Cargando…
Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living
The aim of this study was to characterize the muscle activation patterns which underlie the performance of two commonly used grasping patterns and compare the characteristics of such patterns during dexterity tests and activities of daily living. EMG of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum were m...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00068 |
_version_ | 1783327954721308672 |
---|---|
author | Rowson, Jen Yoxall, Alaster Gonzalez, Victor |
author_facet | Rowson, Jen Yoxall, Alaster Gonzalez, Victor |
author_sort | Rowson, Jen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to characterize the muscle activation patterns which underlie the performance of two commonly used grasping patterns and compare the characteristics of such patterns during dexterity tests and activities of daily living. EMG of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum were monitored from 6 healthy participants as they performed three tasks related to activities of daily living (picking up a coin, drinking from a cup, feeding with a spoon) and three dexterity tests (Variable Dexterity Test-Precision, Variable Dexterity Test-Cylinder, Purdue Pegboard Test). A ten-camera motion capture system was used to simultaneously acquire kinematics of index and middle fingers. Spatiotemporal aspects of the EMG signals were analyzed and compared to metacarpophalangeal joint angle of index and middle fingers. The work has shown that a common rehabilitation test such as the Purdue Pegboard test is a poor representation of the muscle activation patterns for activities of daily living. EMG and joint angle patterns from the Variable Dexterity Tests which has been designed to more accurately reflect a range of ADl's were consistently comparable with tasks requiring precision and cylinder grip, reaffirming the importance of object size and shape when attempting to accurately assess hand function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5980987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59809872018-06-08 Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living Rowson, Jen Yoxall, Alaster Gonzalez, Victor Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The aim of this study was to characterize the muscle activation patterns which underlie the performance of two commonly used grasping patterns and compare the characteristics of such patterns during dexterity tests and activities of daily living. EMG of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum were monitored from 6 healthy participants as they performed three tasks related to activities of daily living (picking up a coin, drinking from a cup, feeding with a spoon) and three dexterity tests (Variable Dexterity Test-Precision, Variable Dexterity Test-Cylinder, Purdue Pegboard Test). A ten-camera motion capture system was used to simultaneously acquire kinematics of index and middle fingers. Spatiotemporal aspects of the EMG signals were analyzed and compared to metacarpophalangeal joint angle of index and middle fingers. The work has shown that a common rehabilitation test such as the Purdue Pegboard test is a poor representation of the muscle activation patterns for activities of daily living. EMG and joint angle patterns from the Variable Dexterity Tests which has been designed to more accurately reflect a range of ADl's were consistently comparable with tasks requiring precision and cylinder grip, reaffirming the importance of object size and shape when attempting to accurately assess hand function. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5980987/ /pubmed/29888225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00068 Text en Copyright © 2018 Rowson, Yoxall and Gonzalez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Rowson, Jen Yoxall, Alaster Gonzalez, Victor Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living |
title | Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living |
title_full | Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living |
title_fullStr | Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living |
title_short | Differences in EMG Burst Patterns During Grasping Dexterity Tests and Activities of Daily Living |
title_sort | differences in emg burst patterns during grasping dexterity tests and activities of daily living |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5980987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29888225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rowsonjen differencesinemgburstpatternsduringgraspingdexteritytestsandactivitiesofdailyliving AT yoxallalaster differencesinemgburstpatternsduringgraspingdexteritytestsandactivitiesofdailyliving AT gonzalezvictor differencesinemgburstpatternsduringgraspingdexteritytestsandactivitiesofdailyliving |