Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamilarasu, Suresh, Saminathan, Madeswaran, Sharma, S K, Pahuja, Anjali, Dewan, Abhinav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580032
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639
_version_ 1783327919009955840
author Tamilarasu, Suresh
Saminathan, Madeswaran
Sharma, S K
Pahuja, Anjali
Dewan, Abhinav
author_facet Tamilarasu, Suresh
Saminathan, Madeswaran
Sharma, S K
Pahuja, Anjali
Dewan, Abhinav
author_sort Tamilarasu, Suresh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively identified from the department database. Target volume (TV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) cancer guidelines. Dose prescribed to planning target volume (PTV) was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Two plans (6MV FB IMRT and 6MV FFFB IMRT) were generated to achieve 95% of prescription dose to PTV and sparing OAR as per normal tissue guidelines. Numbers of beams and their orientations were the same for all plans. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), treatment monitor unit (MU), beam on time (BOT) and non-tumor integral dose (NTID) were chosen for comparison. RESULTS: FFFB generated plans were clinically acceptable. There was a statistically significant difference among the FB IMRT and FFFB IMRT plans with respect to CI, HI, D50%, D2% in PTV coverage, bladder V50Gy, MU, mean NTID and non-tumor low dose volume. CONCLUSIONS: 6MV flattened and flattening filter free photon beams produce comparable plans by IMRT. FFF beams allow time efficient treatment delivery and may help reduce the risk of secondary malignances in carcinoma cervix cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5980834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59808342018-06-06 Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study Tamilarasu, Suresh Saminathan, Madeswaran Sharma, S K Pahuja, Anjali Dewan, Abhinav Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively identified from the department database. Target volume (TV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) cancer guidelines. Dose prescribed to planning target volume (PTV) was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Two plans (6MV FB IMRT and 6MV FFFB IMRT) were generated to achieve 95% of prescription dose to PTV and sparing OAR as per normal tissue guidelines. Numbers of beams and their orientations were the same for all plans. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), treatment monitor unit (MU), beam on time (BOT) and non-tumor integral dose (NTID) were chosen for comparison. RESULTS: FFFB generated plans were clinically acceptable. There was a statistically significant difference among the FB IMRT and FFFB IMRT plans with respect to CI, HI, D50%, D2% in PTV coverage, bladder V50Gy, MU, mean NTID and non-tumor low dose volume. CONCLUSIONS: 6MV flattened and flattening filter free photon beams produce comparable plans by IMRT. FFF beams allow time efficient treatment delivery and may help reduce the risk of secondary malignances in carcinoma cervix cases. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5980834/ /pubmed/29580032 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Tamilarasu, Suresh
Saminathan, Madeswaran
Sharma, S K
Pahuja, Anjali
Dewan, Abhinav
Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
title Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of a 6mv flattened beam and a flattening filter free beam for carcinoma of cervix – imrt planning study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580032
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639
work_keys_str_mv AT tamilarasusuresh comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy
AT saminathanmadeswaran comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy
AT sharmask comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy
AT pahujaanjali comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy
AT dewanabhinav comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy