Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580032 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639 |
_version_ | 1783327919009955840 |
---|---|
author | Tamilarasu, Suresh Saminathan, Madeswaran Sharma, S K Pahuja, Anjali Dewan, Abhinav |
author_facet | Tamilarasu, Suresh Saminathan, Madeswaran Sharma, S K Pahuja, Anjali Dewan, Abhinav |
author_sort | Tamilarasu, Suresh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively identified from the department database. Target volume (TV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) cancer guidelines. Dose prescribed to planning target volume (PTV) was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Two plans (6MV FB IMRT and 6MV FFFB IMRT) were generated to achieve 95% of prescription dose to PTV and sparing OAR as per normal tissue guidelines. Numbers of beams and their orientations were the same for all plans. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), treatment monitor unit (MU), beam on time (BOT) and non-tumor integral dose (NTID) were chosen for comparison. RESULTS: FFFB generated plans were clinically acceptable. There was a statistically significant difference among the FB IMRT and FFFB IMRT plans with respect to CI, HI, D50%, D2% in PTV coverage, bladder V50Gy, MU, mean NTID and non-tumor low dose volume. CONCLUSIONS: 6MV flattened and flattening filter free photon beams produce comparable plans by IMRT. FFF beams allow time efficient treatment delivery and may help reduce the risk of secondary malignances in carcinoma cervix cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5980834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59808342018-06-06 Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study Tamilarasu, Suresh Saminathan, Madeswaran Sharma, S K Pahuja, Anjali Dewan, Abhinav Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively identified from the department database. Target volume (TV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) cancer guidelines. Dose prescribed to planning target volume (PTV) was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Two plans (6MV FB IMRT and 6MV FFFB IMRT) were generated to achieve 95% of prescription dose to PTV and sparing OAR as per normal tissue guidelines. Numbers of beams and their orientations were the same for all plans. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), treatment monitor unit (MU), beam on time (BOT) and non-tumor integral dose (NTID) were chosen for comparison. RESULTS: FFFB generated plans were clinically acceptable. There was a statistically significant difference among the FB IMRT and FFFB IMRT plans with respect to CI, HI, D50%, D2% in PTV coverage, bladder V50Gy, MU, mean NTID and non-tumor low dose volume. CONCLUSIONS: 6MV flattened and flattening filter free photon beams produce comparable plans by IMRT. FFF beams allow time efficient treatment delivery and may help reduce the risk of secondary malignances in carcinoma cervix cases. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5980834/ /pubmed/29580032 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tamilarasu, Suresh Saminathan, Madeswaran Sharma, S K Pahuja, Anjali Dewan, Abhinav Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of a 6mv flattened beam and a flattening filter free beam for carcinoma of cervix – imrt planning study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580032 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamilarasusuresh comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy AT saminathanmadeswaran comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy AT sharmask comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy AT pahujaanjali comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy AT dewanabhinav comparativeevaluationofa6mvflattenedbeamandaflatteningfilterfreebeamforcarcinomaofcerviximrtplanningstudy |