Cargando…
Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta
One of the challenges in conservation is determining patterns and responses in population density and distribution as it relates to habitat and changes in anthropogenic activities. We applied spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) methods, combined with density surface modelling from five grizz...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23502-3 |
_version_ | 1783327831092101120 |
---|---|
author | Boulanger, John Nielsen, Scott E. Stenhouse, Gordon B. |
author_facet | Boulanger, John Nielsen, Scott E. Stenhouse, Gordon B. |
author_sort | Boulanger, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the challenges in conservation is determining patterns and responses in population density and distribution as it relates to habitat and changes in anthropogenic activities. We applied spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) methods, combined with density surface modelling from five grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) management areas (BMAs) in Alberta, Canada, to assess SECR methods and to explore factors influencing bear distribution. Here we used models of grizzly bear habitat and mortality risk to test local density associations using density surface modelling. Results demonstrated BMA-specific factors influenced density, as well as the effects of habitat and topography on detections and movements of bears. Estimates from SECR were similar to those from closed population models and telemetry data, but with similar or higher levels of precision. Habitat was most associated with areas of higher bear density in the north, whereas mortality risk was most associated (negatively) with density of bears in the south. Comparisons of the distribution of mortality risk and habitat revealed differences by BMA that in turn influenced local abundance of bears. Combining SECR methods with density surface modelling increases the resolution of mark-recapture methods by directly inferring the effect of spatial factors on regulating local densities of animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5980105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59801052018-06-06 Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta Boulanger, John Nielsen, Scott E. Stenhouse, Gordon B. Sci Rep Article One of the challenges in conservation is determining patterns and responses in population density and distribution as it relates to habitat and changes in anthropogenic activities. We applied spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) methods, combined with density surface modelling from five grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) management areas (BMAs) in Alberta, Canada, to assess SECR methods and to explore factors influencing bear distribution. Here we used models of grizzly bear habitat and mortality risk to test local density associations using density surface modelling. Results demonstrated BMA-specific factors influenced density, as well as the effects of habitat and topography on detections and movements of bears. Estimates from SECR were similar to those from closed population models and telemetry data, but with similar or higher levels of precision. Habitat was most associated with areas of higher bear density in the north, whereas mortality risk was most associated (negatively) with density of bears in the south. Comparisons of the distribution of mortality risk and habitat revealed differences by BMA that in turn influenced local abundance of bears. Combining SECR methods with density surface modelling increases the resolution of mark-recapture methods by directly inferring the effect of spatial factors on regulating local densities of animals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5980105/ /pubmed/29581471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23502-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Boulanger, John Nielsen, Scott E. Stenhouse, Gordon B. Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta |
title | Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta |
title_full | Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta |
title_fullStr | Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta |
title_full_unstemmed | Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta |
title_short | Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta |
title_sort | using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in alberta |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23502-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boulangerjohn usingspatialmarkrecaptureforconservationmonitoringofgrizzlybearpopulationsinalberta AT nielsenscotte usingspatialmarkrecaptureforconservationmonitoringofgrizzlybearpopulationsinalberta AT stenhousegordonb usingspatialmarkrecaptureforconservationmonitoringofgrizzlybearpopulationsinalberta |