Cargando…

Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators

BACKGROUND: To avoid inconvenience to patients due to linear accelerator down time in busy radio-therapy departments, treatment plans can be switched between linear accelerators provided that all exhibit the same same dosimetric characteristics. In other words linear accelerators should be beam-matc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashokkumar, Sangaiah, Ganesh, K M, Ramalingam, K, Karthikeyan, K, Jagadheeskumar, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29286616
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3439
_version_ 1783327936096501760
author Ashokkumar, Sangaiah
Ganesh, K M
Ramalingam, K
Karthikeyan, K
Jagadheeskumar, N
author_facet Ashokkumar, Sangaiah
Ganesh, K M
Ramalingam, K
Karthikeyan, K
Jagadheeskumar, N
author_sort Ashokkumar, Sangaiah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To avoid inconvenience to patients due to linear accelerator down time in busy radio-therapy departments, treatment plans can be switched between linear accelerators provided that all exhibit the same same dosimetric characteristics. In other words linear accelerators should be beam-matched. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of beam-matching using VMAT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetric data with a 6MV beam from am Clinac 2100CD were taken as baseline values and other two units, a 2300CD and a Unique Performance, were factory tuned in accordance. An analysis of PDD data was performed for different field sizes to evaluate energy matching. Beam profiles for field sizes of 10×10 cm(2) and 40 × 40 cm(2) at depths of 1.5 cm and 10 cm were analyzed. The relative output factor and MLC dosimetric properties were compared with each machine to determine variability among the different models. Thirty patients from our database were selected, ten each for head and neck, thorax and pelvis sites. VMAT plans were created in the Eclipse treatment planning system for a Clinac 2100 CD for reference. and verification plans were created for each to compare point dose measurements. RESULTS: The TPR 20/10 for 10 × 10 cm(2) was well matched, showing no energy differences. Deviation of all point dose measurements fell within ±3%. Planar dose maps all showed greater than 95% of points with a passed area γ-value less than 1. CONCLUSION: Our study evaluation of beam matching with treatment planning modeling showed good agreement fior 6 MV beams across all three linear accelerators used in our clinical environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5980907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59809072018-06-06 Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators Ashokkumar, Sangaiah Ganesh, K M Ramalingam, K Karthikeyan, K Jagadheeskumar, N Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: To avoid inconvenience to patients due to linear accelerator down time in busy radio-therapy departments, treatment plans can be switched between linear accelerators provided that all exhibit the same same dosimetric characteristics. In other words linear accelerators should be beam-matched. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of beam-matching using VMAT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetric data with a 6MV beam from am Clinac 2100CD were taken as baseline values and other two units, a 2300CD and a Unique Performance, were factory tuned in accordance. An analysis of PDD data was performed for different field sizes to evaluate energy matching. Beam profiles for field sizes of 10×10 cm(2) and 40 × 40 cm(2) at depths of 1.5 cm and 10 cm were analyzed. The relative output factor and MLC dosimetric properties were compared with each machine to determine variability among the different models. Thirty patients from our database were selected, ten each for head and neck, thorax and pelvis sites. VMAT plans were created in the Eclipse treatment planning system for a Clinac 2100 CD for reference. and verification plans were created for each to compare point dose measurements. RESULTS: The TPR 20/10 for 10 × 10 cm(2) was well matched, showing no energy differences. Deviation of all point dose measurements fell within ±3%. Planar dose maps all showed greater than 95% of points with a passed area γ-value less than 1. CONCLUSION: Our study evaluation of beam matching with treatment planning modeling showed good agreement fior 6 MV beams across all three linear accelerators used in our clinical environment. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5980907/ /pubmed/29286616 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3439 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Ashokkumar, Sangaiah
Ganesh, K M
Ramalingam, K
Karthikeyan, K
Jagadheeskumar, N
Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
title Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
title_full Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
title_fullStr Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
title_short Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators
title_sort dosimetric validation of volumetric modulated arc therapy with three 6mv beam-matched linear accelerators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29286616
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3439
work_keys_str_mv AT ashokkumarsangaiah dosimetricvalidationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapywiththree6mvbeammatchedlinearaccelerators
AT ganeshkm dosimetricvalidationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapywiththree6mvbeammatchedlinearaccelerators
AT ramalingamk dosimetricvalidationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapywiththree6mvbeammatchedlinearaccelerators
AT karthikeyank dosimetricvalidationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapywiththree6mvbeammatchedlinearaccelerators
AT jagadheeskumarn dosimetricvalidationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapywiththree6mvbeammatchedlinearaccelerators