Cargando…
Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
A randomized phase II selection design study (JCOG0904) was carried out to evaluate the more promising regimen between bortezomib (Bor) plus dexamethasone (Dex; BD) and thalidomide (Thal) plus Dex (TD) in Bor and Thal‐naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients ≥20 a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13550 |
_version_ | 1783327838534893568 |
---|---|
author | Iida, Shinsuke Wakabayashi, Masashi Tsukasaki, Kunihiro Miyamoto, Kenichi Maruyama, Dai Yamamoto, Kazuhito Takatsuka, Yoshifusa Kusumoto, Shigeru Kuroda, Junya Ando, Kiyoshi Kikukawa, Yoshitaka Masaki, Yasufumi Kobayashi, Miki Hanamura, Ichiro Asai, Hiroaki Nagai, Hirokazu Shimada, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto, Norifumi Inoue, Yoshiko Tobinai, Kensei |
author_facet | Iida, Shinsuke Wakabayashi, Masashi Tsukasaki, Kunihiro Miyamoto, Kenichi Maruyama, Dai Yamamoto, Kazuhito Takatsuka, Yoshifusa Kusumoto, Shigeru Kuroda, Junya Ando, Kiyoshi Kikukawa, Yoshitaka Masaki, Yasufumi Kobayashi, Miki Hanamura, Ichiro Asai, Hiroaki Nagai, Hirokazu Shimada, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto, Norifumi Inoue, Yoshiko Tobinai, Kensei |
author_sort | Iida, Shinsuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | A randomized phase II selection design study (JCOG0904) was carried out to evaluate the more promising regimen between bortezomib (Bor) plus dexamethasone (Dex; BD) and thalidomide (Thal) plus Dex (TD) in Bor and Thal‐naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients ≥20 and <80 years old with a documented diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) who received one or more prior therapies were randomized to receive BD (Bor 1.3 mg/m(2)) or TD (Thal 200 mg/d). In both arms, 8 cycles of induction (3‐week cycle) were followed by maintenance phase (5‐week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary end‐point was 1‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Forty‐four patients were randomized and assigned to receive BD and TD (n = 22, each group). At a median follow‐up of 34.3 months, the 1‐year PFS in the BD and TD arms were 45.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.4%‐64.3%) and 31.8% (95% CI, 14.2%‐51.1%), respectively, and the overall response rates were 77.3% and 40.9%, respectively. The 3‐year overall survival (OS) was 70.0% (95% CI, 44.9%‐85.4%) in the BD, and 48.8% (95% CI, 25.1%‐69.0%) in the TD arm. Among grade 3/4 adverse events, thrombocytopenia (54.5% vs 0.0%) and sensory peripheral neuropathy (22.7% vs 9.1%) were more frequent in BD when compared with the TD arm. Patients treated with BD had better outcomes than those treated with TD with regard to 1‐year PFS and 3‐year OS. Thus, BD was prioritized over TD for further investigations in Bor and Thal‐naïve RRMM patients. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000003135.) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5980148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59801482018-06-06 Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma Iida, Shinsuke Wakabayashi, Masashi Tsukasaki, Kunihiro Miyamoto, Kenichi Maruyama, Dai Yamamoto, Kazuhito Takatsuka, Yoshifusa Kusumoto, Shigeru Kuroda, Junya Ando, Kiyoshi Kikukawa, Yoshitaka Masaki, Yasufumi Kobayashi, Miki Hanamura, Ichiro Asai, Hiroaki Nagai, Hirokazu Shimada, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto, Norifumi Inoue, Yoshiko Tobinai, Kensei Cancer Sci Original Articles A randomized phase II selection design study (JCOG0904) was carried out to evaluate the more promising regimen between bortezomib (Bor) plus dexamethasone (Dex; BD) and thalidomide (Thal) plus Dex (TD) in Bor and Thal‐naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients ≥20 and <80 years old with a documented diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) who received one or more prior therapies were randomized to receive BD (Bor 1.3 mg/m(2)) or TD (Thal 200 mg/d). In both arms, 8 cycles of induction (3‐week cycle) were followed by maintenance phase (5‐week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary end‐point was 1‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Forty‐four patients were randomized and assigned to receive BD and TD (n = 22, each group). At a median follow‐up of 34.3 months, the 1‐year PFS in the BD and TD arms were 45.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.4%‐64.3%) and 31.8% (95% CI, 14.2%‐51.1%), respectively, and the overall response rates were 77.3% and 40.9%, respectively. The 3‐year overall survival (OS) was 70.0% (95% CI, 44.9%‐85.4%) in the BD, and 48.8% (95% CI, 25.1%‐69.0%) in the TD arm. Among grade 3/4 adverse events, thrombocytopenia (54.5% vs 0.0%) and sensory peripheral neuropathy (22.7% vs 9.1%) were more frequent in BD when compared with the TD arm. Patients treated with BD had better outcomes than those treated with TD with regard to 1‐year PFS and 3‐year OS. Thus, BD was prioritized over TD for further investigations in Bor and Thal‐naïve RRMM patients. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000003135.) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-17 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5980148/ /pubmed/29478257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13550 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Iida, Shinsuke Wakabayashi, Masashi Tsukasaki, Kunihiro Miyamoto, Kenichi Maruyama, Dai Yamamoto, Kazuhito Takatsuka, Yoshifusa Kusumoto, Shigeru Kuroda, Junya Ando, Kiyoshi Kikukawa, Yoshitaka Masaki, Yasufumi Kobayashi, Miki Hanamura, Ichiro Asai, Hiroaki Nagai, Hirokazu Shimada, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto, Norifumi Inoue, Yoshiko Tobinai, Kensei Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
title | Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
title_full | Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
title_short | Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
title_sort | bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iidashinsuke bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT wakabayashimasashi bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT tsukasakikunihiro bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT miyamotokenichi bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT maruyamadai bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT yamamotokazuhito bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT takatsukayoshifusa bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT kusumotoshigeru bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT kurodajunya bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT andokiyoshi bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT kikukawayoshitaka bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT masakiyasufumi bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT kobayashimiki bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT hanamuraichiro bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT asaihiroaki bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT nagaihirokazu bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT shimadakazuyuki bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT tsukamotonorifumi bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT inoueyoshiko bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT tobinaikensei bortezomibplusdexamethasonevsthalidomideplusdexamethasoneforrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma |