Cargando…

Normal development of context processing using the AXCPT paradigm

Context processing involves a flexible and continually updated representation of task relevant information and is a core aspect of cognitive control. The expectancy AX Continuous Performance Test (AXCPT) was designed to specifically measure context processing and has been widely applied to elucidate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polizzotto, Nicola Riccardo, Hill-Jarrett, Tanisha, Walker, Christopher, Cho, Raymond Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5979008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29852005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197812
Descripción
Sumario:Context processing involves a flexible and continually updated representation of task relevant information and is a core aspect of cognitive control. The expectancy AX Continuous Performance Test (AXCPT) was designed to specifically measure context processing and has been widely applied to elucidate mechanisms of cognitive control and their impairments in conditions such as aging and schizophrenia. Here we present a large-sample, cross-sectional study of context processing aimed at characterizing its normal development from childhood to early adulthood (8 to 22 years old). We track the age-related changes in the standard AXCPT performance measures and also investigate their validity using detailed data-driven method. We show how critical maturational changes in context processing can be validly tracked from mid-adolescence onward with increasing reliance on preparatory, proactive strategies well into early adulthood. However, the early maturation from childhood into adolescence showed a sharp, two-fold discontinuity: while standard measures provide partially conflicting results suggesting an early worsening of proactive strategies, further analyses do not support their validity during this period. Our findings advocate the existence of multiple preparatory strategies that cannot be captured by indices that assume a simple dichotomy of proactive vs. reactive strategies. When evaluating context processing differences over development or in clinical populations, we advocate the explicit testing of the assumptions underlying standard AXCPT indices through complementary data-driven methods.