Cargando…

Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP. METHODS: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun, Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K, Junnarkar, Sameer P, Low, Jee Keem, Woon, Winston, Shelat, Vishal G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896571
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105
_version_ 1783327983700803584
author Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun
Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K
Junnarkar, Sameer P
Low, Jee Keem
Woon, Winston
Shelat, Vishal G
author_facet Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun
Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K
Junnarkar, Sameer P
Low, Jee Keem
Woon, Winston
Shelat, Vishal G
author_sort Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for AP from July 2009 to September 2016. Final severity was determined using the revised Atlanta classification. Mortality and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: From July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 675 patients with a diagnosis of AP were admitted at the hospital. Of them, 669 patients who had sufficient data were analyzed. Their average age±SD was 58.7±17.4 years (range, 21–98 years). There was a male preponderance (n=393, 53.8%). A total of 82 (12.3%) patients had eventual severe pancreatitis. RS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 52.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%. GS demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 69.2% with a PPV of 25.8% and a NPV of 95.5%. For severity prediction, areas under the curve (AUCs) for RS and GS were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.819–0.875) and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.750–0.814), respectively (p=0.003). Twelve (1.6%) patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: RS has higher sensitivity, NPV and AUC for predicting severity of AP than GS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5981140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59811402018-06-12 Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K Junnarkar, Sameer P Low, Jee Keem Woon, Winston Shelat, Vishal G Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Original Article BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Ranson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for AP from July 2009 to September 2016. Final severity was determined using the revised Atlanta classification. Mortality and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: From July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 675 patients with a diagnosis of AP were admitted at the hospital. Of them, 669 patients who had sufficient data were analyzed. Their average age±SD was 58.7±17.4 years (range, 21–98 years). There was a male preponderance (n=393, 53.8%). A total of 82 (12.3%) patients had eventual severe pancreatitis. RS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 52.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%. GS demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 69.2% with a PPV of 25.8% and a NPV of 95.5%. For severity prediction, areas under the curve (AUCs) for RS and GS were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.819–0.875) and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.750–0.814), respectively (p=0.003). Twelve (1.6%) patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: RS has higher sensitivity, NPV and AUC for predicting severity of AP than GS. Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2018-05 2018-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5981140/ /pubmed/29896571 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kiat, Thaddaeus Tan Jun
Gunasekaran, Sivaraj K
Junnarkar, Sameer P
Low, Jee Keem
Woon, Winston
Shelat, Vishal G
Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
title Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
title_full Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
title_fullStr Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
title_full_unstemmed Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
title_short Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
title_sort are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29896571
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105
work_keys_str_mv AT kiatthaddaeustanjun aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient
AT gunasekaransivarajk aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient
AT junnarkarsameerp aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient
AT lowjeekeem aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient
AT woonwinston aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient
AT shelatvishalg aretraditionalscoringsystemsforseveritystratificationofacutepancreatitissufficient