Cargando…
Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP. METHODS: We conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896571 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105 |
_version_ | 1783327983700803584 |
---|---|
author | Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K Junnarkar, Sameer P Low, Jee Keem Woon, Winston Shelat, Vishal G |
author_facet | Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K Junnarkar, Sameer P Low, Jee Keem Woon, Winston Shelat, Vishal G |
author_sort | Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for AP from July 2009 to September 2016. Final severity was determined using the revised Atlanta classification. Mortality and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: From July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 675 patients with a diagnosis of AP were admitted at the hospital. Of them, 669 patients who had sufficient data were analyzed. Their average age±SD was 58.7±17.4 years (range, 21–98 years). There was a male preponderance (n=393, 53.8%). A total of 82 (12.3%) patients had eventual severe pancreatitis. RS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 52.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%. GS demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 69.2% with a PPV of 25.8% and a NPV of 95.5%. For severity prediction, areas under the curve (AUCs) for RS and GS were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.819–0.875) and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.750–0.814), respectively (p=0.003). Twelve (1.6%) patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: RS has higher sensitivity, NPV and AUC for predicting severity of AP than GS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5981140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59811402018-06-12 Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K Junnarkar, Sameer P Low, Jee Keem Woon, Winston Shelat, Vishal G Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Original Article BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for AP from July 2009 to September 2016. Final severity was determined using the revised Atlanta classification. Mortality and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: From July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 675 patients with a diagnosis of AP were admitted at the hospital. Of them, 669 patients who had sufficient data were analyzed. Their average age±SD was 58.7±17.4 years (range, 21–98 years). There was a male preponderance (n=393, 53.8%). A total of 82 (12.3%) patients had eventual severe pancreatitis. RS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 52.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%. GS demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 69.2% with a PPV of 25.8% and a NPV of 95.5%. For severity prediction, areas under the curve (AUCs) for RS and GS were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.819–0.875) and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.750–0.814), respectively (p=0.003). Twelve (1.6%) patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: RS has higher sensitivity, NPV and AUC for predicting severity of AP than GS. Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2018-05 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5981140/ /pubmed/29896571 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K Junnarkar, Sameer P Low, Jee Keem Woon, Winston Shelat, Vishal G Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
title | Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
title_full | Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
title_fullStr | Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
title_short | Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
title_sort | are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896571 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiatthaddaeustanjun aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient AT gunasekaransivarajk aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient AT junnarkarsameerp aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient AT lowjeekeem aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient AT woonwinston aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient AT shelatvishalg aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient |