Cargando…

Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials

Large bone defects are serious complications that are most commonly caused by extensive trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital musculoskeletal disorders. If nonunion occurs, implantation for repairing bone defects with biomaterials developed as a defect filler, which can promote bone regeneration,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ye, Chen, Shu-Kui, Li, Long, Qin, Ling, Wang, Xin-Luan, Lai, Yu-Xiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002
_version_ 1783328229086461952
author Li, Ye
Chen, Shu-Kui
Li, Long
Qin, Ling
Wang, Xin-Luan
Lai, Yu-Xiao
author_facet Li, Ye
Chen, Shu-Kui
Li, Long
Qin, Ling
Wang, Xin-Luan
Lai, Yu-Xiao
author_sort Li, Ye
collection PubMed
description Large bone defects are serious complications that are most commonly caused by extensive trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital musculoskeletal disorders. If nonunion occurs, implantation for repairing bone defects with biomaterials developed as a defect filler, which can promote bone regeneration, is essential. In order to evaluate biomaterials to be developed as bone substitutes for bone defect repair, it is essential to establish clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo testing models for investigating their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, degradation, and interactional with culture medium or host tissues. The results of the in vitro experiment contribute significantly to the evaluation of direct cell response to the substitute biomaterial, and the in vivo tests constitute a step midway between in vitro tests and human clinical trials. Therefore, it is essential to develop or adopt a suitable in vivo bone defect animal model for testing bone substitutes for defect repair. This review aimed at introducing and discussing the most available and commonly used bone defect animal models for testing specific substitute biomaterials. Additionally, we reviewed surgical protocols for establishing relevant preclinical bone defect models with various animal species and the evaluation methodologies of the bone regeneration process after the implantation of bone substitute biomaterials. This review provides an important reference for preclinical studies in translational orthopaedics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5982383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59823832018-07-20 Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials Li, Ye Chen, Shu-Kui Li, Long Qin, Ling Wang, Xin-Luan Lai, Yu-Xiao J Orthop Translat Review Article Large bone defects are serious complications that are most commonly caused by extensive trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital musculoskeletal disorders. If nonunion occurs, implantation for repairing bone defects with biomaterials developed as a defect filler, which can promote bone regeneration, is essential. In order to evaluate biomaterials to be developed as bone substitutes for bone defect repair, it is essential to establish clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo testing models for investigating their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, degradation, and interactional with culture medium or host tissues. The results of the in vitro experiment contribute significantly to the evaluation of direct cell response to the substitute biomaterial, and the in vivo tests constitute a step midway between in vitro tests and human clinical trials. Therefore, it is essential to develop or adopt a suitable in vivo bone defect animal model for testing bone substitutes for defect repair. This review aimed at introducing and discussing the most available and commonly used bone defect animal models for testing specific substitute biomaterials. Additionally, we reviewed surgical protocols for establishing relevant preclinical bone defect models with various animal species and the evaluation methodologies of the bone regeneration process after the implantation of bone substitute biomaterials. This review provides an important reference for preclinical studies in translational orthopaedics. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5982383/ /pubmed/30035046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Li, Ye
Chen, Shu-Kui
Li, Long
Qin, Ling
Wang, Xin-Luan
Lai, Yu-Xiao
Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
title Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
title_full Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
title_fullStr Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
title_full_unstemmed Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
title_short Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
title_sort bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5982383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002
work_keys_str_mv AT liye bonedefectanimalmodelsfortestingefficacyofbonesubstitutebiomaterials
AT chenshukui bonedefectanimalmodelsfortestingefficacyofbonesubstitutebiomaterials
AT lilong bonedefectanimalmodelsfortestingefficacyofbonesubstitutebiomaterials
AT qinling bonedefectanimalmodelsfortestingefficacyofbonesubstitutebiomaterials
AT wangxinluan bonedefectanimalmodelsfortestingefficacyofbonesubstitutebiomaterials
AT laiyuxiao bonedefectanimalmodelsfortestingefficacyofbonesubstitutebiomaterials