University of Florida using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) and tissue‐equivalent phantoms. METHODS: The OSLDs used in this study were I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borrego, David, Marshall, Emily L., Tran, Trung, Siragusa, Daniel A., Bolch, Wesley E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29577612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12312
_version_ 1783327594743070720
author Borrego, David
Marshall, Emily L.
Tran, Trung
Siragusa, Daniel A.
Bolch, Wesley E.
author_facet Borrego, David
Marshall, Emily L.
Tran, Trung
Siragusa, Daniel A.
Bolch, Wesley E.
author_sort Borrego, David
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to experimentally validate UF‐RIPSA, a rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm developed at the University of Florida using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) and tissue‐equivalent phantoms. METHODS: The OSLDs used in this study were InLight(TM) Nanodot dosimeters by Landauer, Inc. The OSLDs were exposed to nine different beam qualities while either free‐in‐air or on the surface of a tissue equivalent phantom. The irradiation of the OSLDs was then modeled using Monte Carlo techniques to derive correction factors between free‐in‐air exposures and more complex irradiation geometries. A grid of OSLDs on the surface of a tissue equivalent phantom was irradiated with two fluoroscopic x ray fields generated by the Siemens Artis zee bi‐plane fluoroscopic unit. The location of each OSLD within the grid was noted and its dose reading compared with UF‐RIPSA results. RESULTS: With the use of Monte Carlo correction factors, the OSLD's response under complex irradiation geometries can be predicted from its free‐in‐air response. The predicted values had a percent error of −8.7% to +3.2% with a predicted value that was on average 5% below the measured value. Agreement within 9% was observed between the values of the OSLDs and RIPSA when irradiated directly on the phantom and within 14% when the beam first traverses the tabletop and pad. CONCLUSIONS: The UF‐RIPSA only computes dose values to areas of irradiated skin determined to be directly within the x ray field since the algorithm is based upon ray tracing of the reported reference air kerma value, with subsequent corrections for air‐to‐tissue dose conversion, x ray backscatter, and table/pad attenuation. The UF‐RIPSA algorithm thus does not include the dose contribution of scatter radiation from adjacent fields. Despite this limitation, UF‐RIPSA is shown to be fairly robust when computing skin dose to patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5978976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59789762018-06-01 Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions Borrego, David Marshall, Emily L. Tran, Trung Siragusa, Daniel A. Bolch, Wesley E. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to experimentally validate UF‐RIPSA, a rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm developed at the University of Florida using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) and tissue‐equivalent phantoms. METHODS: The OSLDs used in this study were InLight(TM) Nanodot dosimeters by Landauer, Inc. The OSLDs were exposed to nine different beam qualities while either free‐in‐air or on the surface of a tissue equivalent phantom. The irradiation of the OSLDs was then modeled using Monte Carlo techniques to derive correction factors between free‐in‐air exposures and more complex irradiation geometries. A grid of OSLDs on the surface of a tissue equivalent phantom was irradiated with two fluoroscopic x ray fields generated by the Siemens Artis zee bi‐plane fluoroscopic unit. The location of each OSLD within the grid was noted and its dose reading compared with UF‐RIPSA results. RESULTS: With the use of Monte Carlo correction factors, the OSLD's response under complex irradiation geometries can be predicted from its free‐in‐air response. The predicted values had a percent error of −8.7% to +3.2% with a predicted value that was on average 5% below the measured value. Agreement within 9% was observed between the values of the OSLDs and RIPSA when irradiated directly on the phantom and within 14% when the beam first traverses the tabletop and pad. CONCLUSIONS: The UF‐RIPSA only computes dose values to areas of irradiated skin determined to be directly within the x ray field since the algorithm is based upon ray tracing of the reported reference air kerma value, with subsequent corrections for air‐to‐tissue dose conversion, x ray backscatter, and table/pad attenuation. The UF‐RIPSA algorithm thus does not include the dose contribution of scatter radiation from adjacent fields. Despite this limitation, UF‐RIPSA is shown to be fairly robust when computing skin dose to patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided interventions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5978976/ /pubmed/29577612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12312 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Borrego, David
Marshall, Emily L.
Tran, Trung
Siragusa, Daniel A.
Bolch, Wesley E.
Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
title Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
title_full Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
title_fullStr Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
title_full_unstemmed Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
title_short Physical validation of UF‐RIPSA: A rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
title_sort physical validation of uf‐ripsa: a rapid in‐clinic peak skin dose mapping algorithm for fluoroscopically guided interventions
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29577612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12312
work_keys_str_mv AT borregodavid physicalvalidationofufripsaarapidinclinicpeakskindosemappingalgorithmforfluoroscopicallyguidedinterventions
AT marshallemilyl physicalvalidationofufripsaarapidinclinicpeakskindosemappingalgorithmforfluoroscopicallyguidedinterventions
AT trantrung physicalvalidationofufripsaarapidinclinicpeakskindosemappingalgorithmforfluoroscopicallyguidedinterventions
AT siragusadaniela physicalvalidationofufripsaarapidinclinicpeakskindosemappingalgorithmforfluoroscopicallyguidedinterventions
AT bolchwesleye physicalvalidationofufripsaarapidinclinicpeakskindosemappingalgorithmforfluoroscopicallyguidedinterventions