Cargando…

Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth

We argue that reproductive suppression has clinical implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion. We theorize that the incidence of births before the 28th week of gestation, which contribute disproportionately to infant morbidity and mortality, varies over time in part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catalano, Ralph, Bruckner, Tim A., Karasek, Deborah, Yang, Wei, Shaw, Gary M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5979761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12585
_version_ 1783327762195415040
author Catalano, Ralph
Bruckner, Tim A.
Karasek, Deborah
Yang, Wei
Shaw, Gary M.
author_facet Catalano, Ralph
Bruckner, Tim A.
Karasek, Deborah
Yang, Wei
Shaw, Gary M.
author_sort Catalano, Ralph
collection PubMed
description We argue that reproductive suppression has clinical implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion. We theorize that the incidence of births before the 28th week of gestation, which contribute disproportionately to infant morbidity and mortality, varies over time in part due to reproductive suppression in the form of selection in utero. We further theorize that the prevalence of structural birth defects among survivors to birth from conception cohorts gauges selection in utero. We based these theories on literature positing that natural selection conserved mechanisms that spontaneously abort “risky” pregnancies including those otherwise likely to yield infants with structural birth defects or small‐for‐gestational age males. We test our theory using high‐quality birth defect surveillance data. We identify 479,885 male infants exposed to strong selection defined as membership in conception cohorts ranked in the lowest quartile of odds of a birth defect among live‐born females. We estimate the risk of periviable birth among these infants as a function of selective pressure as well as of mother's race/ethnicity and age. We find that male infants from exposed conception cohorts exhibited 10% lower odds of periviable birth than males from other conception cohorts. Our findings support the argument that selection in utero has implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5979761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59797612018-06-06 Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth Catalano, Ralph Bruckner, Tim A. Karasek, Deborah Yang, Wei Shaw, Gary M. Evol Appl Original Articles We argue that reproductive suppression has clinical implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion. We theorize that the incidence of births before the 28th week of gestation, which contribute disproportionately to infant morbidity and mortality, varies over time in part due to reproductive suppression in the form of selection in utero. We further theorize that the prevalence of structural birth defects among survivors to birth from conception cohorts gauges selection in utero. We based these theories on literature positing that natural selection conserved mechanisms that spontaneously abort “risky” pregnancies including those otherwise likely to yield infants with structural birth defects or small‐for‐gestational age males. We test our theory using high‐quality birth defect surveillance data. We identify 479,885 male infants exposed to strong selection defined as membership in conception cohorts ranked in the lowest quartile of odds of a birth defect among live‐born females. We estimate the risk of periviable birth among these infants as a function of selective pressure as well as of mother's race/ethnicity and age. We find that male infants from exposed conception cohorts exhibited 10% lower odds of periviable birth than males from other conception cohorts. Our findings support the argument that selection in utero has implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5979761/ /pubmed/29875817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12585 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Catalano, Ralph
Bruckner, Tim A.
Karasek, Deborah
Yang, Wei
Shaw, Gary M.
Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
title Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
title_full Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
title_fullStr Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
title_short Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
title_sort reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5979761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12585
work_keys_str_mv AT catalanoralph reproductivesuppressionbirthdefectsandperiviablebirth
AT brucknertima reproductivesuppressionbirthdefectsandperiviablebirth
AT karasekdeborah reproductivesuppressionbirthdefectsandperiviablebirth
AT yangwei reproductivesuppressionbirthdefectsandperiviablebirth
AT shawgarym reproductivesuppressionbirthdefectsandperiviablebirth