Cargando…

Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living

The aim of this study was to characterize the muscle activation patterns which underlie the performance of two commonly used grasping patterns and compare the characteristics of such patterns during dexterity tests and activities of daily living. EMG of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum were m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowson, Jen, Yoxall, Alaster, Gonzalez, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00068
_version_ 1783327954721308672
author Rowson, Jen
Yoxall, Alaster
Gonzalez, Victor
author_facet Rowson, Jen
Yoxall, Alaster
Gonzalez, Victor
author_sort Rowson, Jen
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to characterize the muscle activation patterns which underlie the performance of two commonly used grasping patterns and compare the characteristics of such patterns during dexterity tests and activities of daily living. EMG of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum were monitored from 6 healthy participants as they performed three tasks related to activities of daily living (picking up a coin, drinking from a cup, feeding with a spoon) and three dexterity tests (Variable Dexterity Test-Precision, Variable Dexterity Test-Cylinder, Purdue Pegboard Test). A ten-camera motion capture system was used to simultaneously acquire kinematics of index and middle fingers. Spatiotemporal aspects of the EMG signals were analyzed and compared to metacarpophalangeal joint angle of index and middle fingers. The work has shown that a common rehabilitation test such as the Purdue Pegboard test is a poor representation of the muscle activation patterns for activities of daily living. EMG and joint angle patterns from the Variable Dexterity Tests which has been designed to more accurately reflect a range of ADl's were consistently comparable with tasks requiring precision and cylinder grip, reaffirming the importance of object size and shape when attempting to accurately assess hand function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5980987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59809872018-06-08 Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living Rowson, Jen Yoxall, Alaster Gonzalez, Victor Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The aim of this study was to characterize the muscle activation patterns which underlie the performance of two commonly used grasping patterns and compare the characteristics of such patterns during dexterity tests and activities of daily living. EMG of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum were monitored from 6 healthy participants as they performed three tasks related to activities of daily living (picking up a coin, drinking from a cup, feeding with a spoon) and three dexterity tests (Variable Dexterity Test-Precision, Variable Dexterity Test-Cylinder, Purdue Pegboard Test). A ten-camera motion capture system was used to simultaneously acquire kinematics of index and middle fingers. Spatiotemporal aspects of the EMG signals were analyzed and compared to metacarpophalangeal joint angle of index and middle fingers. The work has shown that a common rehabilitation test such as the Purdue Pegboard test is a poor representation of the muscle activation patterns for activities of daily living. EMG and joint angle patterns from the Variable Dexterity Tests which has been designed to more accurately reflect a range of ADl's were consistently comparable with tasks requiring precision and cylinder grip, reaffirming the importance of object size and shape when attempting to accurately assess hand function. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5980987/ /pubmed/29888225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00068 Text en Copyright © 2018 Rowson, Yoxall and Gonzalez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Rowson, Jen
Yoxall, Alaster
Gonzalez, Victor
Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
title Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
title_full Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
title_fullStr Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
title_full_unstemmed Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
title_short Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
title_sort differences in emg burst patterns during grasping dexterity tests and activities of daily living
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00068
work_keys_str_mv AT rowsonjen differencesinemgburstpatternsduringgraspingdexteritytestsandactivitiesofdailyliving
AT yoxallalaster differencesinemgburstpatternsduringgraspingdexteritytestsandactivitiesofdailyliving
AT gonzalezvictor differencesinemgburstpatternsduringgraspingdexteritytestsandactivitiesofdailyliving