Cargando…
Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is an inherent problem of positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) systems. Simulation studies showed that time-of-flight (TOF) detectors can reduce PET quantification errors in MRI-based AC. However, its impact on lesion dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0390-8 |
_version_ | 1783327986741673984 |
---|---|
author | Muehlematter, Urs J. Nagel, Hannes W. Becker, Anton Mueller, Julian Vokinger, Kerstin N. de Galiza Barbosa, Felipe ter Voert, Edwin E. G. T. Veit-Haibach, Patrick Burger, Irene A. |
author_facet | Muehlematter, Urs J. Nagel, Hannes W. Becker, Anton Mueller, Julian Vokinger, Kerstin N. de Galiza Barbosa, Felipe ter Voert, Edwin E. G. T. Veit-Haibach, Patrick Burger, Irene A. |
author_sort | Muehlematter, Urs J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is an inherent problem of positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) systems. Simulation studies showed that time-of-flight (TOF) detectors can reduce PET quantification errors in MRI-based AC. However, its impact on lesion detection in a clinical setting with (18)F-choline has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, we compared TOF and non-TOF (18)F-choline PET for absolute and relative difference in standard uptake values (SUV) and investigated the detection rate of metastases in prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Non-TOF SUV was significantly lower compared to TOF in all osseous structures, except the skull, in primary lesions of the prostate, and in pelvic nodal and osseous metastasis. Concerning lymph node metastases, both experienced readers detected 16/19 (84%) on TOF PET, whereas on non-TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 11 (58%), and 14 (73%), respectively. With TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 14/15 (93%) and 11/15 (73%) bone metastases, respectively, whereas detection rate with non-TOF PET was 73% (11/15) for reader 1 and 53% (8/15) for reader 2. The interreader agreement was good for osseous metastasis detection on TOF (kappa 0.636, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.453–0.810) and moderate on non-TOF (kappa = 0.600, CI 0.438–0.780). CONCLUSION: TOF reconstruction for (18)F-choline PET/MRI shows higher SUV measurements compared to non-TOF reconstructions in physiological osseous structures as well as pelvic malignancies. Our results suggest that addition of TOF information has a positive impact on lesion detection rate for lymph node and bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0390-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5981153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59811532018-06-14 Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer Muehlematter, Urs J. Nagel, Hannes W. Becker, Anton Mueller, Julian Vokinger, Kerstin N. de Galiza Barbosa, Felipe ter Voert, Edwin E. G. T. Veit-Haibach, Patrick Burger, Irene A. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is an inherent problem of positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) systems. Simulation studies showed that time-of-flight (TOF) detectors can reduce PET quantification errors in MRI-based AC. However, its impact on lesion detection in a clinical setting with (18)F-choline has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, we compared TOF and non-TOF (18)F-choline PET for absolute and relative difference in standard uptake values (SUV) and investigated the detection rate of metastases in prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Non-TOF SUV was significantly lower compared to TOF in all osseous structures, except the skull, in primary lesions of the prostate, and in pelvic nodal and osseous metastasis. Concerning lymph node metastases, both experienced readers detected 16/19 (84%) on TOF PET, whereas on non-TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 11 (58%), and 14 (73%), respectively. With TOF PET readers 1 and 2 detected 14/15 (93%) and 11/15 (73%) bone metastases, respectively, whereas detection rate with non-TOF PET was 73% (11/15) for reader 1 and 53% (8/15) for reader 2. The interreader agreement was good for osseous metastasis detection on TOF (kappa 0.636, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.453–0.810) and moderate on non-TOF (kappa = 0.600, CI 0.438–0.780). CONCLUSION: TOF reconstruction for (18)F-choline PET/MRI shows higher SUV measurements compared to non-TOF reconstructions in physiological osseous structures as well as pelvic malignancies. Our results suggest that addition of TOF information has a positive impact on lesion detection rate for lymph node and bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0390-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5981153/ /pubmed/29855728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0390-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018, corrected publication August/2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Muehlematter, Urs J. Nagel, Hannes W. Becker, Anton Mueller, Julian Vokinger, Kerstin N. de Galiza Barbosa, Felipe ter Voert, Edwin E. G. T. Veit-Haibach, Patrick Burger, Irene A. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer |
title | Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer |
title_full | Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer |
title_short | Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)F-choline PET/MRI for prostate cancer |
title_sort | impact of time-of-flight pet on quantification accuracy and lesion detection in simultaneous (18)f-choline pet/mri for prostate cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0390-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muehlematterursj impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT nagelhannesw impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT beckeranton impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT muellerjulian impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT vokingerkerstinn impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT degalizabarbosafelipe impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT tervoertedwinegt impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT veithaibachpatrick impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer AT burgerirenea impactoftimeofflightpetonquantificationaccuracyandlesiondetectioninsimultaneous18fcholinepetmriforprostatecancer |